This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baughn, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Musher, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baughn, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Musher, D. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Syphilis

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2005, p. 205-216, Vol. 18, No. 1
0893-8512/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.18.1.205-216.2005

Secondary Syphilitic Lesions

Robert E. Baughn1,2* and Daniel M. Musher2,3

Departments of Dermatology,1 Medicine,3 Baylor College of Medicine, and the Syphilis Research and Infectious Disease Laboratories, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas2

An important theme that emerges from all early historical accounts is that in addition to the decreased virulence of Treponema pallidum, the incidence of secondary syphilis has decreased drastically over the past three centuries. Even in the early 20th century, most syphilologists were of the opinion that the disease had undergone changes in its manifestations and that they were dealing with an attenuated form of the spirochete. Such opinions were based primarily on the observations that violent cutaneous reactions and fatalities associated with the secondary stage had become extremely rare. The rate of primary and secondary syphilis in the United States increased in 2002 for the second consecutive year. After a decade-long decline that led to an all-time low in 2000, the recent trend is attributable, to a large extent, by a increase in reported syphilis cases among men, particularly homosexual and bisexual men having sex with men. The present review addresses the clinical and diagnostic criteria for the recognition of secondary syphilis, the clinical course and manifestations of the disease if allowed to proceed past the primary stage of disease in untreated individuals, and the treatment for this stage of the disease.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Syphilis Research Laboratory, Bldg. 109, Room 234A, VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 791-1414 ext. 5876. Fax: (713) 794-7957. E-mail: rbaughn{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2005, p. 205-216, Vol. 18, No. 1
0893-8512/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.18.1.205-216.2005




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lanjouw, E, van der Meijden, W I, den Hollander, J C, Neumann, H A M (2009). Unusual late nodular presentation of secondary syphilis. Int J STD AIDS 20: 271-273 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Noto, P, Del Nonno, F, Licci, S, Chinello, P, Petrosillo, N (2008). Early syphilitic hepatitis in an immunocompetent patient: really so uncommon?. Int J STD AIDS 19: 65-66 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • LaFond, R. E., Lukehart, S. A. (2006). Biological Basis for Syphilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 29-49 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»