This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Elder, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Elder, B. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2004, p. 681-694, Vol. 17, No. 3
0893-8512/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CMR.17.3.681-694.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Competency Assessment in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory

Susan E. Sharp1* and B. Laurel Elder2

Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente and Pathology Regional Laboratory, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, Oregon 97230,1 Department of Microbiology, CompuNet Clinical Laboratories and Wright State University, Moraine, Ohio 454592

The laboratory comprises an invaluable part of the total health care provided to patients. Competency assessment is one method by which we can verify that our employees are competent to perform laboratory testing and report accurate and timely results. To derive the greatest benefit from the inclusion of competency assessment in the laboratory, we must be sure that we are addressing areas where our efforts can be best utilized to optimize patient care. To be competent, an employee must know how to perform a test, must have the ability to perform the test, must be able to perform the test properly without supervision, and know when there is a problem with the test that must be solved. In some cases, competency assessment protocols may demonstrate areas of competence but can fail to disclose incompetence. For example, challenges of low-complexity tasks (such as reading the technical procedure manual) are inferior to challenges that measure understanding and execution of a protocol, and poorly designed competency challenges will probably not detect substandard laboratory performance. Thus, if we are to receive the greatest benefit from our competency assessment programs, which may be time-consuming for the supervisors and the staff as well, we must not only meet the letter of the law but also find a way to make these assessments meaningful, instructive, and able to detect areas of concern. As we address competency assessment in our laboratories, we must understand that when done properly, competency assessment will reward our organizations and assist us in providing the best possible care to our patients.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pathology Regional Laboratory, Kaiser Permanente, Oregon Health Science University, 13705 N.E. Airport Way, Portland, OR 97230.

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2004, p. 681-694, Vol. 17, No. 3
0893-8512/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CMR.17.3.681-694.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»