This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, B. L.

 Previous Article

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 01 1997, 185-201, Vol 10, No. 1
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

PCR in laboratory diagnosis of human Borrelia burgdorferi infections

BL Schmidt
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Dermato-Venerological Serodiagnosis, Hospital of Vienna-Lainz, Vienna, Austria.

The laboratory diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis, the most prevalent vector- borne disease in the United States and endemic in parts of Europe and Asia, is currently based on serology with known limitations. Direct demonstration of Borrelia burgdorferi by culture may require weeks, while enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for antigen detection often lack sensitivity. The development of the PCR has offered a new dimension in the diagnosis. Capable of amplifying minute amounts of DNA into billions of copies in just a few hours, PCR facilitates the sensitive and specific detection of DNA or RNA of pathogenic organisms. This review is restricted to applications of PCR methods in the diagnosis of human B. burgdorferi infections. In the first section, methodological aspects, e.g., sample preparation, target selection, primers and PCR methods, and detection and control of inhibition and contamination, are highlighted. In the second part, emphasis is placed on diagnostic aspects, where PCR results in patients with dermatological, neurological, joint, and ocular manifestations of the disease are discussed. Here, special attention is given to monitoring treatment efficacy by PCR tests. Last, specific guidelines on how to interpret PCR results, together with the advantages and limitations of these new techniques, are presented.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Vojdani, A., Hebroni, F., Raphael, Y., Erde, J., Raxlen, B. (2009). Novel Diagnosis of Lyme Disease: Potential for CAM Intervention. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 6: 283-295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cerar, T., Ogrinc, K., Cimperman, J., Lotric-Furlan, S., Strle, F., Ruzic-Sabljic, E. (2008). Validation of Cultivation and PCR Methods for Diagnosis of Lyme Neuroborreliosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3375-3379 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dong, J., Olano, J. P., McBride, J. W., Walker, D. H. (2008). Emerging Pathogens: Challenges and Successes of Molecular Diagnostics. J. Mol. Diagn. 10: 185-197 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Radstrom, P., Lofstrom, C., Lovenklev, M., Knutsson, R., Wolffs, P. (2008). Strategies for Overcoming PCR Inhibition. CSH Protocols 2008: pdb.top20-pdb.top20 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rauter, C., Mueller, M., Diterich, I., Zeller, S., Hassler, D., Meergans, T., Hartung, T. (2005). Critical Evaluation of Urine-Based PCR Assay for Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis. CVI 12: 910-917 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aguero-Rosenfeld, M. E., Wang, G., Schwartz, I., Wormser, G. P. (2005). Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 484-509 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Zeng, Q.-Y., Westermark, S.-O., Rasmuson-Lestander, A., Wang, X.-R. (2004). Detection and Quantification of Wallemia sebi in Aerosols by Real-Time PCR, Conventional PCR, and Cultivation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 7295-7302 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Courtney, J. W., Kostelnik, L. M., Zeidner, N. S., Massung, R. F. (2004). Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3164-3168 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bergmann, A. R., Schmidt, B. L., Derler, A.-M., Aberer, E. (2002). Importance of Sample Preparation for Molecular Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis from Urine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 4581-4584 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yamamoto, Y. (2002). PCR in Diagnosis of Infection: Detection of Bacteria in Cerebrospinal Fluids. CVI 9: 508-514 [Full Text]  
  • Eskow, E., Rao, R.-V. S., Mordechai, E. (2001). Concurrent Infection of the Central Nervous System by Borrelia burgdorferi and Bartonella henselae: Evidence for a Novel Tick-borne Disease Complex. Arch Neurol 58: 1357-1363 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dabil, H., Boley, M. L., Schmitz, T. M., Van Gelder, R. N. (2001). Validation of a Diagnostic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Infectious Posterior Uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 119: 1315-1322 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pleyer, U., Priem, S., Bergmann, L., Burmester, G., Hartmann, C., Krause, A. (2001). Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in urine of patients with ocular Lyme borreliosis. Br J Ophthalmol 85: 552-555 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Karussis, D., Weiner, H. L, Abramsky, O. (1999). Multiple sclerosis vs Lyme disease: A case presentation to a discussant and a review of the literature. Mult Scler 5: 395-402  
  • Boman, J., Gaydos, C. A., Quinn, T. C. (1999). Molecular Diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3791-3799 [Full Text]  
  • Wicher, K., Abbruscato, F., Wicher, V., Collins, D. N., Auger, I., Horowitz, H. W. (1998). Identification of Persistent Infection in Experimental Syphilis by PCR. Infect. Immun. 66: 2509-2513 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»