Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About CMR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About CMR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Review

Standardization of Assays That Detect Anti-Rubella Virus IgG Antibodies

Wayne Dimech, Liliane Grangeot-Keros, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous
Wayne Dimech
NRL, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wayne@nrl.gov.au
Liliane Grangeot-Keros
Paris-Sud University, AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Virologie, National Reference Laboratory for Maternofetal Rubella Infections, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christelle Vauloup-Fellous
Paris-Sud University, AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Virologie, National Reference Laboratory for Maternofetal Rubella Infections, Villejuif, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00045-15
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

Rubella virus usually causes a mild infection in humans but can cause congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Vaccination programs have significantly decreased primary rubella virus infection and CRS; however, vaccinated individuals usually have lower levels of rubella virus IgG than those with natural infections. Rubella virus IgG is quantified with enzyme immunoassays that have been calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) international standard and report results in international units per milliliter. It is recognized that the results reported by these assays are not standardized. This investigation into the reasons for the lack of standardization found that the current WHO international standard (RUB-1-94) fails by three key metrological principles. The standard is not a pure analyte but is composed of pooled human immunoglobulin. It was not calibrated by certified reference methods; rather, superseded tests were used. Finally, no measurement uncertainty estimations have been provided. There is an analytical and clinical consequence to the lack of standardization of rubella virus IgG assays, which leads to misinterpretation of results. The current approach to standardization of rubella virus IgG assays has not achieved the desired results. A new approach is required.

  • Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Standardization of Assays That Detect Anti-Rubella Virus IgG Antibodies
Wayne Dimech, Liliane Grangeot-Keros, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Nov 2015, 29 (1) 163-174; DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00045-15

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Clinical Microbiology Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Standardization of Assays That Detect Anti-Rubella Virus IgG Antibodies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Microbiology Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Clinical Microbiology Reviews.
Share
Standardization of Assays That Detect Anti-Rubella Virus IgG Antibodies
Wayne Dimech, Liliane Grangeot-Keros, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous
Clinical Microbiology Reviews Nov 2015, 29 (1) 163-174; DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00045-15
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • INTRODUCTION
    • RUBELLA VIRUS
    • RUBELLA VIRUS INFECTION
    • IMMUNE RESPONSE
    • RUBELLA VACCINATION PROGRAMS
    • IMPACT OF VACCINATION
    • RUBELLA VIRUS IgG TESTS
    • RUBELLA STANDARDS
    • EVIDENCE OF LACK OF STANDARDIZATION
    • METROLOGICAL APPROACH TO STANDARDIZATION AND TRACEABILITY
    • PROPOSED REASONS FOR LACK OF STANDARDIZATION
    • ANALYTICAL IMPACT OF POOR STANDARDIZATION
    • CLINICAL IMPACT OF POOR STANDARDIZATION
    • FUTURE APPROACHES
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
    • Author Bios
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About CMR
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #ClinMicroRev

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0893-8512; Online ISSN: 1098-6618