This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Kimman, T. G. Articles by Klein, M. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kimman, T. G. Articles by Klein, M. R.

Next Article 

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2008, p. 403-425, Vol. 21, No. 3
0893-8512/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.00014-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evidence-Based Biosafety: a Review of the Principles and Effectiveness of Microbiological Containment Measures

Center for Infectious Disease Control,¹ International Team, RIVM, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands²

We examined the available evidence on the effectiveness of measures aimed at protecting humans and the environment against the risks of working with genetically modified microorganisms (GMOs) and with non-GMO pathogenic microorganisms. A few principles and methods underlie the current biosafety practice: risk assessment, biological containment, concentration and enclosure, exposure minimization, physical containment, and hazard minimization. Many of the current practices are based on experience and expert judgment. The effectiveness of biosafety measures may be evaluated at the level of single containment equipment items and procedures, at the level of the laboratory as a whole, or at the clinical-epidemiological level. Data on the containment effectiveness of equipment and laboratories are scarce and fragmented. Laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) are therefore important for evaluating the effectiveness of biosafety. For the majority of LAIs there appears to be no direct cause, suggesting that failures of biosafety were not noticed or that containment may have been insufficient. The number of reported laboratory accidents associated with GMOs is substantially lower than that of those associated with non-GMOs. It is unknown to what extent specific measures contribute to the overall level of biosafety. We therefore recommend that the evidence base of biosafety practice be strengthened.