CMR FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, M. F.
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2005, p. 583-607, Vol. 18, No. 4
0893-8512/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.18.4.583-607.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare

Daniel V. Lim,* Joyce M. Simpson, Elizabeth A. Kearns, and Marianne F. Kramer

Department of Biology and Center for Biological Defense, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620

Recent events have made public health officials acutely aware of the importance of rapidly and accurately detecting acts of bioterrorism. Because bioterrorism is difficult to predict or prevent, reliable platforms to rapidly detect and identify biothreat agents are important to minimize the spread of these agents and to protect the public health. These platforms must not only be sensitive and specific, but must also be able to accurately detect a variety of pathogens, including modified or previously uncharacterized agents, directly from complex sample matrices. Various commercial tests utilizing biochemical, immunological, nucleic acid, and bioluminescence procedures are currently available to identify biological threat agents. Newer tests have also been developed to identify such agents using aptamers, biochips, evanescent wave biosensors, cantilevers, living cells, and other innovative technologies. This review describes these current and developing technologies and considers challenges to rapid, accurate detection of biothreat agents. Although there is no ideal platform, many of these technologies have proved invaluable for the detection and identification of biothreat agents.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology and Center for Biological Defense, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, SCA110, Tampa, FL 33620-5200. Phone: (813) 974-1618. Fax: (813) 974-3263. E-mail: Lim{at}cas.usf.edu.


Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2005, p. 583-607, Vol. 18, No. 4
0893-8512/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.18.4.583-607.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Vaccine Immunol.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.