This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Korkeala, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Korkeala, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, April 2003, p. 220-229, Vol. 16, No. 2
0893-8512/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.220-229.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Low Occurrence of Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Clinical, Food, and Environmental Samples: a Methodological Problem

Maria Fredriksson-Ahomaa1,2* and Hannu Korkeala1

Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,1 Institute of Hygiene and Technology of Food of Animal Origin, University of Munich, Munich, Germany2

SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
CULTURE METHODS
    Cold Enrichment
    Selective Enrichment
    Selective Agar Plates
    Identification
    Pathogenicity
COLONY HYBRIDIZATION METHODS
PCR-BASED DETECTION METHODS
    Target Genes
    Sample Preparation
    DNA Extraction
    Detection of PCR Products
    False-Positive Results
    False-Negative Results
OCCURRENCE IN NATURAL SAMPLES
    Clinical Samples
    Food Samples
    Environmental Samples
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

arrow
SUMMARY
 
While Yersinia enterocolitica is an important pathogen, which can cause yersiniosis in humans and animals, its epidemiology remains obscure. The pig is the major reservoir of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica of bioserotype 4/O:3, the most common type found in humans. Y. enterocolitica is thought to be a significant food-borne pathogen, although pathogenic isolates have seldom been recovered from foods. The low isolation rate of this pathogenic bacterium in natural samples, including clinical, food, and environmental samples, may be due to the limited sensitivity of culture methods. During the last decade, numerous DNA-based methods, such as PCR and colony hybridization assays, have been designed to detect pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples more rapidly and with better sensitivity than can be achieved by culture methods. In addition, the occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples is clearly higher with PCR than with culture methods. The methods available for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples are reviewed in this article.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Yersinia enterocolitica, a gram-negative, oxidase-negative, and facultatively anaerobic species, is highly heterogeneous and can be divided into several bioserotypes, only a few of which are known to associate with human disease (18, 121). Most Y. enterocolitica strains associated with human yersiniosis belong to bioserotypes 1B/O:8, 2/O:5,27, 2/O:9, 3/O:3, and 4/O:3. All fully virulent Yersinia strains carry an approximately 70-kb plasmid termed pYV (plasmid for Yersinia virulence) (116), which is essential for the bacterium to survive and multiply in lymphoid tissues (21, 26).

Although Y. enterocolitica is a ubiquitous microorganism, the majority of isolates recovered from asymptomatic carriers, food, and environmental samples are nonpathogenic. Nevertheless, it is important to determine the pathogenic significance of isolates (28, 76). This can be done with several phenotypic tests, but these are time-consuming and are not always reliable (83). PCR and DNA colony hybridization assays have been used to verify the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica isolates rapidly and with high specificity (13, 77, 163). These methods are based on specific segments, such as yadA and virF genes, of the virulence plasmid.

The epidemiology of Y. enterocolitica infections is complex and poorly understood. Most cases of yersiniosis occur sporadically without an apparent source (19, 76, 113, 139). Y. enterocolitica is thought to be a significant food-borne pathogen, although pathogenic isolates have seldom been isolated from foods, except from edible pig offal (28, 47, 48). In case-control studies, a correlation has been demonstrated between the consumption of raw or undercooked pork and yersiniosis (114, 127, 141). Genotypes of Y. enterocolitica strains found in pigs and pork are indistinguishable from strains found in humans, further supporting the association between yersiniosis and consumption of pork (44).

Difficulties associated with the isolation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica stem from the small number of pathogenic strains in the samples and the large number of organisms in the background flora, especially in food and environmental samples. Direct isolation, even on selective media, is seldom successful, and time-consuming enrichment steps are needed. No single procedure is currently available which will recover all pathogenic serotypes (27). The low rates of isolation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples may be due to the limited sensitivity of culture methods (109). Using DNA-based methods, including PCR and DNA colony hybridization, this pathogen can be detected more rapidly and with greater sensitivity (62, 70, 123).


arrow
CULTURE METHODS
 
The source of Y. enterocolitica can markedly affect the methods of isolation. It is generally easier to find pathogenic isolates in clinical specimens from infected individuals than in asymptomatic carriers, foods, or environmental samples. In patients with acute gastroenteritis or organ abscesses, pathogenic Y. enterocolitica is often the dominant bacteria and can readily be isolated by direct plating on conventional enteric media (4). However, because of the small number of pathogenic strains of Yersinia in asymptomatic carriers and the large number of organisms in the background flora in food and environmental samples, direct isolation, even on selective media, is seldom successful. To increase the number of Yersinia strains in these samples, enrichment in liquid media prior to isolation on solid media is required (27). Several different methods available for isolation of Y. enterocolitica are presented in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Methods of isolation of Y. enterocolitica most commonly used for clinical, food, and environmental samples

Cold Enrichment

The psychrotrophic nature of Y. enterocolitica is unusual among other Enterobacteriaceae; consequently, enrichment in different solutions at 4°C for prolonged periods has been used for isolation of Yersinia spp. Cold enrichment in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or in phosphate-buffered saline with sorbitol and bile salts (PSB) has been widely used for clinical, food, and environmental samples (29, 53, 92, 95, 108, 137). Cold enrichment is effective for fecal samples in some studies (63, 82); however, major disadvantages are the presence of nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica and other psychrotrophic bacteria, which also multiply during enrichment, and the long incubation period, typically 21 days. By treating cold enrichments with potassium hydroxide (KOH), the background flora can sometimes be reduced, making selection of Yersinia colonies less laborious (132).

Selective Enrichment

Several selective media for isolation of Y. enterocolitica at higher temperatures have been developed with different antimicrobial agents used as selective supplements. Wauters (156) formulated a modified Rappaport broth (MRB), containing magnesium chloride, malachite green, and carbenicillin, in which the sample is incubated at 25°C for 2 to 4 days. Wauters et al. (158) subsequently developed an enrichment broth derived from the modified Rappaport base, supplemented with irgasan, ticarcillin, and potassium chlorate (ITC). Both media have been useful in recovery of strains of bioserotype 4/O:3 (29, 72, 85, 108, 158). Schiemann (130) developed a bile-oxalate-sorbose (BOS) medium for the isolation of Y. enterocolitica, particularly for bioserotype 1B/O:8 strains. Two lesser known enrichment procedures based on tryptic soy broth (TSB) have been proposed later. Landgraf et al. (87) used TSB with polymyxin and novobiocin (TSPN) and incubation at 18°C for 3 days for isolation of Y. enterocolitica in milk. Toora et al. (145) designed a two-step procedure for isolation of Y. enterocolitica from ready-to-eat foods and pork by using modified TSB containing yeast extract, bile salts, and irgasan.

Selective Agar Plates

Many different selective agar plating media are available for isolation of Y. enterocolitica from clinical, food, and environmental samples. Of the traditional enteric media, the most widely used is MacConkey (MAC) agar (13, 35, 39, 140). Cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin (CIN) agar (128) and Salmonella-Shigella deoxycholate calcium chloride (SSDC) agar (156) were developed specifically for the isolation of Y. enterocolitica. These are the two most commonly used media for food samples (39, 68, 112a). CIN agar is the most acceptable agar for clinical samples because of the high confirmation rate of presumptive isolates and its high selectivity for fecal specimens (4, 61). However, most strains of Y. enterocolitica of pathogenic bioserotype 3/O:3 are inhibited when samples are inoculated onto CIN medium (50). Three other selective agars, BABY4 (7), virulent Yersinia enterocolitica (VYE) (49), and KV202 (71) agars, developed for isolation of Y. enterocolitica, are not extensively used. Statens Serum Institute (SSI, Copenhagen, Denmark) enteric medium, a universal medium for recovery of enteric pathogens, is effective in detecting Yersinia spp. in fecal samples (17).

Identification

Devenish and Schiemann (32) determined that a minimum of two biochemical tests, the Kligler iron and Christensen urea tests, were required to identify Yersinia among bacteria with similar colony morphology on CIN agar. Y. enterocolitica can be identified by biochemical tests such as fermentation of sucrose, rhamnose, and melibiose (133). Commercial rapid identification tests provide suitable alternatives to conventional tube tests (93, 98, 111). The API 20E system, widely used for identification of presumptive Yersinia isolates, is accurate in identifying Y. enterocolitica (5, 111, 136). This kit system has a positive identification rate of 93% for Y. enterocolitica incubated at 28°C instead of 37°C (5).

Pathogenicity

Assessing the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica isolates, although the majority of isolates recovered from asymptomatic carriers, food, and environmental samples are nonpathogenic and have no clinical significance (76), is important since a correlation has been found between the serotype and biotype of this species and the ability to cause infection. Serotyping by using commercial O:3, O:5, O:8, and O:9 antisera has been used extensively; however, these antigens can sometimes be found in nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains and even in various Yersinia species (3). The biotyping scheme proposed by Wauters et al. (159) has been universally adopted. Pathogenic isolates can be differentiated from nonpathogenic isolates with the pyrazinamidase test (74), which is included in this biotyping scheme.

A number of phenotypic characteristics associated with the virulence plasmid have been described. Calcium dependence, measured by growth restriction on magnesium oxalate agar (14, 54), autoagglutination at 35 to 37°C (138), and uptake of Congo red (117, 120) and crystal violet (12) are the most popular indirect markers for identifying pathogenic isolates of Y. enterocolitica.

Because phenotypic tests are time-consuming and are not always reliable, DNA-based methods have been developed for pure culture. Several colony hybridization (31, 66, 120, 122) and PCR (1, 41, 65, 103, 118, 163) assays have been designed to verify the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica isolates specifically and rapidly. The methods are based on specific segments of the virulence plasmid (103, 163) or the chromosomal DNA (31, 41, 84, 103, 122, 155) that have known virulence functions. Aarts et al. (1) designed a duplex-PCR assay to simultaneously detect Y. enterocolitica and discriminate between pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains by using primers derived from enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences.


arrow
COLONY HYBRIDIZATION METHODS
 
Isolation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica is laborious, taking up to 4 weeks. Thus, several investigations have been undertaken to develop rapid and reliable methods for detection of pathogenic Yersinia strains from clinical, food, and environmental samples. By using DNA colony hybridization assays, pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains are detected using gene probes targeting the virulence plasmid (70, 100) or virulence-related DNA sequences in the chromosome (37, 55).

Probes based on nucleotide sequences from the virF and yadA genes on the virulence plasmid have been used by Kapperud et al. (79), Nesbakken et al. (109), and Weagant et al. (160). The regulatory virF gene plays a major role in the coordinated thermal induction of virulence determinants (21), while the yadA gene encodes a multifaceted outer membrane protein, YadA, which is an essential virulence factor of Y. enterocolitica (38). Goverde et al. (55) designed a colony hybridization method using probes targeting the chromosomal ail and inv genes, and Durisin et al. (37) designed a method involving the yst gene. ail codes for the membrane-associated protein Ail, which promotes invasion into eukaryotic cells and confers serum resistance (16, 102). The inv gene of Y. enterocolitica encodes a product that allows bacteria to invade epithelial cells (101). DNA homologous to the inv locus is found in all Y. enterocolitica strains, but nonpathogenic isolates do not contain functional inv sequences (115). The yst gene, found in Y. enterocolitica but not in Y. pseudotuberculosis or Y. pestis, encodes a heat-stable enterotoxin, Yst, thought to be involved in pathogenesis (25). Among other Yersinia species, Y. kristensenii has DNA homologous to yst (31).

Colony hybridization does not require isolation of pure cultures, and it enables the rapid detection and enumeration of all pathogenic bioserotypes. A high background flora does, however, reduce the efficiency of hybridization because target cells grow insufficiently strongly in the presence of a competing microflora (37). Despite this, Nesbakken et al. (109) found that the prevalence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in Norwegian pork products was substantially higher when tested by the colony hybridization method than by culturing.


arrow
PCR-BASED DETECTION METHODS
 
PCR is a promising method for detection of pathogens in clinical, food, and environmental samples. It is faster than colony hybridization method because growing isolated colonies before analysis is unnecessary. Different PCR assays have been designed for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. PCR methods developed for detection of Y. enterocolitica in clinical, food, and environmental samples

Target Genes

Several PCR assays have been developed to detect pYV-positive Y. enterocolitica in clinical, food, and environmental samples. Many of these methods use primers targeting the virF or yadA gene located on pYV (Table 2). Viitanen et al. (150) applied primers specific for the virulence plasmid coding the yopN (lcrE) gene of Y. enterocolitica O:3. The yopN is involved in the control of Yop release in pathogenic Y. enterocolitica (26). Arnold et al. (6) formulated a PCR assay based on the yopT gene, which encodes for YopT, an effector protein that induces a cytotoxic effect in macrophages (69).

Because of possible plasmid loss on subculture and storage (15), PCR methods targeting chromosomal virulence genes have also been created for natural samples. The ail gene, located in the chromosome of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains, is the most frequently used target (Table 2). In addition, some PCR assays have been designed to detect the inv and yst genes (Table 2). Weynants et al. (161) developed a PCR method to detect Y. enterocolitica O:3 in fecal samples; primers were designed to amplify a fragment of the rfbC gene. The Yersinia-specific region of the 16S rRNA gene has been used to detect Yersinia spp., especially in blood samples (Table 2).

Numerous PCR methods have been created to detect more than one Y. enterocolitica gene at the same time. The most common gene combination in these multiplex PCR assays has been virF and ail (Table 2). In these methods, samples contaminated with both pYV-positive and -negative isolates can be detected simultaneously. Lantz et al. (89) invented a multiplex PCR method to concurrently detect the plasmid-borne yadA gene and a Yersinia-specific region of the 16S rRNA gene. Two multiplex PCR methods using a mixture of primers against inv, ail, and virF have been designed to detect Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis in food and water (75, 103). Harnett et al. (59) developed a multiplex PCR to detect the yst, ail, and virF genes of Y. enterocolitica simultaneously in fecal samples. Weynants et al. (161) combined the rfbC, inv, ail, and virF genes in a multiplex PCR assay to differentiate Y. pseudotuberculosis, pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. enterocolitica O:3 in feces.

Sample Preparation

Although the PCR technique can be extremely effective with pure microbial cultures, its sensitivity is reduced when it is applied directly to natural samples. One important reason for this is the complex composition of such samples as feces, blood, cheese, chicken, and soil, which can inhibit PCR (88, 124). Proteinases, which destroy the DNA polymerase structure, have been suggested to be a significant group of PCR inhibitors in many biological samples (124). The PCR-inhibitory effect of feces is caused by several substances, one known group being bile salts (90, 148, 162). PCR inhibition observed in blood samples is caused mainly by heme and can be relieved by addition of bovine serum albumin (88). PCR inhibition observed in pork is caused mainly by heat-stable molecules that have passed through a 0.2-µm filter (89). Thus, different sample preparation steps have been recommended for different materials.

Several methods, including enrichment, dilution, filtration, centrifugation, and adsorption, have been used for concentration and separation of Y. enterocolitica strains in natural samples. An enrichment step prior to PCR, which increases sensitivity and ensures the detection of viable cells, has been applied in most procedures (Table 2). To inhibit the growth of the competing microflora, selective enrichment broth may be used (10, 20, 73, 89). Since food surfaces are the primary site of bacterial contamination, a nondestructive swabbing procedure for enrichment of Y. enterocolitica prior to PCR reduces the amount of nonspecific food-derived DNA and possible inhibitory factors in the food matrix (10).

A dilution step is recommended for heavily contaminated samples such as feces, food, and soil in order to reduce the number of inhibitory compounds and the high concentrations of nontarget DNA (78, 88). Waage et al. (153) have demonstrated that dilution after overnight enrichment is sometimes necessary prior to bacterial lysis to obtain a positive PCR result, presumably due to inhibition by the high DNA content in the enrichment broth.

A centrifugation step is generally used to concentrate Y. enterocolitica strains prior to PCR. The major drawback in centrifugation is the coconcentration of inhibitory particles together with the target organism (88). Buoyant density centrifugation is used to concentrate Y. enterocolitica strains and to remove PCR inhibitors (86, 89, 94). An immunomagnetic separation procedure has been used in some studies to concentrate and separate Y. enterocolitica O:3 from PCR inhibitors (79, 119). Filtration has been used to concentrate Y. enterocolitica strains in water samples (78, 126, 153).

DNA Extraction

DNA can be extracted from the cell either by lysing the cell wall to release the DNA or by using more laborious DNA purification procedures. Heat is routinely used, prior to PCR, to break down the cell wall of microbes and inactivate heat-labile PCR inhibitors (88). However, when natural samples are studied, heat treatment alone is insufficient for Y. enterocolitica (75). Proteinase K treatment is most commonly used before heat treatment in the PCR methods designed for direct detection of Y. enterocolitica in natural samples (Table 2). Proteinase K degrades cell wall proteins and PCR-inhibitory proteins and polypeptides in the sample and prevents heat-stable DNase contamination (96). Y. enterocolitica possesses nuclease activity to break down the PCR product; this can be prevented by proteinase K treatment prior to PCR (9, 104). Dickinson et al. (34) have shown that by increasing the amount of proteinase K from 0.2 to 1 mg per ml and by using isopropanol precipitation of DNA, Y. enterocolitica can efficiently be detected directly in raw chicken and cheese samples.

DNA purification has been carried out by traditional phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation in some PCR assays developed to detect Y. enterocolitica directly in natural samples (59, 112, 114a, 161). This method is, however, laborious, time-consuming, and unsuitable for large numbers of samples. Numerous commercial DNA purification kits are available to make DNA isolation faster and easier. Some of these kits have also been used in PCR assays designed for Y. enterocolitica (6, 11, 20, 73, 126, 134, 151).

Detection of PCR Products

The method most frequently used to detect PCR products of Y. enterocolitica is electrophoresis in an agarose gel (Table 2). This gives both the size and number of products and a rough estimation of the concentration. With this method, however, it is not possible to ensure that the PCR product contains the correct sequence between primers. In addition, ethidium bromide, which is a mutagen, is used to stain the agarose gel and may not be appropriate for routine use in food-monitoring laboratories. To overcome these problems, Rasmussen et al. (119) detected the amplified products of Y. enterocolitica by capture of the products using hybridization to an immobilized oligonucleotide. The immobilized PCR products in microtiter wells were detected with fluorescence. Recently, the 5'-nuclease PCR (TaqMan) assay, which no longer requires gel-based detection, has been used to detect Y. enterocolitica directly in food samples (20, 73, 151) and in blood (134). With this fluorogenic method, the probe is designed to hybridize with an internal region of the target sequence. When the probe hybridizes with its target, the reporter dye is cleaved and becomes capable of emitting a fluorescent signal that can be detected in real time. Aarts et al. (1) have developed an online rapid-cycling real-time PCR assay, using the SYBR Green I format to detect pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pure culture. The double-stranded DNA of the PCR product binds the SYBR Green I dye, and no internal probes are needed.

False-Positive Results

When traditional PCR detection with several manual steps is used, false-positive results due to cross-contamination may be a problem if specific precautions have not been taken into account (60). Carryover contamination in PCR assays can also result in false-positive results. However, these false-positive results can be monitored with a sufficient number of negative controls. False-positive results can also occur if the primers are not adequately specific, especially when low annealing temperatures are used or when sequences of target genes are also found in nonpathogenic strains. Grant et al. (56) have shown that strains of Y. enterocolitica of nonpathogenic biotype 1A can sometimes carry sequences homologous to the chromosomal virulence-associated genes ail, myf, and yst. False-positive results due to dead cells can be avoided by using an enrichment step prior to PCR. This ensures the detection of viable cells and increases sensitivity. Rasmussen et al. (119) have demonstrated that an enrichment step is needed before PCR to increase sensitivity when naturally contaminated samples are studied. A preenrichment step was also used in most procedures where pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was detected in natural samples (Table 2).

False-Negative Results

False-negative PCR results may occur more often than false-positive results when natural samples are studied (45, 46, 72). The main reason for false-negative results is the presence of inhibitor factors in food samples (88, 124). Enrichment media can also interfere with PCR detection; even a small amount of MgCl 2, which is found in both ITC and MRB broths, can be PCR inhibitory (124). To overcome this problem, Knutsson et al. (81) developed a PCR-compatible enrichment medium for Y. enterocolitica that makes sample treatment before PCR unnecessary. However, no easy method for overcoming PCR inhibition caused by natural samples has yet been discovered. False-negative results caused by inhibitory substances in the sample can be monitored by using an internal positive control (143). False-negative results can sometimes be caused by sequence heterogeneity of target genes between different Y. enterocolitica strains (20, 110).


arrow
OCCURRENCE IN NATURAL SAMPLES
 
Clinical Samples

Animals have long been suspected of being reservoirs for Y. enterocolitica and, hence, sources of human infection. Numerous studies have been carried out to isolate Y. enterocolitica strains from a variety of animals (64). However, most of the strains isolated from animal sources differ both biochemically and serogically from strains isolated from humans with yersiniosis. Human-pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica have frequently been isolated only from tonsils and fecal samples from slaughtered pigs (133).

Cold enrichment has commonly been used when studying samples from slaughtered pigs (Table 3). However, selective enrichment in ITC or MRB is clearly more productive than cold enrichment, especially when tonsils and mesenteric nodes were studied (29, 30, 43). These selective liquid media have been designed specifically for isolation of serotype O:3. MRB is inhibitory to some other pathogenic serotypes, particularly O:8 (130). In addition, De Zutter et al. (33) have shown that ITC is not optimal for recovery of serotype O:9. These problems can be overcome with nonselective or poorly selective cold enrichment. However, nonpathogenic isolates and other psychrotrophic bacteria also multiply during cold enrichment. Funk et al. (53) isolated Y. enterocolitica from 808 throat samples, only 107 of which harbored ail-positive Y. enterocolitica. Overnight enrichment at room temperature in nonselective broth provides an alternative to cold enrichment in finding asymptomatic carriers. Fredriksson-Ahomaa et al. (43) recovered pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains from all positive fecal samples after overnight enrichment in TSB. An enrichment step is generally needed for asymptomatic carriers, while direct plating is usually sufficient for patients with diarrhea because the number of Y. enterocolitica organisms excreted by the latter is relatively large (4). In Belgium, most laboratories have stopped using cold enrichment since it also increases the isolation of nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains (149).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in slaughtered pigs by culture methods

Studies have been conducted to compare culture and PCR methods for their ability to detect pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in tonsil and fecal samples (see Table 5). The detection rate was shown to be significantly higher with PCR, especially when fluorogenic 5'-nuclease PCR (TaqMan) assay was used (20). Boyapalle et al. (20) have reported that the TaqMan assay was 1,000 to 10,000 times more sensitive than the culture method or traditional PCR assay when fecal and tonsillar samples were studied. Sensitive methods are particularly necessary to detect pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in asymptomatic carriers, e.g., to study possible animal reservoirs for this pathogen. Rapid and sensitive methods are also needed to detect small numbers of Y. enterocolitica organisms and other bacteria in blood units used for transfusion or in asymptomatic blood donors (40, 135).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 5. Detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples by PCR and culture methods

Food Samples

Food has often been suggested to be the main source of Y. enterocolitica infection, although pathogenic isolates have seldom been recovered from food samples (28, 48, 113). Raw pork products have been widely investigated because of the association between Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3 and pigs. However, the isolation rate of pathogenic bioserotypes of Y. enterocolitica has been low in raw pork except for pig offal, with the most common type isolated being bioserotype 4/O:3 (Table 4). In these studies, selective enrichment in ITC and MRB has mostly been used. Y. enterocolitica strains belonging to bioserotypes associated with human disease have been recovered only a few times from beef, poultry, and milk samples (2, 51, 95). In these cases, cross-contamination has probably occurred during processing, packing, or handling since pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains have thus far never been recovered from live cattle or poultry.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4. Detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pork products by culture methods

The occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in some foods has been estimated by both culture and PCR methods (Table 5). In all of these studies, the prevalence was clearly higher by PCR than by culturing, showing the higher sensitivity of the former for naturally contaminated samples. For artificially contaminated pork, Boyapalle et al. (20) have shown that the TaqMan assay targeting the ail gene was 100 to 1,000 times more sensitive than the traditional PCR assay with gel-based detection and 10,000 times more sensitive than the culture method. Visnubhatla et al. (152) used the same TaqMan assay, but instead of ail, they targeted the yst gene. This was the first time when a high occurrence of yst-positive Y. enterocolitica was detected in retail ground beef. In the same study, the isolation rates of Y. enterocolitica in ground beef and pork were also elevated. The contamination level of these products was obviously very high, because the culture method used was able to identify Y. enterocolitica only when 106 CFU or more organisms per g were present (152). The occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was also shown to be clearly higher by the PCR assay than by culturing (Table 5).

Environmental Samples

Most of the Y. enterocolitica isolates recovered from environmental samples, including the slaughterhouse, fodder, soil, and water, have been nonpathogenic (8, 22, 24, 97, 125, 140). However, strains of bioserotype 4/O:3 have occasionally been isolated from the slaughterhouse (42, 107) and sewage water (23). Sandery et al. (126) and Fredriksson-Ahomaa et al. (47) have shown that compared with traditional PCR assays, culture methods underestimate the occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in environmental samples (Table 5).


arrow
CONCLUSIONS
 
Inefficient isolation methods have been the predominant reason for the low prevalence rates of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in earlier studies; the detection limit for pathogenic Y. enterocolitica is 103 to 106 CFU or more organisms per g in feces and pork samples. Thus, Yersinia-selective agar plates are insufficiently sensitive. In addition, nonpathogenic Y. enterocolitica colonies have the same appearance as pathogenic ones, which makes it difficult to select appropriate colonies for confirmation. While selective enrichment media are not selective enough, they do contain agents which inhibit the growth of some pathogenic strains. Thus, one reason why the most frequently recovered Y. enterocolitica strain is bioserotype 4/O:3 might be that the isolation methods favor this bioserotype.

PCR assays have provided a better estimation of the occurrence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in clinical, food, and environmental samples than have culture methods. Real-time PCR assays are rapid and sensitive methods for identification and enumeration of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in natural samples. Future improvements in real-time PCR assays that focus on incorporating positive internal controls and increasing the automation of the entire process will enhance the usefulness of this method in laboratory diagnostic and epidemiological studies, and the food industry. When sampling becomes automated, the sample-handling time will be reduced and cross-contamination will be minimized. However, effective isolation methods are also needed, because without isolation of Y. enterocolitica strains, no strain characterization can be performed, and with no strain characterization, important epidemiological information will be missing.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Hygiene and Technology of Food of Animal Origin, Veterinarstr. 13, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Phone: 49-89-2180 2699. Fax: +49-89-2180 3872. E-mail: mkufa{at}yahoo.com. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Aarts, H. J. M., R. G. Joosten, M. H. C. Henkens, H. Stegeman, and A. H. A. M. van Hoek. 2001. Rapid duplex PCR assay for the detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains. J. Microbiol. Methods 47:209-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Ackers, M. L., S. Schoenfeld, J. Markman, M. G. Smith, M. A. Nichols, and W. DeWitt. 2000. An outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica O:8 infections associated with pasteurised milk. J. Infect. Dis. 181:1834-1837.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Aleksic, S. 1995. Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica antigens O:3, O:9 and O:8 in different Yersinia species, their corresponding H antigens and origin. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 13:89-92.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Aleksic, S., and J. Bockemühl. 1999. Yersinia and other Enterobacteriaceae, p. 483-496. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
    5. 5
  5. Archer, J. R., R. F. Schell, D. R. Pennel, and P. D. Wick. 1987. Identification of Yersinia spp. with the API 20E system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:2398-2399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Arnold, T., A. Hensel, R. Hagen, S. Aleksic, H. Neubauer, and H. C. Scholz. 2001. A highly specific one-step PCR assay for the rapid discrimination of enteropathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica from pathogenic Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia pestis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 24:285-289.[CrossRef][Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Bercovier, H., J. Brault, S. Cohen, R. Melis, T. Lambert, and H. H. Mollaret. 1984. A new isolation medium for recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica from environmental sources. Curr. Microbiol. 10:121-124.
    8. 8
  8. Berzero, R., L. Volterra, and C. Chiesa. 1991. Isolation of Yersiniae from sewage. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 12:40-43.[Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Bhaduri, S., and B. Cottrell. 1997. Direct detection and isolation of plasmid-bearing virulent serotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica from various foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4952-4955.[Abstract]
    10. 10
  10. Bhaduri, S., and B. Cottrell. 1998. A simplified preparation method from various foods for PCR detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica: a possible model for other food pathogens. Mol. Cell. Probes 12:79-83.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Bhaduri, S., and A. R., Pickard. 1995. A method for isolation of chromosomal and plasmid DNA from Yersinia enterocolitica for simultaneous amplification by polymerase chain reaction: a possible model for other bacteria. J. Rapid Methods Automation Microbiol. 4:107-113.
    12. 12
  12. Bhaduri, S., L. K. Conway, and R. V. Lachica. 1987. Assay of crystal violet binding for rapid identification of virulent plasmid-bearing clones of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:1039-1042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Bhaduri, S., B. Cottrell, and A. R. Pickard. 1997. Use of single procedure for selective enrichment, isolation, and identification of plasmid-bearing virulent Yersinia enterocolitica of various serotypes from pork samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1657-1660.[Abstract]
    14. 14
  14. Bhaduri, S., C. Turner-Jones, M. M. Taylor, and R. V. Lachica. 1990. Simple assay of calcium dependency for virulent plasmid-bearing clones of Y. enterocolitica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:798-800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Blais, B. W., and L. M. Philippe. 1995. Comparative analysis of yadA and ail polymerase chain reaction methods for virulent Yersinia enterocolitica. Food Control 6:211-214.
    16. 16
  16. Bliska, J. B., and B. Falkow. 1992. Bacterial resistance to complement killing mediated by the Ail protein of Yersinia enterocolitica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:3561-3565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Blom, M., A. Meyer, P. Gerner-Smidt, K. Gaarslev, and F. Espersen. 1999. Evaluation of statens serum institute enteric medium for detection of enteric pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2312-2316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Bottone, E. J. 1997. Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:257-276.[Abstract]
    19. 19
  19. Bottone, E. J. 1999. Yersinia enterocolitica: overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microb. Infect. 1:323-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
    20. 20
  20. Boyapalle, S., I. V. Wesley, H. S. Hurd, and P. G. Reddy, 2001. Comparison of culture, multiplex, and 5' nuclease polymerase chain reaction assay for the rapid detection of Yersinia enterocolitica in swine and pork products. J. Food Prot. 64:1352-1361.[Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Brubaker, R. T. 1991. Factors promoting acute and chronic diseases caused by yersiniae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 4:309-324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Christensen, S. G. 1980. Yersinia enterocolitica in Danish pigs. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 48:377-382.[Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Christensen, S. G. 1987. The Yersinia enterocolitica situation in Denmark. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 9:93-97.[Medline]
    24. 24
  24. Cork, S. C., R. B. Marshall, P. Madie, and S. G. Fenwick. 1995. The role of wild birds and the environment in the epidemiology of Yersiniae in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 43:169-174.
    25. 25
  25. Cornelis, G. 1994. Yersinia pathogenicity factors. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 192:246-263.
    26. 26
  26. Cornelis, G. R., A. Boland, A. P. Boyd, C. Geuijen, M. Iriarte, C. Neyt, M. P. Sory, and I. Stainier. 1998. The virulence plasmid of Yersinia, an antihost genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1315-1352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. De Boer, E. 1992. Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 17:75-84.
    28. 28
  28. De Boer, E. 1995. Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from foods. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 13:71-73.[Medline]
    29. 29
  29. De Boer, E., and J. F. M. Nouws. 1991. Slaughter pigs and pork as a source of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 12:375-378.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. De Giusti, M., E. de Vito, A. Serra, B. Quattrucci, A. Boccia, L. Pacifico, A. Ranucci, G. Ravagnan, and C. Chiesa. 1995. Occurrence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in slaughtered pigs and pork products. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 13:126-129.[Medline]
    31. 31
  31. Delor, I. A., Kaeckenbeek, G. Wauters, and G. R. Cornelis. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of yst, the Yersinia enterocolitica gene encoding the heat-stable enterotoxin, and prevalence of the gene among pathogenic and non-pathogenic yersiniae. Infect. Immun. 58:2983-2988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    32. 32
  32. Devenish, J. A., and D. A. Schiemann. 1981. An abbreviated scheme for identification of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from food enrichment on CIN (cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin) agar. Can. J. Microbiol. 27:937-941.[Medline]
    33. 33
  33. De Zutter, L., L. Le Mort, M. Janssens, and G. Wauters. 1994. Short-coming of irgasan ticarcillin chlorate broth for the enrichment of Y. enterocolitica biotype 2, serotype O:9 from meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23:231-237.[CrossRef][Medline]
    34. 34
  34. Dickinson, J. H., R. G. Kroll, and K. A. Grant. 1995. The direct application of the polymerase chain reaction to DNA extraction from foods. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 20:212-216.[Medline]
    35. 35
  35. Doyle, M. P., and M. B. Hugdahl. 1983. Improved procedure for recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica from meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45:127-135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    36. 36
  36. Doyle, M. P., M. B. Hugdahl, and S. L. Taylor. 1981. Isolation of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica from porcine tongues. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42:661-666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    37. 37
  37. Durisin, M. D., A. Ibrahim, and M. W. Griffiths. 1997. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in milk and pork using a DIG-labelled probe targeted against the yst gene. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 37:103-112.[CrossRef][Medline]
    38. 38
  38. El Tahir, Y., and M. Skurnik. 2001. YadA, the multifaceted Yersinia adhesin. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:209-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
    39. 39
  39. Food and Drug Administration. 1992. Bacteriological analytical manual 7th ed., p. 95-109. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C.
    40. 40
  40. Feng, P., S. P. Keasler, and W. E. Hill. 1992. Direct identification of Yersinia enterocolitica in blood by polymerase chain reaction amplification. Transfusion 32:850-854.[CrossRef][Medline]
    41. 41
  41. Fenwick, S. G., and A. Murray. 1991. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by polymerase chain reaction. Lancet 337:496-497.
    42. 42
  42. Fransen, N. G., A. M. G. van den Elzen, B. A. P. Urlings, and P. G. H. Bijker. 1996. Pathogenic microorganisms in slaughterhouse sludge—a survey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 33:245-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
    43. 43
  43. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., M. Bucher, C. Hank, A. Stolle, and H. Korkeala. 2001. High prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica 4:O3 on pig offal in southern Germany: a slaughtering technique problem. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 24:457-463.[CrossRef][Medline]
    44. 44
  44. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., S. Hallanvuo, T. Korte, A. Siitonen, and H. Korkeala. 2001. Correspondence of genotypes of sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3 strains from human and porcine origin. Epidemiol. Infect. 127:37-47.[CrossRef][Medline]
    45. 45
  45. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., S. Hielm, and H. Korkeala. 1999. High prevalence of yadA-positive Yersinia enterocolitica in pig tongues and minced meat at retail level. J. Food Prot. 62:123-127.[Medline]
    46. 46
  46. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., J., Björkroth, S. Hielm, and H. Korkeala. 2000. Prevalence and characterisation of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in pig tonsils from different slaughterhouses. Food Microbiol. 17:93-101.
    47. 47
  47. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., T. Korte, and H. Korkeala. 2000. Contamination of carcasses, offals and the environment with yadA-positive Yersinia enterocolitica in a pig slaughterhouse. J. Food Prot. 63:31-35.[Medline]
    48. 48
  48. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., U. Lyhs, T. Korte, and H. Korkeala. 2001. Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in food samples at retail level in Finland. Arch. Lebensmittelhyg. 52:66-68.
    49. 49
  49. Fukushima, H. 1987. New selective agar medium for isolation of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:1068-1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    50. 50
  50. Fukushima, H., and M. Gomyoda. 1986. Growth of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 3B serotype O:3 inhibited on cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiocin agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:116-120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    51. 51
  51. Fukushima, H., K. Hoshina, H. Itowa, and M. Gomyoda. 1997. Introduction into Japan of pathogenic Yersinia through imported pork, beef and fowl. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 35:205-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
    52. 52
  52. Fukushima, H., K. Maruyama, I. Omori, K. Ito, and M. Iorihara. 1989. Role of the contaminated skin of pigs in faecal Yersinia contamination of pig carcasses at slaughter. Fleischwirtschaft 69:409-413.
    53. 53
  53. Funk, J. A., H. F. Troutt, R. E. Isaacson, and C. P. Fossler. 1998. Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in groups of swine at slaughter. J. Food Prot. 61:677-682.[Medline]
    54. 54
  54. Gemski, P., J. R. Lazere, and T. Casey. 1980. Plasmid associated with pathogenicity and calcium dependency of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 27:682-685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    55. 55
  55. Goverde, R. L. J., W. H., Jansen, H. A., Brunings, J. H. J. Huis in't Veld, and F. R. Mooi. 1993. Digoxigenin-labelled inv and ail probes for the detection and identification of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in clinical specimens and naturally contaminated pig samples. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74:301-313.[Medline]
    56. 56
  56. Grant, T., V. Bennet-Wood, and R. M. Robins-Browne. 1998. Identification of virulence-associated characteristics in clinical isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica lacking classical virulence markers. Infect. Immun. 66:1113-1120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    57. 57
  57. Gurgui Ferrer, M., B. Mirelis Otero, P. Coll Figa, and G. Prats. 1987. Yersinia enterocolitica infections and pork. Lancet ii:334.
    58. 58
  58. Hariharan, H., J. S., Giles, S. B., Heaney, S. M. Leclerc, and R. D. Schurman. 1995. Isolation, serotypes, and virulence-associated properties of Yersinia enterocolitica from the tonsils of slaughter hogs. Can. J. Vet. Res. 59:161-166.[Medline]
    59. 59
  59. Harnett, N., Y. P. Lin, and C. Krishnan. 1996. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica using the multiplex polymerase reaction. Epidemiol. Infect. 117:59-67.[Medline]
    60. 60
  60. Harris, L. J., and M. W. Griffiths. 1992. The detection of foodborne pathogens by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Food Res. Int. 25:457-469.[CrossRef]
    61. 61
  61. Head, C. B., D. A. Whitty, and S. Ratnam. 1982. Comparative study of selective media for recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 16:615-621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    62. 62
  62. Hill, W. E. 1996. The polymerase chain reaction: applications for the detection of foodborne pathogens. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 36:123-173.[Medline]
    63. 63
  63. Hoorfar, J., and C. B. F. Holmvig. 1999. Evaluation of culture methods for rapid screening of swine faecal samples for Yersinia enterocolitica O:3/biotype 4. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B 46:189-198.[CrossRef]
    64. 64
  64. Hurvell, B. 1981. Zoonotic Yersinia enterocolitica infection: host range, clinical manifestations, and transmission between animals and man, p. 145-159. In E. J. Bottone (ed.), Yersinia enterocolitica. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
    65. 65
  65. Ibrahim, A., W. Liesack, M. W. Griffiths, and R. M. Robins-Browne. 1997. Development of a highly specific assay for rapid identification of pathogenic strains of Yersinia enterocolitica based on PCR amplification of the Yersinia heat-stable enterotoxin gene (yst). J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1636-1638.[Abstract]
    66. 66
  66. Ibrahim, A., W. Liesack, and E. Stackebrand. 1992. Differentiation between pathogenic and non-pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains by colony hybridisation with a PCR-mediated digoxigenin-dUTP-labelled probe. Mol. Cell. Probes 6:163-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
    67. 67
  67. Ibrahim, A., W. Liesack, and E. Stackebrand. 1992. Polymerase chain reaction-gene probe detection system specific for pathogenic strains of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1942-1947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    68. 68
  68. International Organisation for Standardisation. 1994. Microbiology—general guidance for the detection of presumptive pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. ISO 10273. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
    69. 69
  69. Iriarte, M., and G. R. Cornelis. 1998. YopT, a new Yersinia Yop effector protein, affects the cytoskeleton of host cells. Mol. Microbiol. 29:915-929.[CrossRef][Medline]
    70. 70
  70. Jagow, J., and W. E. Hill. 1986. Enumeration by DNA colony hybridisation of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica colonies in artificially contaminated food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:441-443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    71. 71
  71. Jiang, G. C., D. H. Kang, and D. Y. C. Fung. 2000. Enrichment procedure and plating media for isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Food Prot. 63:1483-1486.[Medline]
    72. 72
  72. Johannessen, G. S., G. Kapperud, and H. Kruse. 2000. Occurrence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Norwegian pork products determined by a PCR method and a traditional culturing method. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 54:75-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
    73. 73
  73. Jourdan, A. D., S. C. J. Johnson, and I. V. Wesley. 2000. Development of a fluorogenic 5' nuclease PCR assay for detection of the ail gene of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3750-3755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    74. 74
  74. Kandolo, K., and G. Wauters. 1985. Pyrazinamidase activity in Yersinia enterocolitica and related organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:980-982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    75. 75
  75. Kaneko, S., N. Ishizaki, and Y. Kokubo. 1995. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis from pork using polymerase chain reaction. Contr. Microbiol. Immunol. 13:153-155.[Medline]
    76. 76
  76. Kapperud, G. 1991. Yersinia enterocolitica in food hygiene. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 12:53-66.[CrossRef][Medline]
    77. 77
  77. Kapperud, G., K., Dommarsnes, M. Skurnik, and M. Hornes. 1990. A synthetic oligonucleotide probe and a cloned polynucleotide probe based on the yopA gene for detection and enumeration of virulent Yersinia enterocolitica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:17-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    78. 78
  78. Kapperud, G., and T. Vardund. 1995. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in food, water, and feces by nested polymerase chain reactions and immunomagnetic separation. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 13:130-133.[Medline]
    79. 79
  79. Kapperud, G., T. Vardund, E. Skjerve, E. Hornes, and T. E. Michaelsen. 1993. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in foods and water by immunomagnetic separation, nested polymerase chain reactions, and colorimetric detection of amplified DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:2938-2944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    80. 80
  80. Karib, H., and H. Seeger. 1994. Vorkommen von Yersinien- und Campylobacter-Arten in Lebensmitteln. [Presence of Yersinia and Campylobacter spp. in foods.] Fleischwirtschaft 74:1104-1106.
    81. 81
  81. Knutsson, R., M. Fontanesi, H. Grage, and P. Rådström. 2002. Development of PCR-compatible enrichment medium for Yersinia enterocolitica: amplification precision and dynamic detection range during cultivation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 72:185-201.[CrossRef][Medline]
    82. 82
  82. Kontiainen, S., A. Sivonen, and O. V. Renkonen. 1994. Increased yields of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica strains by cold enrichment. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 26:685-691.[Medline]
    83. 83
  83. Kwaga, J., and J. O. Iversen. 1992. Laboratory investigation of virulence among strains of Yersinia enterocolitica and related species isolated from pigs and pork products. Can. J. Microbiol. 38:92-97.[Medline]
    84. 84
  84. Kwaga, J., J. O. Iversen, and V. Misra. 1992. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by polymerase chain reaction and digoxigenin-labelled polynucleotide probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2668-2673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    85. 85
  85. Kwaga, J., J. O. Iversen, and J. R. Saunders. 1990. Comparison of two enrichment protocols for the detection of Yersinia in slaughtered pigs and pork products. J. Food Prot. 53:1047-1049.
    86. 86
  86. Lambertz, S. T., R. Lindqvist, A. Ballagi-Pordany, and M. L. Danielsson-Tham. 2000. A combined culture and PCR method for detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 57:63-73.[CrossRef]
    87. 87
  87. Landgraf, M., S. T. Iaria, and D. P. Falcao. 1993. An improved procedure for the isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica and related species from milk. J. Food Prot. 56:447-450.
    88. 88
  88. Lantz, P. G., B. Hahn-Hägerdal, and P. Rådström. 1994. Sample preparation methods in PCR-based detection of food pathogens. Trends. Food Sci. Technol. 5:384-389.[CrossRef]
    89. 89
  89. Lantz, P. G., R. Knutsson, Y. Blixt, W. Abu Al-Soud, E. Borch, and P. Rådström. 1999. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in enrichment media and pork by a multiplex-PCR: a study of sample preparation and PCR-inhibitory components. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 45:93-105.
    90. 90
  90. Lantz, P. G., M. Matsson, T. Wadström, and P. Rådström. 1997. Removal of PCR inhibitors from human fecal samples through the use of an aqueous two-phase system for sample preparation prior to PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 28:159-167.[CrossRef]
    91. 91
  91. Lee, W. H., M. E. Harris, D. McClain, R. E. Smith, and R. W. Johnston. 1980. Two modified selenite media for the recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica from meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:205-209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    92. 92
  92. Letellier, A., S. Messier, and S. Quessy. 1999. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in finishing swine at Canadian abattoir. J. Food Prot. 62:22-25.[Medline]
    93. 93
  93. Linde, H. J., H. Neubauer, H. Meyer, S. Aleksic, and N. Lehn. 1999. Identification of Yersinia species by the Vitek GNI card. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:211-214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    94. 94
  94. Lindqvist, R., B. Norling, and S. Thistedt Lambertz. 1997. A rapid sample preparation method for PCR detection of food pathogens based on buoyant density centrifugation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 24:306-310.[CrossRef][Medline]
    95. 95
  95. Logue, C. M., J. J. Sheridan, G. Wauters, D. A. Mc Dowell, and I. S. Blair. 1996. Yersinia spp. and numbers, with particular reference to Y. enterocolitica bio/serotypes, occurring on Irish meat and meat products, and the influence of alkali treatment on their isolation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 33:257-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
    96. 96
  96. Maas, M., and K. Dahlhoff. 1994. Comparison of sample preparation methods for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2616-2619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    97. 97
  97. Mafu, A. A. Higgins, M. Nadeau, and G. Cousineau. 1989. The incidence of Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia enterocolitica in swine carcasses and the slaughterhouse environment. J. Food Prot. 52:642-645.
    98. 98
  98. Manafi, M., and E. Holzhammer. 1994. Comparison of the Vitek, API 20E and Gene-Track systems for identification of Yersinia enterocolitica. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 18:90-92.
    99. 99
  99. Mehlman, I. J., C. C. G. Auliso, and A. C. Sanders. 1978. Problems in the recovery and identification of Yersinia from food. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 61:761-771.[Medline]
    100. 100
  100. Miliotis, M. D., J. E. Galen, J. B. Kaper, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1989. Development and testing of a synthetic oligonucleotide probe for the detection of pathogenic Yersinia strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:1667-1670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    101. 101
  101. Miller, V. L., and S. Falkow. 1988. Evidence for two genetic loci in Yersinia enterocolitica that can promote invasion of epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 56:1242-1248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    102. 102
  102. Miller, V. L., J. J. Farmer III, W. E. Hill, and S. Falkow. 1989. The ail locus is found uniquely in Yersinia enterocolitica serotypes commonly associated with disease. Infect. Immun. 57:121-131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    103. 103
  103. Nakajima, H., M. Inoue, T. Mori, K. I. Itoh, E. Arakawa, and H. Watanabe. 1992. Detection and identification of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by an improved polymerase chain reaction method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2484-2486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    104. 104
  104. Nakajima, H., K. I. Itoh, E. Arakawa, M. Inoue, T. Mori, and H. Watanabe. 1994. Degradation of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product by heat-stable deoxyribonuclease (DNase) produced from Yersinia enterocolitica. Microbiol. Immunol. 38:153-156.[Medline]
    105. 105
  105. Reference deleted.
    106. 106
  106. Nesbakken, T. 1985. Comparison of sampling and isolation procedures for recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:3 from the oral cavity of slaughter pigs. Acta Vet. Scand. 26:127-135.[Medline]
    107. 107
  107. Nesbakken, T. 1988. Enumeration of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 from the porcine oral cavity, and its occurrence on cut surface of pig carcasses and the environment in a slaughterhouse. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 6:287-293.[CrossRef][Medline]
    108. 108
  108. Nesbakken, T., B. Gondrosen, and G. Kapperud. 1985. Investigation of Yersinia enterocolitica-like bacteria, and thermotolerant campylobacters in Norwegian pork products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1:311-320.
    109. 109
  109. Nesbakken, T., G. Kapperud, K. Dommarsnes, M. Skurnik, and E. Hornes. 1991. Comparative study of a DNA hybridisation method and two isolation procedures for detection of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in naturally contaminated pork products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:389-394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    110. 110
  110. Neubauer, H., A. Hensel, S. Aleksic, and H. Meyer. 2000. Evaluation of Yersinia adhesion gene (yadA) specific PCR for the identification of enteropathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. In. J. Food Microbiol. 57:225-227.[CrossRef]
    111. 111
  111. Neubauer, H., T. Sauer, H. Becker, S. Aleksic, and H. Meyer. 1998. Comparison of systems for identification and differentiation of species within the genus Yersinia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:3366-3368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    112. 112
  112. Nilsson, A., S. T. Lambertz, P. Stålhandske, P. Norberg, and M. L. Danielsson-Tham. 1998. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica in food by PCR amplification. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26:140-141.[CrossRef][Medline]
    113. 112
  113. Nordic Committee on Food Analysis. 1996. Yersinia enterocolitica. Detection in foods. Method no. 117, 3rd ed. Nordic Committee on Food Analysis, Espoo, Finland.
    114. 113
  114. Ostroff, S. 1995. Yersinia as an emerging infection: epidemiologic aspects of yersiniosis. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 13:5-10.[Medline]
    115. 114
  115. Ostroff, S. M., G. Kapperud, L. C. Huteagner, T. Nesbakken, N. H. Bean, J. Lassen, and R. V. Tauxe. 1994. Sources of sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica infections in Norway: a prospective case-control study. Epidemiol. Infect. 112:133-141.[Medline]
    116. 114
  116. Özbas, Z. Y., A. Lehner, and M. Wagner. 2000. Development of a multiplex and semi-nested PCR assay for detection of Yersinia enterocolitica and Aeromonas hydrophila in raw milk. Food Microbiol. 17:197-203.[CrossRef]
    117. 115
  117. Pierson, D. E., and S. Falkow. 1990. Nonpathogenic isolates of Y. enterocolitica do not contain functional inv-homologous sequences. Infect. Immun. 58:1059-1064.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    118. 116
  118. Portnoy, D. A., and R. J. Martinez. 1985. Role of a plasmid in the pathogenicity of Yersinia species. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 118:29-51.[Medline]
    119. 117
  119. Prpic, J. K., R. M. Robins-Browne, and R. B. Davey. 1983. Differentiation between virulent and avirulent Yersinia enterocolitica isolates by using Congo red agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 18:486-490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    120. 118
  120. Rasmussen, H. N., O. F. Rasmussen, J. K. Andersen, and J. E. Olsen. 1994. Specific detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by two-step PCR using hot-start and DMSO. Mol. Cell. Probes 8:99-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
    121. 119
  121. Rasmussen, H. N., O. F. Rasmussen, H. Christensen, and J. E. Olsen. 1995. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 in faecal samples and tonsil swabs from pigs using IMS and PCR. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 78:563-568.[Medline]
    122. 120
  122. Riley, G., and S. Toma. 1989. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by using Congo red-magnesium oxalate agar medium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:213-214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    123. 121
  123. Robins-Browne, R. M. 1997. Yersinia enterocolitica, p. 192-215. In M. P. Doyle, L. R. Beuchat and T. J. Montville (ed.), Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
    124. 122
  124. Robins-Browne, R. M., M. D. Miliotis, S. Cianciosi, V. L. Miller, S. Falkow, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1989. Evaluation of DNA colony hybridization and other techniques for detection of virulence in Yersinia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:644-650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    125. 123
  125. Rodriguez, J. M. 1997. Detection of animal pathogens by using the polymerase chain reacion (PCR). Vet. J. 153:287-305.[CrossRef][Medline]
    126. 124
  126. Rossen, L., P. Nrskov, K. Holmstrøm, and O. F. Rasmussen. 1992. Inhibition of PCR by components of food samples, microbial diagnostic assays and DNA-extraction solutions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 17:37-45.[CrossRef][Medline]
    127. 125
  127. Sammarco, M. L., G. Ripabelli, A. Ruberto, G. Iannitto, and G. M. Grasso. 1997. Prevalence of Salmonellae, Listeriae, and Yersiniae in the slaughterhouse environment and on work surfaces, equipment, and workers. J. Food Prot. 60:367-371.
    128. 126
  128. Sandery, M., T. Stinear, and C. Kaucner. 1996. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in environmental water by PCR. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 80:327-332.[Medline]
    129. 127
  129. Satterthwaite, P., K. Pritchard, D. Floyd, and B. Law. 1999. A case-control study of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in Auckland. Aust. N. Z. Public Health 23:482-485.[Medline]
    130. 128
  130. Schiemann, D. A. 1979. Synthesis of a selective agar medium for Yersinia enterocolitica. Can. J. Microbiol. 25:1298-1304.[Medline]
    131. 129
  131. Schiemann, D. A. 1980. Isolation of toxigenic Yersinia enterocolitica from retail pork products. J. Food Prot. 43:360-365.
    132. 130
  132. Schiemann, D. A. 1982. Development of a two-step enrichment procedure for recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica from foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43:14-27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    133. 131
  133. Schiemann, D. A. 1983. Comparison of enrichment and plating media for recovery of virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica from inoculated beef stew. J. Food Prot. 46:957-964.
    134. 132
  134. Schiemann, D. A. 1983. Alkalotolerance of Yersinia enterocolitica as basis for selective isolation from food enrichments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46:22-27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    135. 133
  135. Schiemann, D. A. 1989. Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, p. 601-672. In M. P. Doyle (ed.), Foodborne bacterial pathogens. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
    136. 134
  136. Sen, K. 2000. Rapid identification of Yersinia enterocolitica in blood by the 5' nuclease PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1953-1958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    137. 135
  137. Sen, K., and D. M. Asher. 2001. Multiplex PCR for detection of Enterobacteriaceae in blood. Transfusion 41:1356-1364.[CrossRef][Medline]
    138. 136
  138. Sharma, N. K., P. W. Doyle, S. A. Gerbasi, and J. H. Jessop. 1990. Identification of Yersinia species by API 20E. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1443-1444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    139. 137
  139. Shiozawa, K., M. Akiyama, K. Sahara, M. Hayashi, T. Nishina, M. Murakami, and Y. Asakawa, 1987. Pathogenicity of Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 3B and 4, serotype O:3 isolates from pork samples and humans. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 9:30-40.[Medline]
    140. 138
  140. Skurnik, M., I. Böli, H. Heikkinen, S. Piha, and H. Wolf-Watz. 1984. Virulence plasmid-associated autoagglutination in Yersinia spp. J. Bacteriol. 158:1033-1036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    141. 139
  141. Smego, R. A., J. Frean, and H. J. Koornhof. 1999. Yersiniosis I: microbiological and clinicoepidemiological aspects of plague and non-plague Yersinia infections. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18:1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
    142. 140
  142. Sulakvelidze, A., K. Dalakishvili, E. Barry, G. Wauters, R. Robins-Browne, P. Imnadze, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1996. Analysis of clinical and environmental Yersinia isolates in the Republic of Georgia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2325-2327.[Abstract]
    143. 141
  143. Tauxe, R. V., G. Wauters, V. Goossens, R. van Noyen, J. Vandepitte, M. Martin, P. de Moel, and G. Tiers. 1987. Yersinia enterocolitica infections and pork: the missing link. Lancet i:1129-1132.
    144. 142
  144. Thibodeau, V., E. H., Frost, S. Chénier, and S. Quessay. 1999. Presence of Yersinia enterocolitica in tissues of orally inoculated pigs and the tonsils and faeces of pigs at slaughter. Can. J. Vet. Res. 63:96-100.[Medline]
    145. 143
  145. Thisted Lambertz, S., A. Ballagi-Pordány, and R. Lindqvist. 1998. A mimic as internal standard to monitor PCR analysis of foodborne pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26:9-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
    146. 144
  146. Thisted Lambertz, S., A. Ballagi-Pordány, A. Nilsson, P. Nordberg, and M. L. Danielsson-Tham. 1996. A comparison between a PCR method and a conventional culture method for detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in foods. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81:303-308.[Medline]
    147. 145
  147. Toora, S., E. Budu-Amoako, R. F. Ablett, and J. Smith. 1994. Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica from ready-to-eat foods and pork by a simple two step procedure. Food Microbiol. 11:369-374.[CrossRef]
    148. 146
  148. Trebesius, K., D. Harmsen, A. Rakin, J. Schmelz, and J. Heesemann. 1998. Development of rRNA-targeted PCR and in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides for detection of Yersinia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2557-2564.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    149. 147
  149. Tsai, S. J., and L. H. Chen. 1991. Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica in pork products from Northern Taiwan. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 12:56-62.[Medline]
    150. 148
  150. Uwatoko, K., M. Sunairi, A. Yamamoto, M. Nakajima, and K. Yamaura. 1996. Rapid and efficient method to eliminate substances inhibitory to the polymerase chain reaction from animal fecal samples. Vet. Microbiol. 52:73-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
    151. 149
  151. Verhaegen, J., J. Charlier, P. Lemmens, M. Delmée, R. Van Noyen, L. Verbist, and G. Wauters. 1998. Surveillance of human Yersinia enterocolitica infections in Belgium: 1967-1996. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27:59-65.[Medline]
    152. 150
  152. Viitanen, A. M., P. Arstila, R. Lahesmaa, K. Granfors, M. Skurnik, and P. Toivanen. 1991. Application of the polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence techniques to the detection of bacteria in Yersinia-triggered reactive arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 34:89-96.[Medline]
    153. 151
  153. Vishnubhatla, A., D. Y. C. Fung, R. D. Oberst, M. P. Hays, T. G. Nagaraja, and S. J. A. Flood. 2000. Rapid 5' nuclease (TaqMan) assay for detection of virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4131-4135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    154. 152
  154. Vishnubhatla, A., R. D. Oberst, D. Y. C. Fung, W. Wonglumsom, M. P. Hays, and T. G. Nagaraja. 2001. Evaluation of a 5'-nuclease (TaqMan) assay for the detection of virulent strains of Yersinia enterocolitica in raw meat and tofu samples. J. Food Prot. 64:355-360.[Medline]
    155. 153
  155. Waage, A. S., T. Vardund, V. Lund, and G. Kapperud. 1999. Detection of low numbers of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in environmental water and sewage samples by nested polymerase chain reaction. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:814-821.[CrossRef][Medline]
    156. 154
  156. Wang, R. F., W. W. Cao, and C. E. Cerniglia. 1997. A universal protocol for PCR detection of 13 species of foodborne pathogens in foods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 83:727-736.[CrossRef][Medline]
    157. 155
  157. Wannet, W. J. B., M. Reessink, H. A. Brunings, and H. M. E. Maas. 2001. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by rapid and sensitive duplex assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4483-4486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    158. 156
  158. Wauters, G. 1973. Improved methods for the isolation and the recognition of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 2:68-70.
    159. 157
  159. Wauters, G. 1979. Carriage of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 3 by pigs as a source of human infection. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 5:249-252.[Medline]
    160. 158
  160. Wauters, G., V. Goossens, M. Janssens, and J. Vandepitte. 1988. New enrichment method for isolation of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica serogroup O:3 from pork. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:851-854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    161. 159
  161. Wauters, G., K. Kandolo, and M. Janssens. 1987. Revised biogrouping scheme of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 9:14-21.[Medline]
    162. 160
  162. Weagant, S. D., J. A. Jakow, K. C. Jinneman, C. J. Omiecinski, C. A. Kaysner, and W. E. Hill. 1999. Development of digoxigenin-labelled PCR amplicon probes for use in the detection and identification of enteropathogenic Yersinia and shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli from foods. J. Food Prot. 62:438-443.[Medline]
    163. 161
  163. Weynants, V., V. Jadot, P. Denoel, A. Tibor, and J. J. Letesson. 1996. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serogroup O:3 by a PCR method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1224-1227.[Abstract]
    164. 162
  164. Wilde, J., J. Eiden, and R. Yolken. 1990. Removal of inhibitory substances from human fecal specimens for detection of group A rotaviruses by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reactions. J. Clin Microbiol. 28:1300-1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    165. 163
  165. Wren, B. W., and S. Tabaqchali. 1990. Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica by the polymerase chain reaction. Lancet 336:693.[Medline]

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, April 2003, p. 220-229, Vol. 16, No. 2
0893-8512/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.220-229.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lambertz, S. T., Nilsson, C., Hallanvuo, S., Lindblad, M. (2008). Real-Time PCR Method for Detection of Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 6060-6067 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Laukkanen, R., Martinez, P. O., Siekkinen, K.-M., Ranta, J., Maijala, R., Korkeala, H. (2008). Transmission of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in the Pork Production Chain from Farm to Slaughterhouse. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 5444-5450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Falcao, J. P., Falcao, D. P., Pitondo-Silva, A., Malaspina, A. C., Brocchi, M. (2006). Molecular typing and virulence markers of Yersinia enterocolitica strains from human, animal and food origins isolated between 1968 and 2000 in Brazil.. J Med Microbiol 55: 1539-1548 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M., Stolle, A., Siitonen, A., Korkeala, H. (2006). Sporadic human Yersinia enterocolitica infections caused by bioserotype 4/O : 3 originate mainly from pigs. J Med Microbiol 55: 747-749 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Howard, S. L., Gaunt, M. W., Hinds, J., Witney, A. A., Stabler, R., Wren, B. W. (2006). Application of Comparative Phylogenomics To Study the Evolution of Yersinia enterocolitica and To Identify Genetic Differences Relating to Pathogenicity.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 3645-3653 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Muniesa, M., Blanch, A. R., Lucena, F., Jofre, J. (2005). Bacteriophages May Bias Outcome of Bacterial Enrichment Cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 4269-4275 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Thisted Lambertz, S., Danielsson-Tham, M.-L. (2005). Identification and Characterization of Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica Isolates by PCR and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 3674-3681 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Korkeala, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Korkeala, H.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»