Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Clinical Microbiology Reviews, January 2007, p. 79-114, Vol. 20, No. 1
0893-8512/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/CMR.00015-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Unité des Agents Antibactériens, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15,1 Université Paris VI, INSERM U655-Laboratoire de Recherche Moléculaire sur les Antibiotiques, Paris,2 Service de Microbiologie and EA 2128 Relations Hote et Microorganismes des Epitheliums, CHU Côte de Nâcre, Université de Caen-Basse Normandie, Caen,France3
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION REGULATION OF RESISTANCE EXPRESSION BY TWO-COMPONENT SYSTEMS IN GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA Two-Component Regulatory Systems Resistance to Glycopeptides in Enterococci Two-component regulatory systems in Van-type enterococci. Phosphotransfer reactions catalyzed by VanRS and VanRBSB two-component systems. In vitro binding of VanR and VanRB to promoter regulatory regions. VanRB-P recruits the RNA polymerase to the regulatory and resistance gene promoters. In vivo activation of the PR and PH promoters in VanA-type strains. Acquisition of teicoplanin resistance by VanB-type enterococci. (i) Inducible phenotype. (ii) Constitutive phenotype. (iii) Heterogeneous phenotype. Resistance to Glycopeptides in Staphylococcus aureus Resistance to ß-Lactams in Enterococcus faecalis Resistance by Efflux Resistance to quinolones in Staphylococcus aureus. Resistance to multiple drugs in gram-negative bacteria. (i) Acinetobacter baumannii. (ii) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. (iii) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. (iv) Escherichia coli. ROLE OF IS ELEMENTS AND INTEGRONS IN THE MODULATION OF RESISTANCE GENE EXPRESSION Effects of IS Elements on the Expression of Resistance General characteristics of IS elements. IS-mediated effects on resistance-conferring and resistance-modulating genes. (i) Activation of resistance genes by promoter alterations. (ii) Disruption of resistance-modulating genes. Modulation of Resistance Gene Expression in Class 1 Integrons General characteristics of integrons. Transcriptional control of resistance gene expression in class 1 integrons. (i) Impact of the integron-borne promoter region. (ii) Impact of the cassette-borne 59-be. (iii) Transcription independent of integron-specific sequences. Translational control of gene expression in class 1 integrons. POSTTRANSCRIPTIONAL (TRANSLATIONAL) ATTENUATION Inducible Expression of Macrolide Resistance The erm(C) paradigm. Control of expression of other erm genes. Phenotypes of inducible MLSB resistance. Constitutive Expression of erm Genes Clinical Implications of Inducible MLSB Resistance What is the clinical evidence for failure of clindamycin treatment? Implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory. CONCLUSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematicrepresentation of a two-component regulatory system. Structural
features of sensor (top) and regulator (bottom) proteins. H, N, G1, F,
and G2 refer to the motifs conserved in histidine protein kinases and
are shown as hatched blue boxes. The phosphorylated histidine is nested
in a highly conserved sequence termed the H box, close to the
N-terminal border of the conserved kinase domain. The G1 and G2 domains
are glycine rich and resemble nucleotide binding motifs seen in other
proteins. The sequences of the remaining D and F boxes reveal little
about their possible functions. In the regulator, the central aspartate
is the site of phosphorylation, whereas the amino-terminal pair is
probably important for catalysis. The conserved lysine may be involved
in effecting the phosphorylation-induced conformational changes that
regulate output activity. Asp, aspartate; His, histidine; P, phosphate;
dotted blue box, sensor domain; blue box, transmembrane domain; white
box, kinase domain; horizontally striped green box, receiver domain;
checkerboard green box, effector domain. a.a., amino
acids.
|
Glycopeptide resistance in enterococci results from the production of modified peptidoglycan precursors ending in D-Ala-D-Lac (VanA, VanB, and VanD) or D-Ala-D-Ser (VanC, VanE, and VanG), to which glycopeptides exhibit low binding affinities, and from the elimination of the high-affinity precursors ending in D-Ala-D-Ala and synthesized by the host Ddl ligase (17, 218). In enterococci with the VanA, VanB, or VanD phenotype, the synthesis of D-Ala-D-Lac requires the presence of a ligase (VanA, VanB, or VanD) of altered specificity compared to the host Ddl ligase and of a dehydrogenase (VanH, VanHB, or VanHD) that converts pyruvate to D-Lac (Fig. 2)(19). In VanC-, VanE-, and VanG-type strains, the ligase genes (vanC, vanE, or vanG) encode a protein catalyzing the synthesis of D-Ala-D-Ser (218), and the production of D-Ser is due to a membrane-bound serine racemase (VanT, VanTE, or VanTG) (Fig. 2) (1, 11, 63).
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Comparison
of the van gene clusters. Open arrows represent coding
sequences (red arrows, regulatory genes; purple arrows, genes required
for resistance; blue arrows, accessory genes; pink and yellow arrows,
genes of unknown function) and indicate the direction of transcription.
The percentages of amino acid (aa) identity between the deduced
proteins of reference strains BM4147 (VanA)
(19), V583 (VanB)
(77), BM4339 (VanD)
(42), BM4174 (VanC)
(10), BM4405 (VanE)
(1), and BM4518 (VanG)
(63) are indicated under
the arrows. The vertical bar in vanYG indicates the
frameshift mutation leading to a predicted truncated protein. NA, not
applicable.
|
Classification of glycopeptide resistance is based on the primary sequence of the structural genes for the resistance-mediating ligases. VanA-type strains display high-level inducible resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin, whereas VanB-type strains have variable levels of inducible resistance to vancomycin only, since teicoplanin is not an inducer (15, 211). VanD-type strains are characterized by constitutive resistance to moderate levels of both glycopeptides (66, 67). VanC, VanE, and VanG are resistant to low levels of vancomycin but remain susceptible to teicoplanin (63, 80, 135). VanC- and VanE-type strains are inducibly or constitutively resistant (2, 187). In several constitutive strains of these types, various mutations in VanS could, as in VanB-type strains, account for constitutivity (26, 65).
Although all six types of resistance involve genes encoding related enzymatic functions, they can be distinguished by the location of the genes and by the various modes of regulation of gene expression (Fig. 2). The vanA and vanB operons are located on plasmids or in the chromosome (20), whereas the vanD (42, 66, 67), vanG (63), vanE (1), and vanC (10) operons have so far been found exclusively in the chromosome.
Two-component regulatory systems in Van-type enterococci. Among the ubiquitous two-component systems that constitute one of the largest families of transcriptional regulators in bacteria, the VanS/VanR-type systems are the only ones that control the expression of genes that mediate antibiotic resistance. Expression of VanA-, VanB-, VanD-, VanC-, VanE-, and VanG-type resistance is regulated by a VanS/VanR-type two-component signal transduction system composed of a membrane-bound histidine kinase (VanS, VanSB, VanSD, VanSC, VanSE, or VanSG) and a cytoplasmic response regulator (VanR, VanRB, VanRD, VanRC, VanRE, or VanRG) that acts as a transcriptional activator (Fig. 2) (1, 10, 18, 42, 63, 66, 67, 77). In the vanA, vanB, vanD, and vanG operons, the genes for the two-component regulatory system (vanRS, vanRBSB, vanRDSD, and vanRGSG) are present upstream from the structural genes for the resistance proteins (20, 42, 63, 67), whereas in the vanC and vanE clusters, vanRCSC and vanRESE are located downstream (Fig. 2) (1, 10). The regulatory and resistance genes in the vanA, vanB, and vanD operons are transcribed from distinct promoters, PR, PRB, and PRD and PH, PYB, and PYD, respectively, that are coordinately regulated (13, 14, 43, 65, 77). The vanC and vanE clusters are cotranscribed from a single upstream promoter (Fig. 2) (1, 2, 187).
The vanRG and vanSG genes have the highest homology with vanRD and vanSD, respectively (Fig. 2). Additionally, vanUG encodes a predicted transcriptional activator (63), and a protein of this type has not previously been associated with glycopeptide resistance. Thus, as opposed to the other van gene clusters, the vanG operon contains three genes, vanUG, vanRG, and vanSG, for a putative regulatory system that are cotranscribed constitutively from the PUG promoter, whereas inducible transcription of the vanYG, vanWG, vanG, vanXYG, and vanTG resistance genes is initiated from the PYG promoter (Fig. 2) (63).
Phosphotransfer reactions catalyzed by VanRS and VanRBSB two-component systems. Despite the fact that the VanS/VanR and VanSB/VanRB two-component systems are only distantly related, they catalyze similar reactions. The two response regulators are 34% identical, whereas the histidine kinases possess only 23% sequence identity, with unrelated amino-terminal sensing domains (Fig. 2). VanS-type sensors comprise an N-terminal sensor domain with two membrane-spanning segments and a C-terminal cytoplasmic kinase domain (Fig. 1) (18, 269). Following a signal related to the presence of a glycopeptide in the culture medium, the cytoplasmic domain of VanS or VanSB catalyzes ATP-dependent autophosphorylation of a specific histidine residue at positions 164 and 233, respectively, and transfers the phosphate group to an aspartate residue at position 53 of VanR or VanRB present in the effector domain (Fig. 3) (13, 18, 269).
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Model
for positive (phosphorylation) and negative (dephosphorylation) control
of VanR by VanS and schematic representation of the synthesis of
peptidoglycan precursors in VanA- or VanB-type strains. Kinase
(A) and phosphatase (B) activities of VanS are
depicted. K, heterologous kinase; R, regulator; S, sensor. Dotted blue
circle, sensor domain; blue box, transmembrane domain; white circle,
kinase domain; horizontally striped green circle, receiver domain;
checkerboard green box, effector
domain.
|
In vitro binding of VanR and VanRB to promoter regulatory regions. There is sequence similarity between VanR and VanRB and response regulators of the OmpR/PhoB subclass in both the effector and DNA binding domains, with VanR being closer to OmpR (37% similarity) than to PhoB (35%), whereas VanRB is closer to PhoB (32% similarity) than to OmpR (26%). Phosphorylation of VanR and VanRB increases their DNA affinity, but VanR-P (112) appears to be more stable than VanRB-P (64). The promoters in the vanA and vanB operons have common features, with a single binding site in the PR and PRB promoters and two sites in the PH and PYB promoters (64, 112). However, the positionings of these sites in the promoter regions differ: in the case of VanR, the binding site is upstream from the 35 region (112), whereas it overlaps the 35 region for VanRB (Fig. 4) (64). The binding site is centered at 54.5 for VanR in PR and at 32.5 for VanRB in PRB. In the PH and PYB promoter regions, the sites are centered at 53.5 and 86.5 for VanR (112) and at 33.5 and 55.5 for VanRB (64), respectively. The two copies of the binding sites at PH and PYB are 33 bp (112) and 22 bp (64) apart, respectively, suggesting that since these figures differ almost exactly by three or two helical turns of B-DNA (10.5 bp/turn), they both lie on the same face of the DNA helix. VanR and VanRB bind with higher affinity to the corresponding PH and PYB promoters controlling the resistance genes than to the PR and PRB promoters for the regulatory genes (Fig. 4) (64). Phosphorylation increases the affinity for PH by 40-fold but increases the affinity for PYB by only 10-fold, indicating that the cooperativity is higher at PH than at PYB (Fig. 4) (64, 112). A direct relationship between the binding cooperativity of VanRB-P to its sites and the expression of the resistance genes may exist, since the levels of induction of the resistance genes are lower with VanRB than with VanR.
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A)
Schematic representation of the binding of VanR-type regulators to the
vanA and vanB promoters and (B) comparison
of affinity of VanR or VanRB and VanR-P or
VanRB-P for DNA fragments carrying the
PR/PRB and
PH/PYB promoters. Open arrows
represent coding sequences (red arrows, regulatory genes; purple
arrows, genes required for resistance; black arrows, genes of unknown
function).
|
A 21-bp consensus was identified within the binding regions of PRB and PYB, which consists of two and four direct repeats of the CTACAG(G/A)heptanucleotide, respectively (64). A similar organization has been observed in other response regulators such as CtsR (68) and PhoP (74, 270) from Bacillus subtilis and DcuR from Escherichia coli (3). The heptanucleotides, which correspond to the VanRB recognition sequence, are separated by four nucleotides, and at each site, the protected guanines are 10 bp apart and are thus positioned on the same face of the B-DNA helix (64). This tandem symmetry is consistent with the notion that VanRB binds to DNA as a head-to-tail dimer, as reported previously for PhoB (35). The consensus sequence of PRB and PYB is not present in the promoter regions of the other van operons. In contrast, sequence comparison of the PYG promoter, controlling the resistance genes in the vanG operon; the PYD promoter, controlling those of the vanD operon; and the PH promoter revealed a 12-bp consensus sequence, (T/C)CGTAXGAAA(T/A)T, similar to T(T/C)GTA(G/A)GAAA(T/A)T, corresponding to the regions protected by VanR and VanR-P in the vanA operon (112) that is present three times in the PYG region (63) and twice in the PYD region.
VanRB-P recruits the RNA polymerase to the regulatory and resistance gene promoters.
As mentioned above,
VanRB and VanRB-P bind specifically to
the same regions of the PRB and PYB promoters, and although not
essential for binding, phosphorylation of the regulator significantly
increases the affinity for the DNA targets
(64). Treatment with
acetylphosphate converts VanRB from a monomer with low
affinity for its binding site into a homodimer with higher DNA affinity
(64). Activation of gene
expression in vivo most likely requires the phosphorylation and
consequently the dimerization of VanRB to raise the binding
affinity to physiologically relevant levels. In order to switch on the
positive autoregulatory loop that leads to the expression of the
vancomycin resistance genes, a VanB-type strain needs to synthesize a
minimum number of VanRB and VanSB molecules even
in the absence of antibiotic. VanRB-P has a higher affinity
for its targets than VanRB and appears to be more
efficient than VanRB in promoting an open complex formation
with PRB and PYB
(64). The RNA polymerase
is able to interact with the PRB promoter region in
the absence or presence of VanRB but is able to interact
with PYB only in the presence of VanRB
and in both cases with an increased affinity when VanRB is
phosphorylated. In vitro transcription assays showed that
VanRB-P activates PYB more strongly than
PRB
(64). The higher affinity
of VanRB for PYB relative to
PRB may result from PYB having
two heptanucleotide direct repeats, possibly resulting in the
cooperative binding of the regulator to the two adjacent sites, which
may serve as recognition sites for VanRB and
VanRB-P binding. Although the regions protected by
VanRB and VanRB-P encompass the 35
regions of the promoters, VanRB-P is able to recruit the RNA
polymerase at the promoters and allows efficient open complex
formation. Unlike the situation with PhoB, the C-terminal domain of the
RNA polymerase
subunit is required for transcription
activation from the PRB and PYB
promoters, possibly by making direct contact with the activator or by
being mandatory for promoter binding
(64).
In vivo activation of the PR and PH promoters in VanA-type strains. In VanA-type strains, the activation of the PR and PH promoters has been studied using various transcriptional fusions with reporter genes (13, 14). Determinations of D,D-dipeptidase activity and of the cytoplasmic pool of peptidoglycan precursors show that the expression of glycopeptide resistance is regulated at the level of transcriptional initiation at these promoters. The PR and PH promoters have similar strengths and are regulated similarly. They are not activated in the absence of VanR and VanS, are induced by glycopeptides when VanR and VanS are present, and are constitutively activated by VanR in the absence of VanS due, presumably, to phosphorylation of VanR by host kinases (13, 14). Consequently, VanR is a transcriptional activator required for initiation at both promoters, whereas VanS is not necessary for the full activation of the promoters since VanR can be phosphorylated independently of its partner sensor. However, VanS is required for negative control of the promoters in the absence of glycopeptides, acting as a phosphatase under noninducing conditions, thus preventing the accumulation of VanR-P. VanR-P binds to the PR promoter and activates the transcription of the vanR and vanS genes. Regulation of the vanA gene cluster therefore involves not only a modulation of the relative amounts of VanR and VanR-P by the kinase and phosphatase activities of VanS but also a modulation of the concentration of the response regulator. An amplification loop results from the binding of VanR-P to the PR promoter with a resultant increased expression of vanR and accumulation of VanR-P following phosphorylation. This may explain the high-level transcription of the resistance genes observed in vanS null mutants, since the amplification loop, in combination with the long half-life of VanR-P, may compensate for the inefficient phosphorylation of the response regulator by the putative host kinase.
Acquisition of teicoplanin resistance by VanB-type enterococci. As mentioned above, enterococci harboring clusters of the vanB class remain susceptible to teicoplanin since this antibiotic is not an inducer (15). However, mutations in the vanSB sensor gene have been obtained in vitro (26) and in vivo in animal models (21) following selection by teicoplanin, which have resulted in three phenotypic classes (constitutive, teicoplanin-inducible, or heterogeneous expression of the resistance genes) due to three types of alterations of VanSB function. Mutations leading to teicoplanin resistance also confer low-level resistance to the glycopeptide oritavancine (LY333328) (16). Derivatives of VanB-type strains that are resistant to teicoplanin have been isolated from two patients following treatment with vancomycin (103) or teicoplanin (125), but the isolates were not studied further.
(i) Inducible phenotype. Substitutions in the sensor domain of VanSB lead to inducible expression of resistance by vancomycin and teicoplanin (Fig. 5) (26). A minority of the mutations are located between the two putative transmembrane segments of VanSB. This portion of the sensor is located at the outer surface of the membrane and may therefore interact directly with ligands, such as glycopeptides, which do not penetrate into the cytoplasm. The majority of the substitutions are located in the linker that connects the membrane-associated domain to the cytoplasmic catalytic domain. The N-terminal domain of VanSB is thus involved in signal recognition and is associated with alterations of specificity that allow induction by teicoplanin but not by the nonglycopeptide moenomycin, which also inhibits the transglycosylation reaction (13, 25).
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Schematic
representation of the VanSB sensor and location of amino
acid substitutions in teicoplanin-resistant mutants. H, N, G1, F, and
G2 refer to the motifs conserved in histidine protein kinases and are
shown as hatched boxes. The putative membrane-associated sensor domain
(dotted blue) containing transmembrane segments (blue) and the putative
cytoplasmic kinase domain (white) are indicated. Het, heterogeneously
resistant; R, resistant; S, sensitive; Te, teicoplanin; Vm,
vancomycin.
|
(ii) Constitutive phenotype. In the VanS-type sensors, five blocks (H, N, G1, F, and G2) of the kinase domain are highly conserved (Fig. 5). The H block is responsible for both autophosphorylation and kinase/phosphatase activities, and G1 and G2 correspond to ATP binding blocks. Mutations responsible for constitutive expression of the vanB cluster result from amino acid substitutions at two specific positions located on either side of the histidine at position 233, which is the putative autophosphorylation site in VanSB (Fig. 5) (26). Constitutive expression of glycopeptide resistance is most probably due to impaired dephosphorylation of VanRB by VanSB, as similar substitutions affecting homologous residues of related sensor kinases impair the phosphatase but not the kinase activity of the proteins (26, 65). These observations confirm that dephosphorylation of VanRB is required to prevent the transcription of the resistance genes (13).
A VanB-type Enterococcus faecium strain that was resistant to vancomycin and susceptible to teicoplanin was isolated from a patient, and 2 weeks later, a derivative that was constitutively resistant to high levels of both glycopeptides was isolated from the same patient (65). Increased resistance in the derivative was shown to be due to the combination of a frameshift mutation leading to the loss of the Ddl ligase activity and the constitutive synthesis of pentadepsipeptide precursors by the loss of VanSB phosphatase activity following a six-amino-acid deletion, which partially overlaps the conserved G2 ATP-binding domain (Fig. 5) (65).
(iii) Heterogeneous phenotype. The heterogeneously resistant derivatives most probably harbor null alleles of vanSB since the mutations introduce translation termination codons at various positions in the gene (Fig. 5) (27). The antibiotic disk diffusion assay revealed the presence of inhibition zones containing scattered colonies of resistant bacteria that grew predominantly in 48 h (21, 27).
The overproduction of PBP2 significantly increases resistance to teicoplanin, whereas the reduction in teicoplanin resistance is observed in vraSR null mutants, which agrees well with a loss of PBP2 induction (97). PBP2 possesses transglycosylase activity that catalyzes the elongation of the nascent peptidoglycan chains (195). However, elongation of the chains is not completely abolished after the inactivation of the transglycosylase domain of PBP2, indicating that other transglycosylases also catalyze the elongation reaction. The VraSR system positively regulates the sgtA and sgtB glycosyltransferase genes. The deduced proteins show significant similarity with transglycosylase domains and, consequently, may be involved in glycopeptide resistance in S. aureus (109). It is considered that increased transglycosylase activity contributes to resistance either by competing with glycopeptides for the capture of the membrane-bound murein monomers or by increasing the production of nascent peptidoglycan chains to provide more D-Ala-D-Ala that serves as a false target for vancomycin. High copy numbers of the vraSR genes do not increase the transcription of pbp2 and sgtB and require the presence of cell wall synthesis inhibitors to induce the expression of the genes (131). This indicates that the signal that activates the VraS sensor kinase could be generated by the inhibition of cell wall synthesis.
L-Ala-L-Ala-Lys3
peptidoglycan cross-bridge. Thus, the CroRS two-component regulatory
system is essential for ß-lactam resistance mediated by PBP5 in
enterococci. However, CroRS is not required for the production of
low-affinity PBP5, suggesting that it controls other,
as-yet-unidentified, factors essential for the activity of this
low-affinity penicillin binding protein. Recently, to gain a more comprehensive view of the role of two-component signal transduction pathways in the biology of E. faecalis, each of the 18 response regulators previously identified in E. faecalis V583 was targeted by insertion mutagenesis (99). An insertion in croR led to susceptibility to the cephalosporins, bacitracin, and vancomycin despite the presence of a functional vanB operon in strain V583. CroR is thus involved in resistance to a wide range of cell wall-active agents, indicating that this system may have a role in the regulation of cell wall synthesis.
The envelope of gram-negative bacteria comprises two membranes, the inner or cytoplasmic membrane and the outer membrane, which are separated by the periplasmic space, whereas gram-positive bacteria possess a single membrane. The membrane-located transporters can be grouped into the following five families based on sequence homology, mechanisms, and molecular characteristics: the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), the multidrug and toxin extrusion family, the resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, and the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family (Fig. 6). In gram-negative bacteria, the efflux machinery is complex, comprising a cytoplasmic membrane-located transporter, a periplasmic membrane adaptor protein, and an outer membrane channel protein. Genomes of gram-negative bacteria usually encode multiple members of each family of multidrug transporters (192). To date, only the ABC, MFS, and SMR families have been described in gram-positive organisms.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Schematic
representation of the cell membranes with examples of multidrug efflux
systems. ABC, ATP binding cassette; MFP, membrane fusion protein; MFS,
major facilitator superfamily; OM, outer membrane; OMF, outer membrane
factor; RND, resistance nodulation cell division; SMR, small multidrug
resistance.
|
Resistance to quinolones in Staphylococcus aureus. NorA was the first chromosomally encoded S. aureus pump to be identified. Based on its sequence, the cloned norA gene of a fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical strain was predicted to encode a typical MFS-type protein with 12 membrane-spanning alpha helices. NorA has the highest degree of identity with the Bmr MFS pump of Bacillus subtilis (44%) and only 20 to 25% identity with several tetracycline-specific efflux proteins of gram-negative bacteria (121). Cloning of norA in a plasmid in either S. aureus or E. coli results in fluoroquinolone resistance, particularly to hydrophilic molecules. NorA has a broad substrate specificity, including hydrophilic fluoroquinolones, biocides, and dyes. In addition, the substrates of NorA are typical of those of MDR pumps, namely, amphipathic cations. NorA activity is inhibited by reserpine, a compound known to act as an inhibitor of the function of many MDR efflux proteins. Resistance associated with NorA occurs only when the structural gene for this protein is either amplified or overexpressed as a result of regulatory mutations (121).
Regulation of NorA expression depends on at least two systems, ArlRS and MgrA (formerly NorR) (83, 84, 255). MgrA is composed of 147 residues, has modest similarity with other regulatory proteins such as MarR in E. coli and SarR in S. aureus, and, when overexpressed, causes increased expression of norA. It binds upstream from the norA promoter, and experimental data suggest that repeats of the TTAATT consensus sequence may be involved in the binding of this protein (255). Four such hexamers are located upstream from the 35 motif of the norA promoter. MgrA is not a specific regulator of norA expression but, rather, is a global regulator, since it also regulates autolytic activity and the expression of several virulence factors, including alpha toxin, nuclease, and protein A (153). MgrA is transcribed from two promoters, positively regulates its own expression, and acts at the transcriptional level to enhance the expression of numerous genes. Recently, two novel efflux transporters, NorB and Tet38, that confer resistance to multiple drugs including quinolones and tetracycline, respectively, have been shown to be negatively regulated by MgrA (254).
The ArlR-ArlS two-component regulatory system is involved in adhesion, autolysis, and extracellular proteolytic activity of S. aureus (85). The binding of MgrA to the norA promoter is modified in a strain with a disrupted arlS such that increased norA expression is observed (83, 84, 255). Overexpression of mgrA in a strain producing the ArlS sensor results in increased transcription of norA and reduced susceptibility to various NorA substrates. These data suggest that a mutation in arlS increases the effect of MgrA on the norA promoter and that wild-type levels of MgrA have little effect on norA expression. Highly fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of S. aureus in which norA expression is enhanced in the absence of any modification in arlR-arlS or change in mgrA expression have been reported, indicating that other loci must be involved in the regulation of norA expression.
Resistance to multiple drugs in gram-negative bacteria. The synthesis of the tripartite efflux systems of gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 6) depends on regulatory genes, implying individual control and thus distinct functions in the cell (180). Two-component systems are not commonly involved in the regulation of drug efflux transporters, although such systems have recently been associated with RND-type pumps, such as AdeABC in Acinetobacter baumannii (154), SmeABC in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (145), and MdtABC in E. coli (28).
Intrinsic resistance of gram-negative bacteria is due to multidrug efflux by RND pumps that are widely distributed and act in synergy with the outer membrane barrier. The wide substrate range of these transporters often includes ß-lactams and aminoglycosides, which are rarely subjected to efflux by other pump classes. RND transporters form a multiprotein complex with members of the outer membrane factor family and of the periplasmic linker membrane fusion protein family. These complexes allow the excretion of drugs directly into the medium. Chromosomally encoded multidrug RND efflux systems appear to be most important for resistance to antimicrobials in P. aeruginosa and other gram-negative pathogens.
(i) Acinetobacter baumannii. A. baumannii is one of the predominant bacteria associated with outbreaks of nosocomial infections that are often very difficult to treat because of the frequent resistance of this species to multiple antibiotics. Aminoglycosides can be used successfully in combination with a ß-lactam, and combinations of a ß-lactam with either a fluoroquinolone or rifampin have also been proposed. Partial resistance of A. baumannii to ß-lactams is due to the synthesis of a species-specific cephalosporinase (258).
The chromosomally encoded three-component AdeABC pump in A. baumannii is composed of the membrane fusion homolog AdeA, the RND superfamily member AdeB with 12 transmembrane segments, and AdeC an outer membrane protein similar to OprM of P. aeruginosa (154). Insertional inactivation of adeB indicates that the corresponding protein is responsible for resistance not only to aminoglycosides but also to fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, and trimethoprim. Thus, this efflux pump recognizes a wide spectrum of substrates including hydrophobic, amphiphilic, and hydrophilic molecules, which can be either positively charged or neutral. When the adeC gene is inactivated, resistance to the various substrates of the AdeABC pump is unaltered (161), suggesting that AdeAB can utilize another outer membrane constituent, as already observed for MexXY from P. aeruginosa (see below).
The
expression of multidrug transporters is commonly controlled by specific
regulatory proteins. Their structural genes are most often adjacent to
those encoding the efflux system. The adeABC genes are
cotranscribed and adjacent to the adeS and adeR genes
that are transcribed in the opposite direction and encode a sensor and
a regulator, respectively (Fig.
7) (161). Inactivation of
adeS leads to aminoglycoside susceptibility, indicating that
this gene is required for the expression of the adeABC operon.
Spontaneous aminoglycoside-resistant derivatives that have mutations in
the AdeS sensor or in the AdeR regulator can be obtained in vitro. The
T153M substitution in AdeS, downstream from histidine 149,
the putative site of autophosphorylation, is presumably responsible for
the loss of phosphatase activity of the sensor, as observed for EnvZ
(T247R), PhoR (T220N), and VanSB
(T237K). In AdeR, the P116L mutation
at the first residue of the
5 helix of the receiver domain is
involved in interactions that control the output domain of response
regulators. These mutations result in the constitutive expression of
the AdeABC pump, which is otherwise cryptic in wild-type A.
baumannii due to stringent control by
AdeRS.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Genetic
organization of the adeRS-adeABC operon from A.
baumannii, the smeRS-smeABC operon from S.
maltophilia, and the mexR-mexAB-oprM,
mexT-mexEF-oprN, nfxB-mexCD-oprJ, and
mexZ-mexXY MDR operons from P. aeruginosa. Purple
arrows, structural genes for drug efflux complexes; red arrows,
regulatory genes that either repress () or activate
(+) gene expression (this still has to be confirmed for
mexZ).
|
The SmeABC multidrug efflux system, a homolog of the mexAB-oprM efflux operon of P. aeruginosa (see below), is regulated by the SmeSR two-component system (Fig. 7) (145). A strain in which the smeABC genes are overexpressed displays resistance to aminoglycosides, ß-lactams, and the fluoroquinolones. Deletions in smeC but not in smeB decrease resistance, suggesting that SmeC only, which possesses its own promoter, contributes to multidrug resistance. Thus, SmeABC does not function as a multidrug efflux system, but it rather appears that SmeC plays a role in antimicrobial resistance independently of SmeAB, possibly as the outer membrane factor component of another unidentified multidrug efflux system (145).
As has been observed for the AdeABC system of A. baumannii, two genes, smeR and smeS, upstream from the smeABC operon and transcribed in the opposite direction, encode a regulatory system composed of a sensor (SmeS) and a regulator (SmeR) (Fig. 7) (145). SmeR positively regulates both smeABC and its own smeSR operon.
(iii) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa is a ubiquitous aerobic gram-negative opportunistic pathogen and one of the most common causes of nosocomial infections. Treatment of P. aeruginosa infections is complicated by the intrinsic resistance of this organism to many antimicrobial agents, which results from the synergistic activity of the outer membrane barrier with that of various broad-substrate-range multidrug efflux systems. In addition to intrinsic resistance, multidrug efflux (Mex) systems promote acquired resistance by overexpression of the structural genes for the pumps following mutational events.
Six RND efflux systems in P. aeruginosa have been characterized (Table 1) (4, 5, 50, 111, 129, 206, 207). The efflux operons each encode an inner membrane RND transporter (MexB, MexD, MexF, MexX, MexK, or MexI), a periplasmic membrane fusion protein (MexA, MexC, MexE, MexY, MexJ, or MexH), and, in certain cases, an outer membrane channel protein (OprM, OprJ, OprN, or OpmD). All these RND operons are similar in their genetic organizations but not with respect to regulation, and the corresponding pumps differ in their substrate specificities (Fig. 7 and Table 1). The antibiotic substrate spectrums of these systems are very wide (Table 1). MexAB-OprM, which exhibits an extraordinarily broad substrate range, is constitutively produced in wild-type bacteria and plays a major role in the intrinsic resistance of P. aeruginosa (Table 1) (128). The MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, and MexJK-OprM systems are not expressed in wild-type P. aeruginosa (50, 129, 206). Expression of many RND multidrug pumps is controlled by local regulators (Table 1), mostly repressors (Fig. 7). With the exception of MexAB-OprM, the expression of most of these efflux systems is tightly regulated.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Substrate
profiles and regulatory components of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
efflux pumps
|
(iv) Escherichia coli. Certain multidrug efflux pumps in E. coli are regulated by two-component systems. BaeSR is involved in the expression of the RND transporter MdtABCD that pumps out novobiocin and deoxycholate (28, 178). The baeS and baeR genes are immediately downstream from the mdtABCD genes and together probably form an operon.
BaeR and BaeS exhibit in vitro phosphotransfer in the presence of ATP (28), but the nature of the stimulus recognized by the BaeS sensor is not known. The BaeR response regulator binds to the mdtA promoter, and its overexpression strongly stimulates the transcription of the mdtABCD gene cluster, leading to an increase in resistance to novobiocin and deoxycholate. The presence of the BaeS sensor kinase is not required for the full activity of overexpressed BaeR in intact cells. BaeR could be phosphorylated by other sensor kinases present in E. coli, since such cross talk occurs particularly when one of the noncognate partners is present in excess. Cross-regulation has been observed between the various two-component regulatory systems, BaeSR, PhoBR, which is implicated in phosphate metabolism, and CreBC, which is implicated in carbon and energy metabolism (181).
Many of the two-component signal transduction systems in E. coli control the expression of multiple target genes. BaeR modulates the expression of mdtABCD but also that of acrD, which encodes a multidrug exporter system conferring resistance to ß-lactams and novobiocin (108).
|
|
|---|
IS elements may be present in one or several copies and localized on the chromosome, on plasmids, or on both and must reside on conjugative elements for intercellular transfer. Many transpose readily, and others, such as IS200, transpose rarely (32). There is great variability in the distribution of the IS elements of the different families among bacterial species, with some of them restricted to few hosts, such as IS6110, which has been found only in mycobacteria of the tuberculosis complex (156, 250).
IS elements are typically bounded by short repeat sequences of up to ca. 40 bp in an indirect orientation. These inverted repeats are specific for each element, and their presence and integrity are required for transposition, which may or may not be site specific. Upon insertion into the target DNA, a repeat sequence, 2 to 14 bp in length and characteristic for each element, is generated in a direct orientation (Fig. 8). Many elements carry a single, transposase-encoding open reading frame (ORF) covering most of the element, while others carry several ORFs, on a single strand or on both strands, the products of which may also play a role in the regulation of the transposition process. Of particular interest in the present context, IS elements may contain partial or complete promoters, often located at their extremities and in an outward orientation and capable of activating the expression of neighboring genes (Fig. 8) (46, 155).
|
View larger version (4K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Characteristics
of IS elements. DR, direct repeat; IR, inverted repeat;
35/10 and 35, approximate locations of
promoter consensus
sequences.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. IS elements affecting genes conferring or modulating resistance to antibiotics
|
(i) Activation of resistance genes by promoter alterations. The molecular mechanisms responsible for altered, IS-mediated expression are not specific for resistance genes. Transcriptional activation may result from IS insertion into a region carrying a weak, an incomplete, or no promoter. Therefore, a hybrid promoter with an alternative or new IS-borne 35 region may be generated, or a complete IS-borne promoter containing both the 35 and the 10 regions may be acquired (Fig. 8). With few exceptions (see below), these two regions conform to the canonical consensus sequences TTGACA and TATAAT, respectively, with a spacing distance of 17 bp for optimal promoter activity as determined for E. coli (149).
(a) Resistance gene activation by IS-mediated formation of hybrid promoters. An IS-mediated rearrangement of the promoter region of the ampC gene of E. coli was shown in an experimental setup (118) only shortly before the observation of similar events affecting resistance genes in clinical isolates. It was found that the insertion of IS2, of which E. coli carries five chromosomal copies, into the 10 region of the artificially plasmid-borne ampC gene resulted in concomitant, ca. 20-fold increases in ampC transcription, ß-lactamase production, and ampicillin resistance levels. While the 10 region remained unaltered and the 35 region was changed to a sequence with less homology with the consensus sequence than that of the natural ampC promoter, the critical event was concluded to be the change of the spacer region from 16 to 17 bp. Despite the efficiency of this rearrangement in increasing the resistance level and although IS2 belongs to the family that is most widely distributed among bacterial species (156), this element does not seem to have been involved similarly in clinical isolates. Another IS2 insertion, with the creation of a putative hybrid promoter upstream from the efflux pump-encoding acrEF gene and its increased expression in an E. coli laboratory mutant, facilitated the determination of the substrate profile of the pump (119). Probably the first observation of an IS-mediated formation of a hybrid promoter for an antibiotic resistance gene in a clinical isolate was made by Bräu et al. (39) in Salmonella. They found the plasmid-borne aac(3)-IV and aph(4) genes, coding for gentamicin and hygromycin B resistance, respectively, in an operon-like arrangement downstream from IS140 (IS26), which provided the 35 region.
IS-mediated rearrangements of promoters driving the transcription of genes encoding extended-spectrum ß-lactamases belonging to several families of the class A or class D enzymes (117) have been observed (Table 2). The IS26 element has been reported to contribute to the formation of a hybrid promoter for a chromosome-borne SHV-2A gene in P. aeruginosa and for a similar, plasmid-borne gene in a resistance operon (downstream from an aminoglycoside 3'-O-phosphotransferase gene) in Klebsiella pneumoniae, with the new 35 region in each case at the optimal distance of 17 bp from the respective resistance gene-specific 10 region (137, 177). The gene of TEM-6, as identified in a ceftazidime-resistant strain of E. coli, acquired a 35 region after the insertion of an IS1-like element into the spacer region of its "natural" promoter, P3, the strength of which was increased by a factor of 10 (89). It was speculated that this element, which was found to be widespread among ß-lactamase-producing and non-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, had been derived from IS1 through a substantial deletion of its central region as well as by point mutations in the remainder, which did not affect the 35 region. In a laboratory mutant, the replacement of the 35 region of the same P3 promoter of the TEM-1 gene carried on plasmid pBR322 by a similar IS1-borne region had previously been shown to result in decreased promoter strength, which was considered to be related to a lesser degree of homology between this region and the 35 consensus sequence (209).
In Acinetobacter species 13, aminoglycosideresistance is conferred by the species-specific 6'-N-acetyltransferase-encoding gene, aac(6')-Ij, which may be expressed at various levels (133). The activation of silent copies of the aac(6')-Ij gene in this species by the creation of a putative hybrid promoter with an IS18-borne 35 region appears to occur at a low frequency, at least as judged from the in vitro selection of tobramycin-resistant mutants of a susceptible clinical isolate (229).
The IS256 and IS257 elements have a proven role in the activation of resistance gene transcription in staphylococci. IS256 belongs to a large family with members in gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (http://www-IS.biotoul.fr). It flanks the composite aminoglycoside resistance transposon Tn4001 and related elements and is involved in their dissemination in staphylococci, enterococci, and streptococci (158). IS256 is infrequently observed in the animal commensal species Staphylococcus sciuri, in which two-thirds of the isolates are susceptible to ß-lactam antibiotics including methicillin, although they carry a close homolog of the mecA gene, the primary drug resistance determinant in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (58). Analysis of a heterogeneously methicillin-resistant human clinical isolate of S. sciuri (with MICs of methicillin of between 25 and 800 µg/ml as opposed to between 3 and 6 µg/ml for a mecA-positive, IS256-negative control strain) revealed the insertion of an IS256 copy into the upstream region of mecA with the creation of a powerful hybrid promoter. This led to the speculation that the S. sciuri isolate had acquired IS256 in a clinical environment where the activation of mecA had then been selected under drug pressure (59). In that same study, mecA activation in S. sciuri was obtained in vitro, and the 35 region of the hybrid promoter was the same as that previously identified as being responsible for the transcriptional activation of llm, a gene of S. aureus encoding a putatively membrane-associated protein that contributes to methicillin heteroresistance in this species in an as-yet-unknown manner (159).
A variation
on the theme of hybrid promoter formation has been found in S.
aureus in connection with the IS257-dependent effects on
the levels of trimethoprim resistance resulting from the association of
a constant, IS-borne 35 region with variable 10
regions upstream from the resistance gene. Trimethoprim resistance in
S. aureus occurs at low or high levels (with MICs of 50 to 300
µg/ml or
1,000 µg/ml, respectively) and is
mediated by the dihydrofolate reductase gene dfrA, which
resides in the center of a three-gene operon carried by Tn4003
(or Tn4003-like elements), a composite transposon flanked by
three copies of IS257
(138,
225). The promoter of
this operon overlaps the right end of the left copy of the element
IS257L, with its 10 sequence located in the central
region of the transposon and the 35 sequence in the right
terminus of IS257L. Low-level resistance was found to be
associated with various deletions that extend ca. 10 to 300 bp away
from the right end of IS257L and unmask alternative
10 regions differing in sequence or distance to the
35 box, or both, from the corresponding region in the
high-level resistance-conferring form of the transposon. Such deletion
variants exist in S. aureus as well as in coagulase-negative
staphylococci. It is believed that IS257 itself is involved in
the generation of the flanking deletions and that the transposon
variants that carry them may have established themselves by imposing
less strain on the fitness of their hosts while conferring levels of
resistance that are still advantageous
(138). IS257
has also been found to affect the level of tetA(K)-dependent
efflux-mediated tetracycline resistance in S. aureus
(237). Analysis of an
IS257-flanked cointegrated copy of a
tetA(K)-carrying, pT181-like plasmid in the mec
region of a methicillin-resistant strain of S. aureus revealed
the replacement of the 35 region of tetA(K), in the
nonintegrated form of the plasmid, by the more efficient IS-borne
counterpart (the same as in IS257L of Tn4003); in
addition, the existence of a complete promoter was detected in the
right extremity of IS257, which was, however, less powerful
than the hybrid promoter. The combined strength of the complete and the
hybrid promoter in the cointegrate, compared to that of the single
promoter in the autonomous plasmid, was determined to lead to
substantially higher levels of tetracycline resistance as well as
relative fitness in the presence of tetracycline at low concentrations
(237). Apart from
affecting the levels of resistance to trimethoprim and tetracycline, as
well as methicillin (see below), IS257 has been found to be
associated with genes conferring resistance to antibiotics of five
additional classes and is suspected to provide hybrid promoters for the
aminoglycoside and mupirocin resistance genes aadA and
mupA, respectively. In light of the involvement of
IS257 in the capture and expression of resistance genes in
staphylococci, its impact on the assembly of multiresistance gene
clusters has been likened to that of the integrons in gram-negative
bacteria
(81).
(b) Resistance gene activation by IS-mediated formation of complete promoters. Many IS elements provide complete promoters for resistance genes (Table 2). The contribution of such a promoter by ISEcp1 to the expression of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum ß-lactamase genes has been reported in several instances. The suggested promoter for blaCTX-M-15 on the right end of ISEcp1 (122) as well as the suggested mode of ISEcp1-supported gene mobilization by one-ended transposition (241a) have been validated experimentally for blaCTX-M-17 (41) and for blaCTX-M-19 (201, 203). Considering that ISEcp1 or ISEcp1-like elements are present upstream from genes of multiple other CTX-M- and also CMY-type enzymes in various species of Enterobacteriaceae (see references 36, 73, 150, and 203 and references therein), this element may be among those most largely involved in the expression of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase genes.
A complete promoter on the left end of IS1999 was suggested to drive the transcription of oxa-48 in an isolate of K. pneumoniae in which the corresponding extended-spectrum class D enzyme, OXA-48, contributed to carbapenem resistance (202). Also, in P. aeruginosa, this same promoter was present upstream of the experimentally determined site of the initiation of transcription of blaVEB-1 (22). In this case, IS1999 (which was found to coexist with blaVEB-1 frequently in P. aeruginosa but rarely in Enterobacteriaceae) and the adjacent ß-lactamase gene were located inside a chromosome-borne integron. The IS-borne promoter, which matches the 35 consensus sequence only poorly (at one out of six positions), was shown to slightly increase the efficiency of the integron-specific promoter Pc (see below) by a factor of 1.6. There was no such increase when a second element, IS2000, was inserted between IS1999 and blaVEB-1, an arrangement observed in some ceftazidime-resistant, VEB-1-producing clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (22).
Two distinct promoters, one complete and one almost complete and with different spacing, have been found on the left end of ISPa12 upstream from the transcriptional start sites of the extended-spectrum ß-lactamase gene blaPER-1 in strains of P. aeruginosa and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, respectively. In the case of the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain, the 10 region overlapped the left inverted repeat and the direct repeat of the element (200). This observation would suggest that, depending upon the nucleotide sequence at the site of its insertion, ISPa12 may have the capacity to promote the expression of resistance genes with variable efficiencies.
The expression of the AmpC gene in Acinetobacter baumannii has been found to vary with the absence or presence of ISAba1, or closely related elements, immediately upstream from the gene (57, 234). An outward-directed promoter was identified after mapping of the transcription initiation site (234), and its strength was determined to be approximately 10-fold greater than that found in the absence of the IS element (105). The ISAba1-borne promoter notably accounted for high-level resistance to ceftazidime (57, 105).
In the
gram-negative anaerobe Bacteroides fragilis, the
species-specific, endogenous cephalosporinase gene cepA is
present in over 90% of the members of the species but is expressed at
either low or high levels, with ca. 15- to 100-fold differences in the
MICs of ampicillin for the two categories
(197,
222). These differences
have largely been explained by increased levels of cepA
transcription in the highly resistant strains due to a modified
promoter structure resulting from the insertion, ca. 50 nucleotides
upstream from the translational start codon, of IS1224, an
IS21-like element
(222). In
Bacteroides, the consensus sequences of the two promoter
regions (33, TTTG; 7,
TANNTTTG) do not conform to those of the
corresponding 35 and 10 regions recognized by typical
70 factors and do not appear to require as strict a
spacing (29), a situation
in keeping with the existence of a particular primary sigma factor in
the Bacteroidetes phylum
(259). In all high-level
but not in the low-level ampicillin-resistant B. fragilis
strains analyzed, a TTTG sequence was present at the
cepA-proximal extremity of a remnant of the IS21-like
element and observed with appropriate spacing with respect to the
TAccTTTG (c, nonconsensus nucleotide) region,
thus contributing to the formation of a hybrid promoter
(222). With the
exception of cepA and the tet genes, most other
resistance genes in B. fragilis are efficiently expressed when
transcription is driven by complete, IS-borne promoters. This is the
case for cfiA, the nim genes, and ermF/S,
conferring resistance to the ß-lactam antibiotics
including the carbapenems, the nitroimidazoles, and the
macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins B (MLSB),
respectively. The activation of a silent cfiA gene by the
Bacteroides-type promoter of IS1186 was first
demonstrated in vitro
(198) and was also later
reported to occur similarly (with an
IS942/IS1170-related element) in vivo during imipenem
therapy (75). In
virtually all B. fragilis strains with MICs of imipenem of
16 µg/ml, IS insertions of great diversity have been
found in a region of less than 100 bp upstream from cfiA
involving over a dozen elements, or isoforms thereof, belonging to at
least four families (Table
2)
(http://www-IS.biotoul.fr).
Curiously, these elements may also carry, next to the
Bacteroides-type promoter regions, typical 10,
35 sequences
(199), which, in the
case of IS942 and IS1187, have been shown to drive
reporter gene expression in E. coli (D. Vingadassalom,
unpublished data). A similar array of IS elements has been found
upstream from the nim genes, and, by analogy but without
experimental verification, it is assumed that they also contribute to
their expression. IS4351 (which may also activate
cfiA) provides the promoter for ermF/S carried by the
composite transposon Tn4351, but not all strains with
ermF/S-mediated macrolide resistance harbor this IS element
(197,
213).
(ii) Disruption of resistance-modulating genes. There is a variety of examples of insertional inactivation by IS elements of genes encoding proteins that modulate, in one way or another, the efficiency of a given resistance mechanism. These proteins include negative regulators of resistance genes in the strict sense or of multidrug efflux pump genes mediating nonspecific resistance. Other resistance-modulating proteins that may be affected are porins, which condition antibiotic influx across the outer membrane in gram-negative bacteria, or rare proteins without a clearly established function.
In gram-negative bacteria, inducible ß-lactam resistance due to the production of the cephalosporinase AmpC is controlled by a complex regulatory circuit involving (next to the transcriptional regulator AmpR and the permease AmpG) AmpD, an amidase affecting the intracellular levels of the muropeptide that conditions the regulatory status of AmpR (116). It had been shown previously that impaired AmpD function leads to the derepression of ampC expression. High semiconstitutive ampC expression resulted from the spontaneous insertion of IS1 into ampD of a strain of E. coli into which the ampR and ampC genes from Citrobacter freundii had been introduced (148). A comparable insertion event occurred in ceftazidime-resistant clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa with stably derepressed AmpC production in which IS1669 had disrupted the AmpD gene (24).
Expression of the mecA gene, encoding the low-affinity PBP2a responsible for methicillin resistance in staphylococci, may be connected to the presence of a regulator region upstream that contains mecR1 and mecI, the divergently transcribed genes of a sensor-transducer and a mecA repressor, respectively (171). IS-mediated rearrangements of the regulator region involving IS1272 or IS431 have resulted in the deletion of mecI and various sections of mecR1. As shown in spontaneous mutants selected in the laboratory, these rearrangements may lead to heterogeneous methicillin resistance (123). The particular deletion configurations characterize three of the five classes of the so-called mecA gene complex, which occur with different frequencies in S. aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci (123, 126).
In P. aeruginosa, expression of the three-component efflux pumps of the RND family is negatively controlled. Repressor gene disruption leads to resistance phenotypes that depend on the substrate specificity of the corresponding pump. Disruption by IS21 of mexR, which controls the expression of the mexAB-oprM operon (241), was found in a clinical ticarcillin- and aztreonam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate in which eight- and fourfold-higher MICs of the respective drugs were associated with a threefold-higher level of mexA transcripts in comparison with a control strain containing intact mexR (37). The mexCD-oprJ operon, controlled by nfxB, does not appear to be substantially expressed under normal growth conditions. Its expression was triggered, in a mexB/mexXY-deficient mutant subjected to growth in the presence of tigecycline, by the disruption of nfxB by an unnamed IS element of P. aeruginosa, demonstrating the capability of MexCD-OprJ to pump out the minocycline analog and to afford, in this particular genetic background, a 16- to 32-fold increase in the MIC of the compound (61).
Expression of the multidrug efflux pump AcrAB in E. coli is negatively regulated by acrR and is also controlled by the marRAB locus (184). A discrete, ca. 1.5-fold increase in acrB transcription was accompanied by a similar increase in the MICs of fluoroquinolones and ß-lactams in a mar deletion mutant in which an insertion of IS186 into acrR had occurred after exposure to ofloxacin (119).
Bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics, notably to ß-lactams, can be altered directly by gene disruption when IS elements insert into the structural genes of porins. This was first shown in K. pneumoniae isolates with a disrupted ompK36, the OmpC gene homolog of the species (106). The IS1, IS5, IS26, or IS903 element was found, in nine randomly in vitro-selected cefoxitin-resistant derivatives, at various positions within the plasmid-borne porin gene that had been introduced into an OmpK36-deficient host, while in a collection of cefoxitin-resistant clinical isolates (some of them from patients undergoing therapy), ompK36 was inactivated by an IS5-like element in three isolates and by IS102 in one isolate (107). A similar gene disruption caused by IS26 in a CTX-M-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolate led to carbapenem resistance (172). Porin gene inactivations were previously described as being responsible for carbapenem resistance in clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. In P. aeruginosa, carbapenem diffusion through the outer membrane is facilitated by OprD2 (252). In several multiple-drug-resistant isolates of this species, with MICs of imipenem of 16 to 32 µg/ml, the corresponding gene was disrupted at various sites by ISPa1328 or ISPa1635, leading to the absence of OprD production and also to the down-regulation of oprD transcription (268). In A. baumannii, carbapenem resistance may be associated with the loss of an outer membrane protein termed CarO, which has been suggested to be a functional analog of OprD (147, 175). Among a collection of CarO-deficient isolates, the corresponding gene was found to be disrupted in two isolates by ISAba825 or ISAba125, giving credence to the suggested role of CarO in the diffusion of carbapenems (175).
In strains of Enterococcus faecium and S. aureus, IS elements have been shown to influence glycopeptide resistance. In enterococci, acquired resistance of the VanA, VanB, and VanD type depends on the production of peptidoglycan precursors with a D-Ala-D-Lac instead of the D-Ala-D-Ala terminus, which forms a complex with the glycopeptides in susceptible strains (194). While VanA- and VanB-type resistance is inducible, critically requiring the chromosome-encoded ligase Ddl (for D-Ala-D-Ala synthesis) and the resistance operon-encoded regulatory proteins VanR and VanS, VanD-type resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in E. faecium is constitutively expressed. In strains with this resistance phenotype, both ddl and vanS have been found to be mutationally altered, entailing the absence of all D-Ala-D-Ala incorporation into the membrane-associated peptidoglycan precursor along with sustained activation of the resistance genes (vanHDDXD) by VanR, which is only slowly dephosphorylated in the absence of VanS. Either gene has been found to be disrupted by an insertion element: ddl by IS19, also called ISEfm1 (38, 193), and vanSD by ISEfa4 (67).
In intermediately glycopeptide-resistant strains of S. aureus, resistance is not specified by a defined set of acquired genes but, rather, is due to the accumulation of mutations in an array of genes controlling mainly cell wall metabolism and composition (33). One of these genes, tcaA, encodes a putative transmembrane protein that might act as a sensor or a signal transducer. Although up-regulated in the presence of teicoplanin, it is the absence of the gene that causes a decrease in glycopeptide susceptibility. Disruption of tcaA by IS256, accompanied by increased glycopeptide resistance, was found in a spontaneous derivative of a glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus isolate (157).
IS-mediated gene disruption leading to pyrazinamide resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been reported in one case. In this species, the susceptibility to pyrazinamide is linked to the production of the pncA-encoded enzyme pyrazinamidase, which transforms the drug into a bactericidal derivative (104). Analysis of 19 pyrazinamide-resistant isolates revealed that the absence of pyrazinamide activity in one of them was due to the insertion of IS6110 into pncA and that this insertion had occurred into the preferential 10-bp target site of the element that is present in the gene (139).
To a large extent, the instances of IS effects on resistance gene expression and on resistance levels reviewed here represent observations of individual cases. Few molecular epidemiological studies seem to have been attempted to determine the frequencies at which the identified elements are involved in the resistance process and to quantify their true impact in the clinical setting [which potentially also includes the abolition of resistance, as observed in an aminoglycoside-susceptible strain of Acinetobacter haemolyticus with its species-specific aac(6')-Ig gene disrupted by IS17 (228) or as suspected in a strain of K. pneumoniae, with its integron cassette-borne cmlA and oxa-10 genes disrupted by two putative IS elements (257)]. Considering the multiplicity of IS elements and the diversity of resistance-related targets into which they have been found to insert spontaneously, under natural or experimental conditions, a larger involvement than is obvious from the individual descriptions would not be surprising, nor would the future description of known or novel elements as being capable of rendering existing mechanisms of resistance more efficient.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Transcriptional
control in class 1 integrons. (A) Schematic representation of
the integron platform. 5' CS and 3' CS, 5'- and
3'-conserved segments, respectively; Pc and P2, promoter
regions (see the text); attI1, recombination site; C1 and C2,
gene cassettes; 59 be, 59-base-pair elements with possible stem-loop
structures. (B) Relative strength of integron-borne promoter
variants. aDetermined relative to the strength of the
tac promoter, set at 1 (data are from reference
141).
bStreptomycin concentration at which 50% of cells plated
formed colonies (data are from reference
54). (C)
Effects of cassette order on resistance levels. aResistance
is conferred to streptomycin (Sm) by aadA2, to gentamicin (Gm)
by aacC1, and to kanamycin (Km) by aacA4 (the genes
for which a position effect is observed and the corresponding
antibiotic concentrations at which 50% of cells plated formed colonies
[IC50s] are shown in boldface type).
bIC50 data are from reference
54.
|
Transcriptional control of resistance gene expression in class 1 integrons. Transcription of cassette-associated resistance genes is controlled twofold. While the transcription of probably all promoterless genes in a cassette array is driven by the Pc promoter, four variants of which exist, the expression of genes in the second position and further downstream is additionally conditioned by putative 59-be-encoded transcription terminators with probably low efficiency (Fig. 9A) (54).
(i) Impact of the integron-borne promoter region. The strengths of three variants of Pc (which was initially called P1 or Pant) and of a secondary promoter, P2, located 252 to 223 bp and 133 to 107 bp, respectively, from the recombination point, have been measured relative to the strength of the tac promoter or as reflected in antibiotic resistance levels (54, 141). The three variants of Pc, with the sequences TTGACA/TAAACT, TGGACA/TAAGCT, or TGGACA/TAAACT in their 35/10 regions (separated by a 17-bp spacer), were categorized as "strong," "weak," or "hybrid," respectively, and vary in strength by a factor of approximately 30 (141). The weak form may be associated with the secondary promoter, P2 (TTGTTA/TAAGCT), which is active when carrying a 3-bp insertion in its otherwise 14-bp spacer. When the transcription of aadA2 (or aadA1) was driven by the strong or the weak form of Pc, or by the combination of Pc[weak] and P2, there was good agreement between the relative promoter strengths and the resistance levels (Fig. 9B). Primer extension mapping of the transcription start sites revealed that when the combination of Pc[weak] and P2 is functional, the majority of the transcripts originates at P2, confirming the finding that, in this configuration, P2 contributes 90% of the total promoter activity (54, 141). The combination of Pc[strong] and P2 promoters has been observed recently, but its strength has not been determined (208).
When a BLAST search was carried out for the class 1 integron sequences that cover the distance between the 35 region of Pc and the inner boundary of the 5'-conserved segment and that are identical with the nucleotide sequences specifying any one of the four promoter variants Pc[strong], Pc[weak], Pc[hybrid], and Pc[weak] plus P2, it appears that among more than 100 retrieved sequences, there are quite similar numbers of each variant. Although this information cannot be taken as true molecular epidemiological data, it would suggest that neither promoter variant may be of singular advantage for resistance gene expression. The same search failed to reveal clearly preferential associations between any of the promoter variants and individual cassette-associated genes inserted at attI1, although there may be a tendency for carbapenemase genes of the blaIMP type to occur more frequently downstream from Pc[strong] or Pc[weak] and of the blaVIM type to occur more frequently downstream from Pc[hybrid].
(ii) Impact of the cassette-borne 59-be. The expression of promoterless, cassette-associated resistance genes is markedly influenced by their position in a cassette array. Using a series of plasmid constructs in which the transcription of the cassette genes is driven from the same promoter (in this case, Pc[strong]), and as exemplified in Fig. 9C, Collis and Hall showed that the resistance level conferred by a given gene is highest when it is promoter proximal and that this level is reduced, by factors of generally between 2 and 5, when a cassette is present upstream (54). It was suggested that this modulation of resistance gene expression occurs essentially at the level of transcription and that it is linked to properties of the 59-be-containing 3' ends of the cassettes, since these ends were found to coincide roughly with the 3' ends of the major mRNA transcripts of the cassettes. The possibility was put forward that the 59-base elements, which generally contain inverted repeats, function as transcription terminators (54). Substantial silencing of a downstream gene, as of aac(6')-Ib downstream from blaIMP-1, may be observed when there is the potential for the formation of a stable stem-loop structure, although in this case, silencing might alternatively, or in addition, be due to poor translation if one considers the presence of a ribosomal binding site of only three nucleotides (8). Full silencing has also been reported, as for oxa-9 downstream from the cmlA-2 cassette in In40 (196).
(iii) Transcription independent of integron-specific sequences. The expression of some cassette-associated resistance genes is driven by promoters other than Pc. This was first shown for the cmlA cassette of In4, specifying nonenzymatic chloramphenicol resistance, which contains a cluster of three overlapping promoter sequences (34), and later also for several cmlA cassette variants (176, 196, 204). (The control of cmlA expression at the translational level is described below in the section on translational attenuation.) A promoter region upstream from, but apparently not part of, the resistance gene cassette has been reported for the fused oxa-10-aadA1 cassette of In53 (176). In complex class 1 integrons, various resistance genes are found downstream from the orf513-containing common region, CR1, an atypical class of insertion sequence now called ISCR1 (189, 251). An involvement of this region in gene expression could be suspected, e.g., from the observation that blaCTX-M-2 downstream from ISCR1 confers high levels of ß-lactam resistance to Enterobacteriaceae (9), while the closely related, chromosome-encoded class A ß-lactamase gene, blaKLUA, from which blaCTX-M-2 is speculated to have been derived, confers only low levels of resistance to its host, Kluyvera ascorbata (115). ISCR1-borne promoter sequences have been identified recently for qnrA, blaCTX-M-2, blaCTX-M-9, and dfrA10 in various gram-negative bacteria (160, 220). A comprehensive compilation of the genes associated with ISCR1 has been published in a recent review (251).
Translational control of gene expression in class 1 integrons. Efficient gene translation normally requires the presence of a translation initiation region (TIR) consisting of the initiation codon, a Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence, and an adequate spacer between them. Typically, the initiation codon ATG (or, less frequently, GTG or, rarely, TTG) is separated by ca. 5 to 15 nucleotides from an SD sequence, made up of any four or more nucleotides (but maybe as few as three) within the sequence AAGGAGG(48, 93, 130). While a canonical TIR is found in the majority of the resistance gene cassettes, examination of published sequences reveals that their presence is not the rule, and in some cases, the mechanism of translation initiation remains obscure.
The absence of a TIR in cassettes inserted at attI of class 1 integrons can be compensated for by the coincidence of two circumstances. The first is the (constant) presence of a short ORF, overlapping the inner boundary of the 5'-conserved segment of the integron, which has an SD sequence (GGAG) eight nucleotides upstream from its initiation codon; the second is the (frequent) occurrence of a stop codon, TAG more often than TAA, at positions 3 to 5 (underlined) in theGTTRRRY core site of the cassette-associated 59-base element. Under these circumstances, insertion of the cassette with the formation of the composite attI1 site (190) results in the placement of a stop codon in phase with the reading frame of the short ORF, which then has a coding capacity for a peptide of 11 amino acids and which, for that reason, has been termed ORF-11 (Fig. 10A) (98).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Possible
functions of ORF-11 in the translation of cassette-associated genes.
SD, Shine-Dalgarno sequence. (A) Translational coupling (a,
b, and c) (see the text). The position of the stop codon in the
recombination core site is underlined. (B) Fusion.
(C) Unknown effect of
ORF-11.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Relative
ORF-11-mediated translation efficiencies. C, control; WT, configuration
depicted in Fig. 10A
(wild type); a, b, and c, mutants with
deletion of fragments a, b, and c as shown in Fig.
10A (data are from
reference
98).
|
Cassette integration at attI1 has also resulted in the generation of an alternative ORF with its coding capacity extended to 18 amino acids (ORF-18), as first evidenced in the nucleotide sequence of the oxa-1 cassette (186). In this case, the TIR and the first 11 amino acids are identical to those of ORF-11, but the stop codon, separated from the translation initiation codon of the oxacillinase gene by a stretch of 45 nucleotides, is apparently not provided by attC. Not surprisingly, this configuration is the same in a cassette named oxa-30 (oxa-1 and oxa-30 are identical) (245), in an oxa-31 cassette, and in an aac(6')-Ib cassette, which encodes an acetyltransferase fused to the N-terminal amino acids of OXA-1 (23, 44, 238). ORF-18 promotes translation of the downstream gene in a way similar to that of ORF-11. Its deletion abolished the translation of oxa-1 fully, as measured in terms of ß-lactamase activity and ticarcillin resistance, while the introduction of an SD sequence (GGAG) in the deletion mutant upstream from the oxacillinase gene restored enzyme production and ß-lactam resistance to their original levels (B. Berçot, unpublished data).
Several cassettes have borrowed the TIR of ORF-11 directly after an in-frame fusion between the resistance gene and the ORF brought about by small sequence duplications or deletions. Such events have occurred in cassettes with associated aminoglycoside 3-N- or 6'-N-acetyltransferase genes in gram-negative bacteria and dihydropteroate synthase genes in Mycobacterium fortuitum and Corynebacterium striatum (Fig. 10B) (163, 173, 267; M. C. Ploy, unpublished data) (GenBank accession number AJ294721). Whether the common presence of ORF-11 and its TIR has any impact on the efficiency of translation of the genes that have their own canonical SD sequence is not clear (Fig. 10C), but the possibility that it augments the recruitment of ribosomes in the vicinity of the initiation codons of these genes could be imagined.
Since the integrons of classes 1, 2, and 3, i.e., those predominantly bearing resistance gene cassettes, possess similar Pc promoters (there is an 18-bp spacer in class 2) at equivalent positions and since the cassettes are considered to be exchangeable between classes (55, 101), it would seem likely that resistance gene transcription in all classes is similarly subject to the mechanisms of control described for class 1 integrons (54, 141). Whether the potential for enhanced translation of cassette-associated genes in class 1 integrons is a trait that has contributed to their predominance over integrons of the other two classes remains a matter of speculation (53, 98).
|
|
|---|
It rapidly appeared that resistance to macrolides occurred with two major phenotypes. Acquisition of an erm(A) or erm(C) determinant in staphylococci yields either dissociated resistance to macrolides with susceptibility to lincosamides or cross-resistance to macrolides and lincosamides, corresponding to inducible and constitutive expression of MLSB resistance, respectively. Inducible expression yields dissociated resistance to macrolides due to differences in the inducing ability of the antibiotics. The genetic basis for induction has been studied in detail in the case of the erm(C) gene of staphylococcal plasmid pE194 (92, 114). Strains harboring erm(C) are resistant to inducer macrolides such as erythromycin and its derivatives (azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and roxithromycin). In contrast, noninducer macrolides such as spiramycin (a 16-membered macrolide), lincosamides (lincomycin and clindamycin), and streptogramins B (pristinamycin I and quinupristin) remain active.
Early studies in the laboratories of B. Weisblum and D. Dubnau showed that induction arises posttranscriptionally according to the model of translation attenuation (92, 114, 263). erm mRNA is synthesized but in an inactive conformation and becomes active only in the presence of inducer macrolides. The inactivity of the mRNA is due to the structure of its 5' end, which has a set of four inverted repeats that sequester the initiation sequences (ribosome binding site and initiation codon) for the methylase by base pairing in the absence of erythromycin (Fig. 12, conformation A). Thus, the methylase cannot be produced, since the initiation motifs for the translation of the enzyme are not accessible to the ribosome. Induction is related to the presence of an open reading frame, encoding a short 14-amino-acid peptide, upstream from the erm(C) structural gene. In the presence of low concentrations of erythromycin, the binding of the antibiotic to a ribosome translating the leader peptide causes the ribosome to stall. Ribosome stalling probably induces the destabilization of the two stem-loop structures of configuration A and other conformational rearrangements in the mRNA. In particular, the formation of the alternative stem-loop structure (Fig. 12, conformation B) would unmask the initiation sequences for the methylase, allowing synthesis to proceed by ribosomes that are not complexed with erythromycin or by those that are methylated. Methylation of some ribosomes might occur through transient rearrangements of the stem-loop structures, which would lead to the synthesis of a basal level of methylase. A third alternate mRNA conformation has been predicted, which could occur at the end of the induction process when the concentration of the inducer macrolide has decreased and the majority of ribosomes are methylated (263).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 12. Alternative
conformations of the mRNA from the inducible erm(C)
gene of pE194. Shown is the secondary structure of the mRNA in the
absence (A) or presence (B) of erythromycin. RBS,
ribosome binding site; LP, leader peptide; ORF, open reading frame; 1,
2, 3, and 4, inverted repeat. Green and red
lines indicate the coding
sequence.
|
The mechanism responsible for the specificity of induction remains poorly understood. It is not related to the class of erm gene but depends on the structure of the specific attenuator, which controls the expression of the erm gene, and, for a given attenuator, the structure of the MLSB antibiotic determines whether a particular macrolide is an inducer or not (167). Probably, the interactions between the macrolide, the leader peptide, and the ribosome are critical for proper ribosome stalling, which is required for induction. In the erm(C) leader peptide, four amino acids, IFVI, are critical for induction (263). A similar sequence is found in specific small peptides encoded in Escherichia coli 23S rRNA by five-codon minigenes (248). These peptides can render cells resistant to low levels of a variety of macrolide antibiotics (247, 249). A "bottle brush" model of action for these macrolide resistance peptides, in which newly translated peptides interact with the macrolide molecule on the ribosome and actively displace it from its binding site, has been proposed (247). Probably, a similar type of interaction between the leader peptide and macrolides can occur. It seems that the leader peptide could be the selector of the site of ribosome stalling in leader mRNA by cis interference with translation, as previously demonstrated for the leader peptides controlling the inducible expression of cat genes (221).
Considering the importance of the leader peptide sequence for specificity of induction, it is not surprising that certain mutations in this sequence lead to changes in the induction patterns. For instance, changes in the relative activity of erythromycin and lincosamides as inducers of erm(C) have been observed (167). These changes, obtained in the laboratory, are not common in clinical isolates.
Control of expression of other erm genes. Many other erm genes, including those detected in pathogenic bacteria, are also inducibly expressed. A model of posttranscriptional regulation similar to that described for erm(C) has been proposed for the regulation of erm(A) (mostly found in staphylococci) and erm(B) (mostly found in streptococci and enterococci). However, the regulatory regions of these determinants are more complex than that of erm(C). The attenuator of erm(A) contains two short control peptides, and induction may involve a series of rearrangements of the inverted repeats (174). The subset of the erm(A) class genes previously called erm(TR), which is mostly present in beta-hemolytic streptococci, has a similar attenuator structure. The 5' end of erm(B) also presents a series of inverted repeats that are responsible for the lack of methylase synthesis in the absence of erythromycin (113). Fourteen pairs of repeats that could form alternative stem-loop structures by base pairing have been identified, and one of them might sequester the ribosome binding site and the initiation codon of the methylase gene. Induction would be related to the presence of sequences coding for a small leader peptide of 36 amino acids upstream from the gene.
The specificity of induction relies, as mentioned above, on the structure of the attenuator and on the precise mode of action of specific MLS compounds. Since the structure of the attenuator differs in each class or subclass of erm gene, different patterns of inducible MLSB resistance are observed. For instance, spiramycin is a common inducer, like erythromycin, of erm(B) expression [whereas it is not an inducer for erm(C) or erm(A)] (51). The genetic background and the bacterial host may also have roles in the specificity of induction, possibly in relation to differences in ribosomal structure or in methylase expression (164).
Again, changes in the sequence of the leader peptide lead to changes in the pattern of inducibility. For instance, a clinical isolate of Enterococcus faecalis that contains an R7C mutation in the putative leader peptide of its erm(B) gene is more strongly induced by tylosin, a 16-membered macrolide, than by erythromycin (183). Similarly, a clinical isolate of S. aureus with an unusual inducible cross-resistance to erythromycin, clindamycin, lincomycin, and quinupristin had mutations in the attenuator of the erm(A) gene (52).
Phenotypes of inducible MLSB resistance. Due to the diversity of the erm genes and the specificity of the corresponding regulators, inducible expression of these genes gives rise to a large variety of phenotypes. However, in practice, since each class of erm gene is preferentially distributed in certain bacterial species, a few major phenotypes of inducible MLSB resistance are observed in staphylococci and streptococci/enterococci.
In staphylococci, inducible expression of erm(A) or erm(C) leads to a similar dissociated phenotype of resistance. The strains are resistant to 14-membered (clarithromycin, dirithromycin, erythromycin, and roxithromycin) and 15-membered (azithromycin) macrolides, which are inducers. In contrast, the noninducer ketolide (telithromycin), 16-membered macrolides available in certain countries (josamycin, midecamycin, miocamycin, rokitamycin, and spiramycin) or in veterinary practice (tylosin), the lincosamides (lincomycin and clindamycin), and streptogramins B (pristinamycin I and quinupristin) remain active. In disk diffusion tests, the blunting of the clindamycin (or any noninducer macrolide) inhibition zone, as in a D-shaped zone, can be observed, provided that a disk of erythromycin is placed nearby (Fig. 13).
![]() View larger version (147K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 13. S.
aureus containing an erm(C) gene that is
inducibly expressed. CM, clindamycin; E, erythromycin; L, lincomycin;
SP, spiramycin; PI, pristinamycin IA (streptogramin factor B); PII,
pristinamycin IIA (streptogramin factor A); PT, pristinamycin; TEL,
telithromycin. A D-shaped zone can be observed for the clindamycin (and
noninducer macrolides) zone of inhibition on the edge closest to the
erythromycin zone of
inhibition.
|
Similarly, in vitro selection of constitutive resistance at a frequency of 107 with clindamycin has been reported for a clinical isolate of Streptococcus pyogenes UCN1 that is inducibly resistant to erythromycin and that harbors an erm(A) [erm(TR) subset] gene. Clindamycin resistance was associated with deletions of 163 and 6 bp, which is probably explained by illegitimate recombination between different parts of the regulatory region, as well as a tandem duplication of 101 bp in the regulatory sequence of the erm(TR) gene (79).
Deletion of the attenuator has been found in constitutively resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus containing erm(C) or erm(A) (134, 232, 265) and Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae containing erm(B) (162, 224). In addition, point mutations in the attenuators of erm(T) of Lactobacillus reuteri (246) or of erm(A) of S. aureus (265) or tandem duplications in the attenuators of erm(C) of S. aureus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Staphylococcus equorum and of erm(A) of S. aureus (102, 152, 185, 232, 266) have been reported.
Probably, constitutive MLSB-resistant isolates have evolved from the inducibly resistant isolates under selective pressure by noninducer macrolide/lincosamide antibiotics. Constitutive production of a methylase confers a characteristic phenotype with cross-resistance to the MLSB drugs, regardless of the nature of the erm gene (Fig. 14). However, the level of resistance may vary according to the degree of methylation of the ribosome. Although all members of the Erm family methylate the adenine of 23S rRNA located at position A2058, they differ in their capacities to monomethylate or dimethylate the nucleotide at this position. The major Erm methylases detected in pathogens, Erm(A), Erm(B), and Erm(C), generally function as dimethylases that confer high-level cross-resistance to MLSB drugs (including telithromycin). However, it has recently been shown, using mass spectrometry to analyze the methylated DNA, that Erm(B) in a Streptococcus pneumoniae background monomethylates the 23S rRNA, which renders cells resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin but not to telithromycin (69). This explains, at least in part, why telithromycin is active against nearly all S. pneumoniae isolates containing erm(B) but is active against only a few S. pyogenes isolates containing that gene (69, 159).
![]() View larger version (143K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 14. S.
aureus containing an erm(C) gene that is
constitutively expressed. CM, clindamycin; E, erythromycin; L,
lincomycin; SP, spiramycin; PI, pristinamycin IA (streptogramin factor
B); PII, pristinamycin IIA (streptogramin factor A); PT, pristinamycin;
TEL,
telithromycin.
|
For streptococci, similar doubts concerning the activity of clindamycin against isolates susceptible to this antibiotic but with an inducible MLSB phenotype can be raised. Although no clinical failure has been reported, the use of clindamycin does not appear to be safe.
Implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory. The reporting of clindamycin susceptibility raises problems when the isolate is resistant to erythromycin. In that case, the detection of inducible MLSB resistance (which is possible only by revealing induction of clindamycin resistance) is required. Disk diffusion is an easy method to detect this phenotype, by placing an erythromycin disk in close proximity to a clindamycin disk on an agar plate (78). A D-shaped zone is specific for the inducible MLSB phenotype. The 2004 CLSI (formerly NCCLS) susceptibility testing standards recommend this approach to detect inducible MLSB resistance in staphylococci. When staphylococci are tested using a broth-based method, particularly when using automated instruments, the CLSI recommends placing erythromycin and clindamycin disks 15 mm apart on the blood agar plate that is routinely used to verify the purity of the bacterial inoculum (120).
Isolates displaying a D-shaped zone should be reported as clindamycin resistant by the laboratory (179). However, the CLSI suggests the possibility of including the comment, "This isolate is presumed to be resistant based on detection of inducible clindamycin resistance. Clindamycin may still be effective in some patients." The final decision, to treat or not to treat the patient with clindamycin, should be based on an analysis of every specific case, and if clindamycin therapy is started, it requires close follow-up of the patient for signs of failure. So far, although it seems reasonable to discourage the use of clindamycin in deep-seated infections or in infections with high bacterial densities that increase the risk of selection of constitutive mutants, there are no criteria to confidently predict the success or the failure of clindamycin therapy in infections due to staphylococci with inducible MLSB resistance. Although the CLSI recommendation is limited to clindamycin, the same reasoning should be applied to telithromycin and 16-membered macrolides in countries where they are available for staphylococci with inducible MLSB resistance.
The inducible MLSB phenotype should be distinguished from another phenotype of dissociated resistance to erythromycin and susceptibility to clindamycin, which is due to the acquisition of msr(A). This gene encodes an inducibly produced efflux pump belonging to the ABC transporters. Erythromycin and related 14- and 15-membered macrolides are inducers and substrates for the pump. In contrast, clindamycin is neither an inducer nor a substrate, and thus, msr(A)-carrying strains are fully susceptible to this compound. Constitutive mutants are resistant to erythromycin but remain fully susceptible to clindamycin. Therefore, the microorganisms that are resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin and that do not display a D-shaped zone are presumably resistant to erythromycin by efflux and can be safely reported as being susceptible to clindamycin. The case of telithromycin is different, since this antimicrobial is not an inducer but is a substrate for the MsrA pump and may select for constitutive resistant mutants. However, there have been no reports of clinical failure of telithromycin therapy for patients with infections caused by telithromycin-susceptible, erythromycin-resistant isolates (60).
Although the issue of detection and reporting of inducible MLSB resistance in streptococci has still not been fully addressed, recommendations similar to those for staphylococci should be made for clindamycin and telithromycin. Pratically, this applies to beta-hemolytic streptococci with the erm(A) gene. Isolates that are resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin and that do not exhibit a D-shaped zone may be safely reported as being susceptible to clindamycin and telithromycin. In this case, resistance is due to an efflux pump encoded by a mef(A) gene for which neither clindamycin nor telithromycin are substrates. This is in contrast with the MsrA pump for which, as mentioned above, telithromycin is a substrate.
Finally, we need more prospective studies of cases of infections due to staphylococci or hemolytic streptococci treated with clindamycin to more definitively define the place of this antimicrobial compound in the treatment of infections due to microorganisms with various macrolide resistance phenotypes.
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»