This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fotedar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Harkness, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fotedar, R.
Right arrow Articles by Harkness, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2007, p. 511-532, Vol. 20, No. 3
0893-8512/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.00004-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species

R. Fotedar,1 D. Stark,1* N. Beebe,2 D. Marriott,1 J. Ellis,3 and J. Harkness1

St. Vincent's Hospital, Department of Microbiology, Sydney, Australia,1 University of Technology Sydney, Institute for the Biotechnology of Infectious Diseases, Broadway, Australia,2 University of Technology Sydney, Department of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, Broadway, Australia3

The genus Entamoeba contains many species, six of which (Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Entamoeba moshkovskii, Entamoeba polecki, Entamoeba coli, and Entamoeba hartmanni) reside in the human intestinal lumen. Entamoeba histolytica is the causative agent of amebiasis and is considered a leading parasitic cause of death worldwide in humans. Although recent studies highlight the recovery of E. dispar and E. moshkovskii from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, there is still no convincing evidence of a causal link between the presence of these two species and the symptoms of the host. New approaches to the identification of E. histolytica are based on detection of E. histolytica-specific antigen and DNA in stool and other clinical samples. Several molecular diagnostic tests, including conventional and real-time PCR, have been developed for the detection and differentiation of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii in clinical samples. The purpose of this review is to discuss different methods that exist for the identification of E. histolytica, E. dispar, and E. moshkovskii which are available to the clinical diagnostic laboratory. To address the need for a specific diagnostic test for amebiasis, a substantial amount of work has been carried out over the last decade in different parts of the world. The molecular diagnostic tests are increasingly being used for both clinical and research purposes. In order to minimize undue treatment of individuals infected with other species of Entamoeba such as E. dispar and E. moshkovskii, efforts have been made for specific diagnosis of E. histolytica infection and not to treat based simply on the microscopic examination of Entamoeba species in the stool. The incorporation of many new technologies into the diagnostic laboratory will lead to a better understanding of the public health problem and measures to control the disease.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia. Phone: 61 2 8382 9196. Fax: 61 2 8382 2989. E-mail: dstark{at}stvincents.com.au


Clinical Microbiology Reviews, July 2007, p. 511-532, Vol. 20, No. 3
0893-8512/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/CMR.00004-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stark, D., Barratt, J. L. N., van Hal, S., Marriott, D., Harkness, J., Ellis, J. T. (2009). Clinical Significance of Enteric Protozoa in the Immunosuppressed Human Population. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 22: 634-650 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Liang, S.-Y., Chan, Y.-H., Hsia, K.-T., Lee, J.-L., Kuo, M.-C., Hwa, K.-Y., Chan, C.-W., Chiang, T.-Y., Chen, J.-S., Wu, F.-T., Ji, D.-D. (2009). Development of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for Detection of Entamoeba histolytica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1892-1895 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tan, K. S. W. (2008). New Insights on Classification, Identification, and Clinical Relevance of Blastocystis spp.. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21: 639-665 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pritt, B. S., Clark, C. G. (2008). Amebiasis. Mayo Clin Proc. 83: 1154-1160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chang, S.-Y., Sun, H.-Y., Ji, D.-D., Lo, Y.-C., Wu, C.-H., Wu, P.-Y., Liu, W.-C., Hung, C.-C., Chang, S.-C. (2008). Cost-Effectiveness of Detection of Intestinal Amebiasis by Using Serology and Specific-Amebic-Antigen Assays among Persons with or without Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3077-3079 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Buss, S., Kabir, M., Petri, W. A. Jr., Haque, R. (2008). Comparison of Two Immunoassays for Detection of Entamoeba histolytica. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2778-2779 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stark, D., van Hal, S., Fotedar, R., Butcher, A., Marriott, D., Ellis, J., Harkness, J. (2008). Comparison of Stool Antigen Detection Kits to PCR for Diagnosis of Amebiasis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1678-1681 [Abstract] [Full Text]