This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocan, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meléndez, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kocan, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meléndez, R. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2003, p. 698-712, Vol. 16, No. 4
0893-8512/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.4.698-712.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antigens and Alternatives for Control of Anaplasma marginale Infection in Cattle

Katherine M. Kocan,1* José de la Fuente,1 Alberto A. Guglielmone,2 and Roy D. Meléndez3

Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078,1 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Rafaela 2300, Argentina,2 Area de Parasitologia, decanato del Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Centroccidental "Lisandro Alvarado," Barquisimeto, Lara State 3001-A, Venezuela3

Anaplasmosis, a tick-borne cattle disease caused by the rickettsia Anaplasma marginale, is endemic in tropical and subtropical areas of the world. The disease causes considerable economic loss to both the dairy and beef industries worldwide. Analyses of 16S rRNA, groESL, and surface proteins have resulted in the recent reclassification of the order Rickettsiales. The genus Anaplasma, of which A. marginale is the type species, now also includes A. bovis, A. platys, and A. phagocytophilum, which were previously known as Ehrlichia bovis, E. platys, and the E. phagocytophila group (which causes human granulocytic ehrlichiosis), respectively. Live and killed vaccines have been used for control of anaplasmosis, and both types of vaccines have advantages and disadvantages. These vaccines have been effective in preventing clinical anaplasmosis in cattle but have not blocked A. marginale infection. Thus, persistently infected cattle serve as a reservoir of infective blood for both mechanical transmission and infection of ticks. Advances in biochemical, immunologic, and molecular technologies during the last decade have been applied to research of A. marginale and related organisms. The recent development of a cell culture system for A. marginale provides a potential source of antigen for the development of improved killed and live vaccines, and the availability of cell culture-derived antigen would eliminate the use of cattle in vaccine production. Increased knowledge of A. marginale antigen repertoires and an improved understanding of bovine cellular and humoral immune responses to A. marginale, combined with the new technologies, should contribute to the development of more effective vaccines for control and prevention of anaplasmosis.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-2007. Phone: (405) 744-7271. Fax (405) 744-5275. E-mail: kmk285{at}okstate.edu.


Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2003, p. 698-712, Vol. 16, No. 4
0893-8512/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.4.698-712.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Futse, J. E., Brayton, K. A., Dark, M. J., Knowles, D. P. Jr., Palmer, G. H. (2008). Superinfection as a driver of genomic diversification in antigenically variant pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 2123-2127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Meeusen, E. N. T., Walker, J., Peters, A., Pastoret, P.-P., Jungersen, G. (2007). Current Status of Veterinary Vaccines. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 489-510 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de la Fuente, J., Atkinson, M. W., Hogg, J. T., Miller, D. S., Naranjo, V., Almazan, C., Anderson, N., Kocan, K. M. (2006). Genetic Characterization of Anaplasma ovis Strains from Bighorn Sheep in Montana.. J Wildl Dis 42: 381-385 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kawahara, M., Rikihisa, Y., Lin, Q., Isogai, E., Tahara, K., Itagaki, A., Hiramitsu, Y., Tajima, T. (2006). Novel Genetic Variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma centrale, and a Novel Ehrlichia sp. in Wild Deer and Ticks on Two Major Islands in Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 1102-1109 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dreher, U. M., de la Fuente, J., Hofmann-Lehmann, R., Meli, M. L., Pusterla, N., Kocan, K. M., Woldehiwet, Z., Braun, U., Regula, G., Staerk, K. D. C., Lutz, H. (2005). Serologic Cross-Reactivity between Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. CVI 12: 1177-1183 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brayton, K. A., Kappmeyer, L. S., Herndon, D. R., Dark, M. J., Tibbals, D. L., Palmer, G. H., McGuire, T. C., Knowles, D. P. Jr. (2005). Complete genome sequencing of Anaplasma marginale reveals that the surface is skewed to two superfamilies of outer membrane proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 844-849 [Abstract] [Full Text]