Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About CMR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About CMR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Review

Population-Based Epidemiology and Microbiology of Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections

Kevin B. Laupland, Deirdre L. Church
Kevin B. Laupland
aDepartment of Medicine, Royal Inland Hospital, Kamloops, British Columbia, and Departments of Medicine, Critical Care Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: klaupland@gmail.com
Deirdre L. Church
bDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Medicine, University of Calgary, and Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00002-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Diagnostic hierarchy from positive blood cultures to community-onset bloodstream infection. BSI, bloodstream infection; HO, hospital onset; HCA, health care associated; CA, community associated. The overall triangular area indicates all positive blood cultures, which may represent contamination (first level), transient bacteremia/fungemia (second level), or “true” BSI (third level). Bloodstream infections are further classified into the three mutually exclusive categories of hospital-associated, health care-associated community-onset, and community-associated community-onset BSIs.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1

    Definitions of bloodstream infection and associated entities

    EntityDefinition
    Contamination of blood culturesBlood cultures are positive for growth due to organisms that were not present in the bloodstream
    BacteremiaPresence of viable bacteria in the blood; blood cultures positive for bacterial growth where contamination has been ruled out
    FungemiaPresence of viable fungi in the blood; blood cultures positive for fungal growth where contamination has been ruled out
    Transient bacteremia/fungemiaBrief episode of bacteremia/fungemia that is not associated with infection
    Bloodstream infectionBacteremia/fungemia that is associated with infection
    Hospital-onset bloodstream infectionBloodstream infection that is first identified (culture drawn) ≥48 h after hospital admission and within 48 h following hospital discharge
    Community-onset bloodstream infectionBloodstream infection occurring in an outpatient or first identified (culture drawn) <48 h following admission to hospital
    Health care-associated community-onset bloodstream infectionCommunity-onset bloodstream infection associated with significant prior health care exposure (as evidenced by recent hospitalization, specialized in-home medical services, care in a hospital-based clinic or hemodialysis unit, or residence in a nursing home)
    Community-associated community-onset bloodstream infectionCommunity-onset bloodstream infection not fulfilling criteria for health care-associated infection
    Polymicrobial bloodstream infectionEpisode of bloodstream infection associated with two or more different organisms isolated within 48 h of each other
  • TABLE 2

    Studies comparing health care-associated (HCA) and community-associated (CA) community-onset BSIs

    First author (reference)Setting/populationHCA BSI definitionPatient differences (vs CA BSI)Microbiology (vs CA BSI)Outcome difference (vs CA BSI)
    Friedman (65)Adults admitted to three hospitals in North Carolina (143 with CA BSI and 186 with HCA BSI)Community-onset BSI with any specialized therapy in the home, recent attendance at a hospital, hemodialysis, or chemotherapy clinic, recent hospitalization, or residence in a nursing homeMore likely to have cancer and renal failure with HCA BSI, and less likely to have HIV infectionUrinary tract infection more common in CA BSI; Staphylococcus aureus most common in HCA BSI and Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pneumoniae most common in CA BSI; MRSA much more common in HCA BSI3- to 6-month mortality higher (29% versus 16%; P = 0.019) for HCA BSI than for CA BSI
    Lenz (66)Adult residents of Calgary, Canada (3,088 with CA BSI and 2,492 with HCA BSI)Minor modification of criteria of Friedman et al. (60, 65)Older, more comorbid illness with HCA BSIDifferent distribution of pathogens and higher rates of resistant organisms, including MRSA; more polymicrobial infections with HCA BSILonger length of stay and higher 28-day case fatality rate (18% versus 10%; P < 0.001) with HCA BSI
    Al-Hasan (67)Gram-negative BSI in residents of Olmsted County, MN (306 with HCA BSI and 427 with CA BSI)Per criteria of Friedman et al. (65)Patients with HCA BSI were olderDifferent distribution of infection foci and pathogens; higher rates of resistance with HCA BSIHigher 28-day case fatality rate (15% versus 4%; P < 0.001) with HCA BSI
    Son (50)Patients admitted to nine university hospitals in Korea (380 with CA BSI and 206 with HCA BSI)Per criteria of Friedman et al. (65)Patients with HCA BSI more likely to be male and to have comorbidities and immune-suppressant therapyDifferent distribution of infection foci and pathogens; higher rates of resistance with HCA BSIHigher 30-day case fatality rate (18% versus 10%; P = 0.007) with HCA BSI
    Kollef (68)Adults admitted to seven hospitals in the United States (728 [64%] with HCA BSI and 415 with CA BSI)Recent hospitalization, immune suppression, hemodialysis, or nursing home residencePatients with HCA BSI were older and more likely to be male and to have comorbidities and a higher severity of illnessDifferent distribution of infection pathogens; higher rates of primary BSI and resistance with HCA BSIHigher hospital case fatality (14% versus 4%; P < 0.001) with HCA BSI
    Evans (69)Adults with spinal cord injury admitted to two hospitals in the United States (110 with HCA BSI and 36 with CA BSI)Per criteria of Friedman et al. (65)Patients with HCA BSI were older and more likely to have comorbiditiesTrend for higher rates of resistance with HCA BSINo difference in hospital or 30-day mortality rates
    Valles (70)Adults admitted to three teaching hospitals in Spain (581 with CA BSI and 281 with HCA BSI)Per criteria of Friedman et al. (65)Patients with HCA BSI were older and more likely to have comorbiditiesDifferent distribution of pathogens and higher rates of resistance, including MRSA; more polymicrobial infections with HCA BSIHigher case fatality rate (28% versus 10%; P < 0.001) with HCA BSI
  • TABLE 3

    Population-based studies investigating the overall burden of disease associated with community-onset bloodstream infection

    First author (reference)Setting, yrAnnual incidenceCase fatality rate (%)Mortality per 100,000 population
    Filice (1)Charleston County, SC (population 250,000), 1974–197643 per 100,000Not reportedNot reported
    Uslan (2)Olmsted County, MN (population 124,277), 2003–2005154 per 100,000 (70 per 100,000 were health care associated, and 84 were community acquired)Not reportedNot reported
    Sogaard (3)Northern Denmark (population 500,000), 1992–2006112 per 100,000 (79 per 100,00 were CA, and 34 were HCA) during 2002 to 200617 (15 for CA BSI and 22 for HCA BSI) during 2002 and 200619 (12 for CA BSI and 7 for HCA BSI) during 2002 to 2006
    Laupland (4)Calgary area, Alberta, Canada (population 1 million), 2000–200481.6 per 100,00013 (in hospital)11 (in hospital)
    Laupland (5)Victoria area, British Columbia, Canada (population 358,000), 1998–2005101.2 per 100,00012.6 (in hospital)12.8 (in hospital)
  • TABLE 4

    Contemporary population-based studies investigating the overall burden of Staphylococcus aureus community-onset bloodstream infection

    First author (reference)Population, yrMSSA incidence per 100,000/yrMRSA incidence per 100,000/yrTotal incidence per 100,000/yrMortality (%)
    Morin (63)Four areas in Connecticut, 199814.52.51710 for MSSA, 14 for MRSA, 11 overall (case fatality rates)
    Lyytikainen (82)Finland, 1995–20017<0.1713 (28-day case fatality rate)
    Collignon (83)Australia, 1999–20021521718 (28-day case fatality rate)
    Huggan (84)Canterbury, New Zealand, 1998–200614<0.314Not reported
    Laupland (85) and Tom (86)Multinational, 2000–2008 30-day case fatality rates of 20.2 for MSSA and 22.3 for MRSA, mortality rates of 3.4 for MSSA and 0.3 for MRSA per 100,000 per year
    Canberra, Australia14.52.016.5
    Calgary, Canada15.32.416.5
    Victoria, Canada15.12.417.4
    Sherbrooke, Canada13.01.814.8
    Northern Denmark16.2016.2
    Copenhagen County, Denmark14.70.214.9
    Copenhagen City, Denmark16.50.216.7
    Finland11.90.212.1
    Western Sweden18.1018.2
    Overall15.01.016.0
  • TABLE 5

    Contemporary studies of invasive disease and/or bloodstream infection due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in nonselected populations

    First author (reference)Population, yrAnnual invasive disease incidence per 100,000BSI rate or proportion (%) of isolates in blood
    Rudnick (108)Toronto, Canada, 1995–20119Not reported
    Feemster (109)Philadelphia, PA, 2005–2008Not reported12.3 per 100,000
    Helferty (110)Northern Canada, 1999–201025.8Not reported
    Ingels (111)Denmark, 2000–201017.7 (2008–2010)Not reported
    Rosen (112)Eight U.S. regions, 1998–200913.5 (overall; range of 11.2 to 18 between regions during 2009)Not reported
    Harboe (113)Denmark, 1938–2007Approximately 20 (1998–2007)81
    Weatherholtz (114)Navajo Nation, USA, 1995–200651 (2004–2006)Not reported
    Motlova (115)Czech Republic, 2000–20062.3–4.3Not reported
    Hsieh (116)Taiwan, 20072.6≥94
    Kellner (117)Calgary, Canada, 1998–200711.2 (2003–2007)89
    Baggett (118)Two areas in rural Thailand, 2005–2007Not reported3.7 per 100,000 (Sa Kaeo Province) and 7.6 per 100,000 (Nakhon Phanom Province)
    Bruce (119)Seven circumpolar regions, 1999–200521.6 for Canada (2003–2005), 19.8 for Greenland (2000–2005), 16.2 for Norway (2000–2005), 15.8 for Alaska (2001–2005), 14.6 for Iceland (2000–2005), 11.6 for Finland (2000–2005), 9.1 for Sweden (2003–2005)Not reported
    Heffernan (120)New Zealand, 1998–200512.493
    Lacapa (121)Fort Apache Indian Reserve, USA, 1991–200687 (2001–2006)Not reported
    Klemets (122)Finland, 1995–200210.69.9 per 100,000
    Einarsdottir (123)Iceland, 1975–200416.7 (1990–2004)Not reported
    Stephens (124)Atlanta, GA, 1994–200218 (2000–2002)95
    Andresen (125)Canberra, Australia, 1998–200015.2Not reported
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Population-Based Epidemiology and Microbiology of Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections
Kevin B. Laupland, Deirdre L. Church
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Oct 2014, 27 (4) 647-664; DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00002-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Microbiology Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Population-Based Epidemiology and Microbiology of Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Microbiology Reviews.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Population-Based Epidemiology and Microbiology of Community-Onset Bloodstream Infections
Kevin B. Laupland, Deirdre L. Church
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Oct 2014, 27 (4) 647-664; DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00002-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • INTRODUCTION
    • ESTABLISHING THE PRESENCE OF AND DEFINING COMMUNITY-ONSET BLOODSTREAM INFECTION
    • BURDEN OF COMMUNITY-ONSET BLOODSTREAM INFECTION
    • EMERGENCE OF RESISTANT COMMUNITY-ONSET BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • REFERENCES
    • Author Bios
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CMR
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #ClinMicroRev

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0893-8512; Online ISSN: 1098-6618