Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About CMR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About CMR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Review

Organization of the Skin Immune System and Compartmentalized Immune Responses in Infectious Diseases

Juarez Antonio Simões Quaresma
Juarez Antonio Simões Quaresma
aCenter of Biological and Health Sciences, State University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
bEvandro Chagas Institute, Ministry of Health, Ananindeua, PA, Brazil
cTropical Medicine Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
dSchool of Medicine, São Paulo University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Juarez Antonio Simões Quaresma
DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00034-18
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

The skin is an organ harboring several types of immune cells that participate in innate and adaptive immune responses. The immune system of the skin comprises both skin cells and professional immune cells that together constitute what is designated skin-associated lymphoid tissue (SALT). In this review, I extensively discuss the organization of SALT and the mechanisms involved in its responses to infectious diseases of the skin and mucosa. The nature of these SALT responses, and the cellular mediators involved, often determines the clinical course of such infections. I list and describe the components of innate immunity, such as the roles of the keratinocyte barrier and of inflammatory and natural killer cells. I also examine the mechanisms involved in adaptive immune responses, with emphasis on new cytokine profiles, and the role of cell death phenomena in host-pathogen interactions and control of the immune responses to infectious agents. Finally, I highlight the importance of studying SALT in order to better understand host-pathogen relationships involving the skin and detail future directions in the immunological investigation of this organ, especially in light of recent findings regarding the skin immune system.

INTRODUCTION

The concept of organ-specific immunity and its implications on the evolution of diseases, especially infectious diseases, were proposed by Engwerda and Kaye in 2000 (1). In this context, it is possible to divide the pattern of tissue immune responses into three major groups: barrier epithelium immune responses, complex organ immune responses, and immunologically privileged organ immune responses (2). The skin is an archetype of organs involved in mechanical and immunological barriers to pathogens and in body homeostasis (3–7). Tissues that form host–environment interfaces, including mucosal surfaces, represent the primary stage of defense against pathogenic microorganisms (8–11). The skin has a similar organization over most of the body, but certain regions, such as the feet, scalp, and genitalia, have specific and highly specialized adaptations. The skin comprises the epidermis, dermis, cutaneous appendages, and subcutaneous tissue (12). It has a complex immune system that is histologically represented by skin-associated lymphoid tissue (SALT), which includes dendritic cells (DCs), mast cells, B and T lymphocytes, and keratinocytes (13). In certain situations, such cells may modulate the cascade of the local immune responses (14, 15). SALT acts by protecting the body against foreign microorganisms and plays a role in the pathophysiology of inflammatory diseases such as autoimmune and hypersensitivity disorders (8–13). Such diseases have pathogenetic mechanisms that are generally mediated by T lymphocytes and respond to immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory therapy (7).

The epidermis is constituted by three major cell populations: keratinocytes, melanocytes, and Langerhans cells (LCs). It has four distinct layers: the stratum basale, stratum spinosum, stratum granulosum, and stratum corneum (12, 13). The stratum basale (or basal stratum) is composed of a layer of undifferentiated cells in constant mitotic activity (16). From the basal stratum, cells differentiate to form the stratum spinosum (or spinous stratum), which produces keratin. The stratum granulosum is composed of keratinocytes that have blackened granules in their cytoplasm and produce keratin-forming proteins, in addition to lipids (17, 18). Finally, the stratum corneum contains keratinocytes in later stages of maturity. It eliminates most agents that are potentially toxic to the organism and helps maintain hydroelectrolytic homeostasis (18). In the basal stratum, melanocytes help protect DNA from UV radiation by producing melanin and by promoting expression of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) proteins (19–24). Merkel cells in the epidermis are responsible for skin somesthesia (sensibility), along with LCs, whose functions are discussed below. In addition to these cells, in the basal and corneum layers are T lymphocytes, most of which are CD8+ lymphocytes (4, 7, 9, 14, 17, 18).

The dermis is characterized by a complex organization and a diverse immune cell population. This region contains specialized immune cells such as DCs, CD4+ T lymphocytes, γδ T lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, mast cells, macrophages, neurons, lymphatic vessels, and blood vessels, which are responsible for the efflux of cells from the blood into the skin (Fig. 1) (7, 9, 13, 15, 16).

FIG 1
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1

Schematic representation of the distribution of immune cells that form the skin-associated lymphoid tissue (SALT) in the epidermis and dermis of the skin.

IMMUNE SYSTEM AND THE SKIN

The skin has a complex network of cells that constitute SALT. Table 1 presents the various cellular components that make up the skin immune system (13). In addition to the immune cells themselves, certain skin cells, such as keratinocytes and melanocytes, may also affect local immune responses by releasing cytokines, which can modulate inflammatory responses (13). Therefore, the skin is an immunologically complex organ that has the ability to respond to infectious and noninfectious aggressive agents through innate and adaptive immunity mechanisms (9, 14, 15).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Cells that make up the immune system of the skin, its specific markers, activation factors and factors released in the cascade of immune responsea

KeratinocytesKeratinocytes are epithelial cells that are interconnected by intercellular bridges (tight junctions). They play important roles in maintaining the mechanical and barrier functions of the epidermis, and they contribute to the pathophysiology of infectious and inflammatory processes by producing cytokines and by expressing MHC class I and II glycoproteins (13, 15, 25, 26). Similar to the epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract, keratinocytes can distinguish between the microbiota and potentially pathogenic agents, and they can recognize highly conserved structures known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (13, 27–29). PAMPs are often important for the survival, colonization, or invasion of microorganisms and are generally composed of lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), flagellins, nucleic acids, unmethylated CpG DNA sequences, teichoic acids, mannose-rich oligosaccharides, and other compounds (29, 30). The recognition of PAMP ensures that there is no activation of mechanisms to escape the host immune response, as is observed in the pathophysiology of some infections (31, 32). Molecules that bind to PAMPs are known as pattern recognition receptors (PPRs) and include the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (29). The activation of TLR pathways occurs upon binding of PAMPs and induces a cascade of innate and adaptive immunity. Several TLRs are expressed in epidermal keratinocytes and are located on the cell surface (TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR6) as well as in endosomes (TLR3 and TLR9). Moreover, TLR7 expression may be induced by the activation of TLR3 by double-stranded RNA molecules involved in immune responses to viruses (29). These factors indicate that the activation of TLRs by keratinocytes is crucial for triggering dermal immune responses, leading to a predominantly T helper cell type 1 (Th1) response accompanied by the activation of type I interferons (IFNs), including interferon alpha (IFN-α) and beta (IFN-β) (29, 30).

Similar to TLRs, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) can recognize PAMPs and endogenous PAMP analogs, danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) (29, 33). They play important roles in the recognition of substances such as irritants and toxins. The induction of NLRs results in the activation of proinflammatory signaling pathways through inflammasomes, which are protein complexes composed of an NLR, an adapter protein termed ASC (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain [CARD]), and pro-caspase-1 (29, 33). Activation of caspase-1 through inflammation leads to the cleavage of pro-interleukin-1β (pro-IL-1β) and pro-IL-18, which, in turn, leads to the expression of proinflammatory cytokines that activate immune cells and induce an elaborate immune response to harmful agents (34–36).

Keratinocytes produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) called defensins and cathelicidins, which are part of a highly conserved eukaryotic cell defense mechanism. AMPs are expressed on the injured epithelium to counteract the invasion of microorganisms by killing pathogens, activating immune cells, or modulating cytokine profiles (37). Keratinocytes produce cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IL-18, IL-22, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). In the presence of an infection, IL-17 and IL-22 can activate the production of AMPs by keratinocytes, constituting a form of innate immune response (38–44). Particular importance has been attached to the pleotropic cytokine IL-1, which is capable of inducing a broad spectrum of biological effects, including the activation of helper T cells and DCs and the maturation and clonal expansion of B cells (43). Under physiologic conditions, keratinocytes secrete both IL-1α and IL-1β in biologically inactive forms. IL-1β is released following the activation of inflammasomes in response to UV radiation. IL-1α appears to be involved in the induction of inflammatory lesions in psoriasis, with neutrophil infiltration into the epidermis, by increasing the expression of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20) by keratinocytes. Studies have demonstrated that a reduction in the level of caspase-8 leads to active IL-1α secretion from the pro-IL-1α pool in mouse keratinocytes (43).

The activation of chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 9 (CXCL9), CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL20 by keratinocytes can attract effector T cells to the skin in diseases characterized by T cell infiltration, such as psoriasis (44). The expression of CXCL1 and CXCL8 by keratinocytes may attract neutrophils to the epidermis in inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis, and furthermore, CCL20 may influence the trafficking to the epithelium of LC precursors (45, 46). Keratinocytes can express MHC-II in various skin diseases characterized by leukocyte infiltration, which implies that they function as nonspecific antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Keratinocytes can also induce CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte responses by expressing Th1 or Th2 cytokines (46, 47). The activation of keratinocytes is important in inflammation and precedes the influx of lymphocytes into the epidermis following skin reactions to inflammatory mediators. The participation of keratinocytes in various skin immune response mechanisms implies their significant roles in the induction of inflammatory processes and in the control of skin conditions, such as cutaneous leishmaniasis, human papillomavirus (HPV), and staphylococcus infections (48–52).

MelanocytesMelanocytes produce melanin, a pigment that is responsible for skin color and protection of keratinocytes against the harmful action of UV radiation, which can induce DNA damage (19–21). These cells derive from the neural crest and can control innate and adaptive local immune responses, promoting pathogen phagocytosis and the production of cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and chemokines. In the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases such as vitiligo, melanocytes express MHC-II, and possibly also molecules recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (19–22). A number of studies have shown that skin melanocytes can be compromised by infectious viral agents such as alphavirus, varicella-zoster virus, and parvovirus and by bacteria such as Mycobacterium leprae and Leptospira, among others (3, 23). This dual role of melanocytes, functioning both as targets and as a source of immune factors, along with their involvement in the pathophysiology of important infectious diseases, such as HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV), makes the alteration of skin pigmentation an important symptom observed in the clinical course of these infections (24, 53). Upon contact with infectious agents of diverse nature, melanocytes can also express a variety of TLRs, including TLR1, -2, -3, -4, -6, -7, and -9 (22), with release of IL-6 and IL-8, and show increased chemokine mRNA expression involved in the recruitment of leukocytes, such as CCL2, CCL3, and CCL5 (3, 20, 22). Finally, similar to keratinocytes and other cells with immune functions in skin, melanocytes may express IFN type I and constitute the first line of defense against viruses in the skin (54, 55).

APCs and Skin ImmunologyIn general, skin APCs are localized in the epidermis and dermis (Table 1). Skin APCs have been classified according to their embryogenic origin. In this sense, we can classify subpopulations of APCs as classic APCs or classical DCs, which are represented by a cell population with stellate morphology, high expression of MHC-II, and the ability to migrate to the lymph nodes, activating naive T lymphocytes (56–60). A second population of APCs of the skin is represented by tissue-resident macrophages, monocytes, and other monocyte-derived cells (58, 59).

More recent ontogeny studies have shown that LCs are resident macrophages of the epidermis. However, despite this finding, LCs have functional characteristics similar to those of classic DCs, especially the ability to migrate to the lymph nodes and stimulate T lymphocytes responses (57). Studies of ontogeny, coupled with the functional characterization of LCs, have led to a great controversy in recent years concerning the identity of LCs, which were reinforced by transcriptomic analysis (56, 57). These analyses indicated that LCs are a distinct population of both DCs and macrophages, suggesting that the epidermal tissue microenvironment acts in the early stages of development of LCs, modulating their biological characteristics, despite their ontogeny (57). In this way, we can functionally consider LCs a subtype of DCs for the purpose of our discussion (59, 60).

LCs are the major DCs dispersed in the epidermis, whereas dermal DCs are located in the skin, immediately below the dermal-epidermal junction (13, 61–65).

DCs consist of several subpopulations of APCs that play important roles in the activation of immune responses (Table 1). They are produced continuously from hematopoietic precursors in the bone marrow and are distributed as immature cells in both lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues (65, 66). The term dendritic cells was first used in 1973 by Steinman and Cohn based on their studies of the morphology of cells found in the lymph nodes of mice (66).

Four distinct human DC subtypes have been delineated based on biological studies of these cells in human skin: LCs, dermal dendrocytes (DDs), plasmocytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), and inflammatory dendritic cells (iDCs) (Table 1). LCs and DDs express myeloid markers, including CD13 and CD33 (13, 61–72). However, LCs exclusively express CD1a, Birbeck granules, langerin, and E-cadherin adhesion molecule (73). In contrast, DDs exclusively express the blood coagulation factor XIIIa. LCs and DDs may activate naive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, with subsequent secretion of IL-12 (74–76). However, DDs can induce the differentiation of naive B cells into immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells, whereas LCs cannot (Table 1) (77, 78).

pDCs resemble immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells when visualized by ultrastructural microscopy. They are found in the thymus, blood tissues, and the lymph node T cell zone. pDCs secrete large quantities of interferon alpha following viral stimulation (13, 71, 79). In this context, precursor pDCs in blood correspond to natural IFN-α-producing cells, suggesting that they play an important role during viral infections. Unlike LCs and DDs, IL-3 induces pDC differentiation and promotes the expression of the myeloid markers CD14, CD13, and CD33. pDCs are devoid of mannose receptors and express high levels of CD123. However, like LCs and DDs, pDCs also activate CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T lymphocytes and secrete IL-12 during viral infections (Table 1) (13, 71, 79, 80).

iDCs are characterized by the expression of CD206 (macrophage mannose receptor) and are observed in inflamed epidermal tissues of patients with various inflammatory skin diseases. These cells express an Fc-like receptor that has a high affinity for immunoglobulin E (IgE) and is involved in allergen-specific inflammatory processes. Although these cellular activities have been described to occur in the epidermis, they are involved in inflammatory processes in both the epidermis and dermis (Table 1) (67, 80).

Three main characteristics are attributed to DCs: capture, processing, and antigen presentation to T cells (67).

Endocytic activity is high in immature DCs, whereas this characteristic is less apparent in mature cells. DCs degrade antigens within the MHC class II endosomal compartment and subsequently display them on their surface bound to MHC-II (81, 82). Such antigens are captured by phagocytosis involving membrane receptors, and DCs can capture whole cells, including those undergoing necrosis and apoptosis (67). In contact with foreign particles of microbial or endogenous origin, the process of maturation of DCs begins with the expression of MHC class II glycoproteins, with increased ability of DCs to capture antigens. Following antigen incorporation, molecules that facilitate migration to the lymph nodes adhere to DCs (68–72). The DCs then interact with lymphocytes, and there is an increase in the expression of cytokines and costimulatory molecules. The activation of costimulatory molecules in DCs induces signals that cooperate with T cell receptors (TCRs) to promote T cell activation. Among these costimulatory molecules, B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) molecules are expressed by DCs, macrophages, and lymphocytes. B7 stimulates molecules present on T lymphocytes, known as CD28, which are responsible for the secondary signs of T lymphocyte activation (83). Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), encoded by the PDCD1 gene, is a 288-amino-acid receptor that belongs to the B7/CD28 superfamily and is involved in the regulation of T cell activity. It is expressed on the surface of T, B, and NK cells and some subclasses of DCs and monocytes, as well as in the cytoplasm of T CD4+ and Treg lymphocytes (84–87). There is also an increase in the level of MHC-II expression in DCs. DC maturation is complete when they receive a stimulus to migrate to lymphatic tissues. DCs provide three signals that allow antigen-specific CD4+ T cells to initiate proliferation and differentiation (68–72). They capture antigens and readily degrade them to produce antigenic linear peptides of at least 13 amino acids in length that are capable of binding to MHC class II molecules and are trimmed by peptidases to no more than 17 amino acids in length (88). Subsequently, DCs express on their surface a high density of MHC class II/peptide complexes for TCR recognition expressed by T CD4+ cells (signal 1) and costimulation receptors CD40 and B7 to induce the proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes (signal 2) (89). IL-12 secretion by DCs (signal 3) induces CD4+ lymphocyte maturation in cell types 1 and 2. Dendritic cells are quite heterogeneous in the skin, but individual subsets can be identified by the careful use of markers. However, a successful functional analysis of these subsets of dendritic cells requires systems that allow the analysis of individual subsets, with the use of techniques involving separation of cell populations, culture in vitro, and antigenic challenge of these cells with specific antigens (Table 1) (57, 90).

Inflammasomes and Infectious Skin DiseasesThe inflammasomes are constituted by a group of complex proteins of innate immunity (Fig. 2). They act as mediators of inflammatory responses to PAMPs and DAMPs. Inflammasomes induce the activation of caspase-1, the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18, and pyroptotic cell death (91, 92). Depending on the type of caspase involved, they can be classified into one of two types of signaling pathways: classical/canonical, which requires the activation of caspase-1, and noncanonical, which uses other caspases to cause inflammation (91–93).

FIG 2
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2

Schematic representation of the components of the inflammasome and its role in the production of proinflammatory cytokines. NLRP inflammasome activation can be induced by cytosolic PAMPs and DAMPs, leading to IL-1β and IL-18 activation. Activation of caspase-1 by the inflammasome may also induce pyropitosis.

The PRRs involved in the formation of inflammasomes include the NLRs. Their basic structure consists of a variable N-terminal effector domain, a central NACHT (central nucleotide binding domain/NOD) domain, and a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) C-terminal region (92). There are 22 types and four subfamilies of NLRs in humans, classified according to their N-terminal acid activation domain (NLRA), BIR (baculovirus-inhibitor-repeat)-type domain (NLRB), activation and recruitment of caspase domain (NLRC), and pyrin domain (NLRP) (91). The accessory molecule ASC is an adapter protein common to several inflammasomes. Two protein domains constitute this molecule: an N-terminal PYD (pyrin domain) and a C-terminal CARD. These molecules actively participate during the development of the inflammasome, establishing the connection between the NLR and pro-caspase (Fig. 2). Twelve caspases are known in humans and are classified into inflammatory caspases (caspase-1, -4, and -5), and apoptotic caspases (which are further divided into initiator caspase-2, -8, -9, and -10 and executioner caspase-3, -6, and -7). Caspase-1 is the key inflammatory caspase that activates IL-1β and IL-18 cytokines and the pyroptotic mediator gasdermin D (91, 93). Other caspases may also be involved in the release of cytokines and pyroptosis. Caspase-4 and -5 are activated by Gram-negative bacteria, which may cleave gasdermin D, contributing to pyroptosis. Caspase-8 can induce inflammatory responses and apoptotic cell death; it forms the inflammasome and leads to the activation of IL-1β, IL-18, and gasdermin D. Caspase-8 participates in the induction of a noncanonical pathway that activates IL-1β independently of caspase-1, through the dectin-1 receptor (also known as a lectin C receptor family member) (91, 93).

The inflammasome canonical pathway activation begins when NLRs recognize an intracellular PAMP or DAMP, which leads to the recruitment of the adapter ASC in a PYD-PYD binding step. Subsequently, via a CARD-CARD linkage, pro-caspase-1 binds to the ASC (Fig. 2). This complex leads to the canonical activation of the inflammasome, resulting in the production of IL-1β and IL-18 and induction of pyroptosis (93).

The inflammasome noncanonical pathway can follow two routes. In the first, caspases-4 and -5 are activated by LPS from Gram-negative bacteria, activating gasdermin D, causing pyroptosis, which triggers the activation of the NACHT, LRR, and PYD domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome. This attracts caspase-1, resulting in production of IL-1β. The second noncanonical pathway involves the activation of caspase-8 following the recognition of PAMPs by C-type lectin receptors, which leads to the production of IL-1β independently of caspase-1 (Fig. 2) (91, 93).

Inflammasomes have an important role in the host immune response to certain skin infectious diseases, such as cutaneous leishmaniasis and leprosy (93–95). In cutaneous leishmaniasis, the response of macrophages begins when the parasite invades and multiplies within the macrophage, which can kill the parasite through the production of free radicals (94). Macrophages may also act as APCs for T lymphocytes. The role of the inflammasome in macrophages infected with species of the genus Leishmania was evaluated by Lima-Junior and colleagues (95). These authors demonstrated that, in macrophages infected by Leishmania amazonensis, caspase-1 and IL-1β are activated (95). IL-1β production is caspase-1 dependent, because casp1−/− animals do not produce caspase-1 or IL-1β upon infection with L. amazonensis. IL-1β expression and caspase-1 activation were lower in cells treated with L. amazonensis than in cells treated with LPS and nigericin (NLRP3 activators), indicating that the parasite inhibits inflammasome activation in some cases (95, 96). The functions of NLRP3 in parasite elimination were demonstrated in an assay in which macrophages of Nos2−/−, Asc−/−, casp1−/−, or NLRP3−/− mice, when infected with Leishmania, had a higher number of infected cells and more amastigotes (the tissue stage of the parasite) than macrophages from normal animals. Furthermore, potassium, cathepsins, and K+ channels are required for L. amazonensis to activate NLRP3 (97, 98). Inflammasome-deficient cells did not show increased leishmanicidal activity or nitric oxide (NO) production when treated with exogenous IL-1β. That is, inflammasomes seem to be involved in the process of macrophage resistance (99–101). L. amazonensis-infected macrophages show decreased expression of nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) and IFN-γ, but not of TNF-α, indicating that inflammasomes may contribute to the efficient production of IFN-γ and IL-1β. NO production by inflammasomes may also restrict the multiplication of the parasite via a mechanism involving IL-1β and IFN-γ (96–98).

In leprosy infections, dectin-1 acts as a C-type lectin PRR. It is present primarily in DCs and is targeted with the induction of the Th1 and Th17 protective response. According to a study by Gringhuis and coworkers (102), dectin-1 acts as an extracellular sensor for mycobacterial PAMPs and directly activates caspase-8 for pro-IL-1β processing. IL-1β expression in response to the stimulation of DCs with Mycobacterium leprae is induced primarily via dectin-1 and is completely dependent on caspase-8. Thus, recognition of M. leprae by dectin-1 results in the noncanonical activation of caspase-8-dependent inflammasomes and pro-IL-1β processing (103, 104). The pathogen–dectin-1 bond acts as a trigger for the formation and activation of a noncanonical inflammasome complex—consisting of CARD9, Bcl-10, MALT1, caspase-8, and ASC—which converts pro-IL-1β to its biologically active form. While PRRs such as NLRs recognize pathogens intracellularly, dectin-1 detects M. leprae PAMPs extracellularly, enabling a rapid response to the pathogen without the need for internalization. The existence of a caspase-8-dependent noncanonical inflammasome emphasizes the diversity and versatility of immune responses to infection (103–106).

Neutrophils and MacrophagesBlood neutrophils are recruited to the sites of tissue infection or injury by multiple-step processes that are dependent on selectins, integrins, and chemokines (107, 108). When these cells are recruited to a site of infection they express receptors that recognize and bind to microorganisms, ingesting and destroying them by phagocytosis and microbicidal molecules present in phagolysosomes (109, 110). These microbicidal molecules can be grouped into three main classes: reactive oxygen species (ROS), NO, and proteolytic enzymes (111).

The mononuclear phagocytic system includes monocytes (circulating in blood) and macrophages (resident in tissues) (112, 113). Macrophages play important roles in innate and adaptive immunity and are located in organs and connective tissue. Skin macrophages can migrate to the lymph nodes under immunologic conditions (112, 113). Macrophages are part of a group of cells that undergo phenotypic modification and express receptors, costimulatory molecules such as CD163, CD68, CD80, CD86, and CD206, and cytokines that induce the development of suppressive or proinflammatory responses (Fig. 3) (112–114).

FIG 3
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3

Phenotypic subpopulations of macrophages and their differentiation based on the specific profile of cytokines and chemokines. Each subpopulation is involved in specific physiological and pathological processes and the expression of a particular profile of cytokines, enzymes, and metalloproteinases, which may contribute to microbicidal, regenerative, and atherosclerotic plaques.

More recent studies have shown that like for DCs, different phenotypes of macrophages can be identified by the expression of HLA-DR, CD163, arginase, and MRP8 (115–118). These studies identified three different macrophage populations: (i) M1 macrophages, which characteristically express HLA-DR, (ii) M2 macrophages, identified by the presence of CD163 and arginase, and (iii) M4 macrophages, characterized by the expression of MRP8 (Fig. 3) (115–118). Macrophages ingest microorganisms by phagocytosis, which is the energy-dependent envelopment of large particles. Microbial destruction in macrophages occurs in phagolysosomes, vesicles formed from the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes during phagocytosis, necessarily involving enzymes and ROS (112, 119–123). Macrophages have high-affinity receptors that bind to antibody molecules, complement proteins, and lectin, which are essential receptors for the phagocytosis of many different microbes. Increasing evidence suggests a new subpopulation of macrophages known as M4. M0 macrophage differentiation gives rise to M4 macrophages in the presence of CXCL4; M4 macrophages produce IL-6, TNF-α, MRP8, MMP7, MMP12, and CD68 (118, 124, 125). The first reports of M4 macrophages showed that these cells are abundant in atherosclerotic lesions, where the expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) by macrophages is increased. This provokes the accumulation of fat in phagocytes, causing the development of atheroma plaques and consequent oxidative lesions. However, recent data have pointed to the expression of LDL-R in infectious skin lesions such as leishmaniasis and leprosy, which demonstrates a possible association and role of M4 macrophages in immune responses to these diseases in the skin (Fig. 3) (118, 124–130).

M17 and Mreg (regulatory) macrophages have also been proposed, in addition to the subpopulations described above. However, their characterization and involvement in the physiological and pathological processes of the skin and other organs require further investigation (115, 117).

Finally, it is important to emphasize that both macrophages and DCs of the skin are characterized by a marked phenotypic heterogeneity that reflects their diversity and involvement in the various types and stages of cutaneous immune responses.

Basophils and Mast CellsThe morphology and physiology of basophils and mast cells are similar; however, basophils are found predominantly in blood, while mast cells are mainly found in tissue (131, 132). According to their tissue distribution and enzymatic composition of their granules, it is possible to distinguish at least two subpopulations of mast cells: mucosal mast cells, which contain trypsin, and connective tissue mast cells, which contain chymotrypsin. A high-affinity receptor for IgE is expressed by basophils and mast cells, which is strongly bound to their surfaces, leading to degranulation and the release of various substances, including serotonin, histamine, platelet-activating factor, and leukotrienes (Table 1) (133, 134).

Mast cells constitute one of the most abundant cell populations of the skin and express complement C5a (CD88) receptors (132). Their location in the dermis, their ability to release vasoactive and proinflammatory substances, and the expression of IgE receptors on their surfaces imply that they have important roles in the immunity of the skin to infectious or harmful agents (132–134). Mast cells are probably involved in the mechanisms of fibroblast proliferation, blood flow control, and angiogenesis (135–139). These functions are implicated in extracellular matrix remodeli and in the cicatricial (scarring) and fibrotic processes associated with skin lesions (Table 1) (139).

EosinophilsEosinophils are abundant cells in the inflammatory infiltrates of late-phase reactions. These cells are granulocytes derived from bone marrow and are involved in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and infections (140, 141). Th2 profile cytokines promote eosinophil activation and recruitment at sites of inflammation, stimulating the release of granular proteins that are toxic to parasitic helminths, particularly nematodes, and actively participate in the inflammatory cascade underlying allergic processes (141–146). The presence of such parasites is linked to the production of IgEs, which bind to parasites and trigger the release of various eosinophil-derived microbicidal substances, such as cationic proteins, peroxidase, and neurotoxins (147, 148). Eosinophils can also release prostaglandins that may induce vasodilation and chemotaxis by neutrophils, leukotrienes involved in allergic skin diseases, and cytokines (Table 1) (148).

NK and Natural Killer T (NKT) CellsNK cells are lymphocytes that do not express T or B cell receptors (149). They can participate in both innate immunity and adaptive immunity via antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, the downregulation of MHC class I expression, or IL-12 stimulation with IFN-γ release (Table 1) (150–152). They can also produce granzyme, perforin, and granulysin and thereby participate in the direct destruction of microorganisms and neoplastic cells. Furthermore, they play key roles in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and infectious skin diseases (153). They are detected primarily by the expression of CD16 (phagocytosis and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity), CD56 (an NCAM-neural cell adhesion molecule), and CD57 (HNK-1 sulfated carbohydrate chain). NK cells also release TNF-α, GM-CSF (a growth-stimulating factor for granulocyte and monocyte colonies), and IL-3. These cells also promote macrophage activation, leading to phagocytosis and the destruction of microorganisms (150, 151).

Another type of NK cell is the NKT cell. NKT cells have both NK and T cell characteristics and are also capable of releasing cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-22, and IL-17; these cytokines are involved in the activation of macrophages and in the maintenance of epithelial barrier integrity, which stimulates the generation of antimicrobial peptides and production of chemokines in the skin (Table 1) (154). Moreover, they can express chemokine receptors such as CXCR3, CCR5, and CCR6, which facilitate the recruitment of lymphocytes. Despite their role in inducing skin inflammation in experimental mouse models of psoriasis, further studies are needed to elucidate the role of NKT cells in this process (155–157).

ILCsDuring hematopoiesis, lymphoid precursors give rise to T and B cells, which have specific antigen receptors that are characteristic of each of these subpopulations (158). Until recently, it was thought that there were only two subpopulations that had no characteristic antigen receptors. The first subpopulation has already been described as NK cells. The second subtype comprises lymphoid tissue-inducing (LTI) cells, which are important for lymphoid tissue development, including Peyer’s patches, lymph nodes, and other lymphoid cells (159). However, more recently, cells resembling LTI cells have been identified and termed NK22 cells. These cells concomitantly present markers of NK cells and express the cytokine IL-22 (160, 161). Both LTI and NK22 cells are now considered a subtype of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), referred to as ILC3 cells (Table 1).

Studies have indicated the importance of ILCs in responses to infections, especially with helminths. These cells are observed in tissues such as the gut and appear to play key roles in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis and skin infections. Recently, they were named innate lymphoid cells (108) and were divided into three categories according to the adaptive response phenotype mediated by T CD4+ helper lymphocytes—namely, ILC1 (Th1), ILC3 (Th17), and ILC2 (Th2)—which are, respectively, directed against intracellular agents, extracellular microbes, and large parasites. Furthermore, they appear to play a central role in the control of adaptive immune responses (108, 161).

B LymphocytesB lymphocytes typically play a central role in the humoral immune response because they synthesize antibodies (162). In addition to their central role in antibody production, B lymphocytes can function as APCs and produce cytokines that affect tissue and systemic immunity (163) (Table 1). Moreover, recent evidence suggests a role for B lymphocytes in both homeostasis and pathological processes involving the skin associated with local immune responses in neoplastic and infectious processes. B lymphocytes are rarely observed in normal skin, and although several techniques have been used to characterize this population, the specific roles of B cells in dermal homeostasis and immunological surveillance have not been fully clarified (164).

Nevertheless, B lymphocytes are known to migrate to the skin through the endothelium and interact with receptors of selectins, chemokines, and integrins (165). B lymphocytes migrate toward the antigenic focus, where APCs activate naive lymphocytes present in the tissue microenvironment (166).

In the pathophysiology of infectious and inflammatory skin processes, B cells can exhibit both proinflammatory and suppressive effects. Infiltration by B lymphocytes has been observed in cutaneous lesions in leishmaniasis, as well as in inflammatory diseases such as atopic dermatitis (166–168). The mechanisms by which B cells contribute to inflammatory skin pathogenesis occur through their interaction with components of innate immunity and with T lymphocytes (166). In Staphylococcus aureus skin infections, B lymphocytes play an important role in the synthesis of specific antibodies, as well as in bacterial opsonization and in the induction of phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils (169, 170). More recently, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) have been identified and appear to play an important role in attenuating inflammation and inducing the maintenance of immune tolerance mechanisms through the release of IL-10 (171, 172) (Table 1).

T LymphocytesThere are approximately twice as many local lymphocytes in normal skin as there are in the blood. Although the presence of T cells in the skin was first described some 70 years ago, this population of lymphocytes has attracted scientific attention only within the last 25 years (173, 174). The skin has a phenotypically heterogeneous population of lymphocytes, mainly comprised of memory T cells (Fig. 4 and Table 1) (175, 176). In the epidermis, T cells are located in the suprabasal and basal strata, close to LCs (Fig. 1) (176). In the dermis, T cells are distributed in clusters around the capillaries; they are also frequently found at the dermo-epidermal junction and around cutaneous appendages. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes are present in the skin in similar proportions, and most of these are memory T cells (177). The skin has a heterogeneous population of T lymphocytes that participate in classical immune responses, including Th1, Th2, Th3, Th17, and regulatory T (Treg) cells, which have been found in the skin in various infectious and inflammatory diseases (13). More recently, differentiated subpopulations involved in specific physiological and pathological processes have been identified, including Th9, Th22, and Th25 lymphocytes (Fig. 4 and Table 1) (178–180). In the case of infections by intracellular microorganisms, Th1 cells predominantly release IFN-γ and lymphotoxins, leading to the activation of macrophages with microbicidal activity (181). Classically, Th1 lymphocytes in the skin are associated with the resolution of infections and the pathogenesis of autoimmune or immunomediated diseases such as psoriasis (181, 182). In immunocompromised patients, Th2 cells participate in the inflammatory response to infectious agents and are referred to in the context of allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis (181, 183). Th3 lymphocytes were primarily identified in oral tolerance models (184–186). They are characterized predominantly by the production of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and secondarily by the production of IL-4 and IL-10, which are involved in the class switching of B cells to produce IgA, with inhibitory effects on Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes (185–195). In view of the ability of Th3 profile lymphocytes to stimulate the production of antigen-specific lymphocytes, and to inhibit the production of non-antigen-specific lymphocytes, these cells can be considered a subtype of Treg lymphocytes (Fig. 4 and Table 1) (181–195).

FIG 4
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4

Diversity in helper T lymphocyte profiles, their differentiation factors, and characteristic cytokine profiles.

The Treg cell population consists of Th3 T CD4+ cells and regulatory T cells (Tr1). Th3 CD4+ cells are characterized by their ability to express primarily TGF-β, whereas Tr1 lymphocytes are characterized by high expression of IL-10 (188–193).

Tr1 lymphocytes are a subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes, whose function is to suppress immune responses and maintain self-tolerance (7, 189). Although other types of T cells with suppressor activities have been described, Tr1 lymphocytes are characterized by CD4+, FoxP3+, and CD25+ markers (189). These cells are produced primarily through the recognition of autoantigens in the thymus or of external antigens in peripheral lymphoid organs, in which these cells do not express FoxP3 constitutively but acquire the function of Tr1 cells by increasing FoxP3 expression in response to the presence of IL-2 and TGF-β, or stimulated by the presence of small molecules such as retinoic acid (188, 189). The production of some Tr1 cells requires the cytokine TGF-β, and the maintenance and effectiveness of this profile is dependent on IL-2 (190). Tr1 cells suppress immune responses at multiple stages of their life cycle, and appear to be capable of inhibiting B cell activation, as well as differentiation and proliferation of NK cells (191). Several mechanisms of action have been proposed for Tr1 cells, including the production of immunosuppressive cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10 (191). Another mechanism involves the inhibition of T cell stimulation by APCs via the binding of CTLA-4 (CD152)—a Tr1 cell surface molecule—to B7 (CD80/CD86), which is expressed on the surface of APCs. This ultimately increases IL-2 cytokine consumption through an increase in IL-2 receptor expression on Tr1 cells (7).

In normal, noninflamed skin, Treg lymphocytes are preferentially distributed close to and in close association with hair follicles, with fewer cells located in the dermis between these structures (196, 197). In general, because of the role of Treg cells in the control of skin immune responses, the biological and functional characterization of these cells in the cutaneous tissue environment is of vital importance for the understanding of inflammatory diseases of the skin (198–200). Because of their close relationship with hair follicles, these structures play a key role in the control of skin homeostasis and in the activation of Treg cells (197, 201–203). Dysregulation of follicle stem cell function has been shown to be linked to Treg cell function, and studies of polymorphisms have linked this to high-affinity IL-2α receptor genes (IL-2RA and CD25), FOXP3, and cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte–associated antigen (CTLA), among others (197, 202, 203). These aspects are confirmed by the observation of the presence of Treg lymphocytes in lesions of alopecia areata undergoing regeneration after institution of specific therapeutic treatments. In addition to the cellular components of the hair follicles, other cell types, including fibroblasts, DCs and LCs, also play important roles in controlling the Treg lymphocyte population of the skin (196, 197).

Th17 cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of both psoriasis and atopic dermatitis and are a key cell type in the body’s first line of defense against infection by certain fungi and bacteria (40, 183, 204, 205). Studies have pointed to important roles of IL-17 and IL-22, including increasing the expression of keratinocyte antimicrobial peptides (38). Therefore, Th17 lymphocytes may form a bridge between immune cells and epithelial cells, thus improving the efficiency of the skin’s immune responses to pathogens (Fig. 4 and Table 1) (199, 200).

Th22 cells constitute another recently identified subgroup of T cells that express IL-22 but not IL-17 or IFN-γ (180). pDCs are able to induce the Th22 profile by releasing TNF-α and IL-6. These cells were identified in cultures from patients with atopic dermatitis, and the authors of several other studies have investigated the role of this profile in the skin under normal and pathological conditions, including psoriasis, lupus erythematosus, lymphoma, allergic and infectious diseases, epidermal skin immunity, and tissue remodeling (Fig. 4 and Table 1) (180, 206–212).

Th9 and Th25 lymphocytes have also been described recently. Th9 lymphocytes are distinguished by the expression of IL-4, IL-9, IL-10, IL-21, and TGF-β and differentiate from Th0 lymphocytes in the presence of IL-4 and TGF-β (213–215). In the skin, Th9 cells appear to be involved in autocrine and paracrine control of local inflammatory responses and in Candida albicans infections. In addition to stimulating IL-9 expression, these cells also induce the release of TNF-α and granzyme B (216, 217). Th25 lymphocytes are characterized by the expression of Act1, IL-4, IL-13, and IL-25 (IL-17E) and are involved in IgE release and mast cell degranulation. Recent data have implicated Th25 in the immunopathogenesis of skin diseases, namely, coccidioidomycosis, chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, and lepromatous leprosy (Fig. 4 and Table 1) (178, 218–222).

γδ T lymphocytes are so-called nonconventional immune cells (223, 224). These cells have receptors composed of γ and δ heterodimers that are homologous to the α and β chains of TCRs found in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, and they are identified through the CD3 and TCγδ markers (Table 1). γδ T lymphocytes do not recognize peptide antigens associated with MHC-II and are not restricted to the MHC. γδ T lymphocytes recognize alkyl amines, small phosphorylated molecules, lipids not commonly found in mycobacteria and other microorganisms (presented by nonclassical molecules such as MHC class I glycoproteins), and protein and nonprotein antigens that do not require any kind of processing by APCs (223–227). In human skin, γδ T lymphocytes constitute a small percentage of T cells in the dermis and epidermis (2 to 9% and 1 to 10%, respectively) (170, 171, 228). Little is known about their roles in human skin, but an increase in the population of γδ T lymphocytes has been observed in patients with melanoma, LC histiocytosis, leishmaniasis, and leprosy, among other disorders, suggesting their involvement in the pathogenesis of these skin diseases (Table 1) (229–234).

Endothelial CellsEndothelial cells play key roles in controlling the flow of immune cells from blood to tissue through the expression of various adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemokines, which serve as chemoattractants for leukocyte migration (Table 1) (235, 236). The endothelium is one of the first lines of defense against harmful and infectious agents in blood, and it directly affects innate and adaptive immune responses (236). During the initial phase of inflammation, when the innate response is more apparent, endothelial cells activate TLR proteins (mainly TLR2 and TLR4), which mediate immune responses (236). TLR2 is a crucial agent in the inflammatory response against bacteria and other pathogens, whereas TLR4 is a strong regulator of the innate and adaptive immune responses (Table 1) (236–239). However, these molecules are present at low levels before the activation of endothelial cells, and activation of the endothelial system leads to elevated expression of TLRs. In addition to providing standard receptors for TLR2 and TLR4, the endothelium is responsible for interacting with mediators from the immunoglobulin family such as ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (240–242). Other adhesins, such as E- and P-selectins, are also present in greater quantities during the inflammatory response and are mainly mediated by cytokine stimuli (243). Such adhesin molecules are constitutively expressed in the membranes of endothelial cells, but when the levels of proinflammatory agents increase, they induce elevated expression of adhesins (240–242). This leads to greater interaction between blood leukocytes and their endothelial ligands, which involves these cells in the cascade that leads to rolling, firm adhesion, and diapedesis (Table 1) (236, 243).

In inflammation, endothelial cells are directly influenced by several factors that facilitate the formation of inflammatory infiltrate (243, 244). The mechanisms responsible for this alteration include oxidative stress, which results from immune responses and increases the expression of adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1, ICAM-2, and selectins CD62E and CD62P. However, the cytokines of the immune system act as direct agents in mediating oxidative stress and influence leukocyte adhesion (243).

The endothelial immune response is associated with increased expression of cytokines such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1α, and IL-1β, which increase the expression of adhesion molecules (243, 244). IFN-γ appears to be one of the most important factors inducing MHC class II expression and is an important agent in the formation of costimulatory molecules, including adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1 and E-selectin (245). TNF-α leads to the increased expression of molecules such as VCAM-1 and ICAM-1. Depending on the phenotype and the intensity of the inflammatory stimuli, it is possible to detect various adhesion molecules in the membranes of endothelial cells (Table 1) (246). Such molecules modify the processes of cell rolling and tissue transmigration in leukocytes. Cell transmigration through the endothelium is possible only following rupture of the endothelial wall, which is mainly mediated by cell changes induced by proinflammatory cytokines (246–248). A cascade of intracellular events leads to changes in the cytoskeleton which allow the extravasation of fluid, chemical mediators, and cells toward the cytokine source. This process results in the formation of perivascular edema and directly combats microbial agents at the site of infection (Fig. 5) (215).

FIG 5
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5

Integrated view of the association between the host cells and infectious agents in the context of the skin’s in situ immune response. Note that the triggered mechanisms culminate in the activation of professional and nonprofessional immune cells, such as keratinocytes, which can, however, interfere with the immune response cascade against various harmful agents. These cells act as a mechanical barrier and can interfere with the immune response in the skin. Endothelial activation is required for the migration of immune cells from the blood to the tissue.

Other Cellular Components of the SkinOther cells are also part of this complex organization of the skin, and although they may not act as the first line of host defense, they cooperate with the immune system during immune responses (249–253). The key function of fibroblasts is the production of structural proteins that constitute cutaneous tissue. They also coordinate with immune responses, allowing the migration of blood cells to sites of injury, and interact with other local cells, thereby potentiating the signaling cascade of host responses to infectious agents (254–257). Fibroblasts are relatively abundant cells in skin, and more recent work has shown that these cells release a chemoattractant that is sensed by dermal lymphocytes. In addition, fibroblasts possibly play an important role in attracting and maintaining Treg cells in this environment (258–260). The authors of several studies have discussed the importance of the extracellular matrix of the skin in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases and have characterized the importance of these tissue components in the evolution of infections (261). Moreover, similar to keratinocytes, fibroblasts can produce cytokines such as TGF-β and FGF-β, among others, and thus may influence the local immune response pattern (261–264).

Cutaneous appendages are of fundamental importance in maintaining the physiological homeostasis of the skin. Hairs are keratinized structures formed by invagination of the epidermis in the dermis (265). A terminal dilatation is observed in the process of hair follicle growth—the hair bulb—and, in its central portion, a dermal papilla that induces hair growth (249–253). The cells that cover the papilla and form the root of the hair include keratinocytes and melanocytes. During the differentiation process of keratinocytes, which occurs in the hair root, they undergo keratinization and incorporate melanin. Hair follicles of human skin are specialized structures that may also be involved in the control of local immune responses in the skin. Activation of stem cells from hair follicles may be involved in the hair growth process and in the control of immune responses, through interaction with Treg lymphocytes, as described previously (197, 201–203).

Sebaceous glands, as with hair follicles, originate from the same epithelial sheath and secrete cholesterol and triglycerides (252, 253, 266, 267). These glands can express TLR2 and TLR4 and secrete immune factors such as defensins, cytokines, chemokines, adipokines, serpin E1, leptin, and resistin, which can act as a bridge between the control of the local inflammatory response and lipid metabolism in the skin (266). This ability to control the tissue immune response pattern of sebaceous glands in close association with lipid metabolism makes these glands fundamental to control of the local microbiome. Consequently, the deregulation of their physiology is linked to the pathophysiology of infectious, metabolic, and inflammatory skin diseases, such as acne, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, and rosacea (266–271). The eccrine sweat glands are entangled tubular structures and comprise cells that eliminate the secreted product, without compromising the cells. They produce sweat, which is directly secreted onto the skin surface through an excretory duct and is composed of an aqueous solution of ions (Na2+, K+, and Cl−), urea, ammonia, uric acid, and very small amounts of protein (253). The apocrine sweat glands are found in the axillary, pubic, and perianal regions. Part of the cytoplasm of the cells that constitute these glands is lost during secretion. The apocrine sweat glands produce a viscous secretion that is discharged into the hair follicle canal, rather than directly onto the surface of the skin (252, 253).

Finally, neurons, which primarily act on the somesthetic processes of the skin, interact with lymphocytes and regulate local immune responses (254, 272, 273). Riol-Blanco et al. have shown a close relationship between DDs and skin nociceptors, as these nerve endings probably induce the production of IL-23 and IL-17, which, in turn, function to control immune responses of the skin in experimental models of psoriasiform inflammation (272).

THE ROLE OF CELL DEATH IN HOMEOSTASIS AND THE CONTROL OF THE SKIN’S IMMUNE RESPONSE

The phenomenon of cell death is intrinsically linked to the cellular life cycle and aging, and it occurs as a homeostatic mechanism under both physiological and pathological conditions (274–279). Cells in general may die by two distinct mechanisms, namely, accidental cell death and regulated cell death (RCD) (274). RCD may occur in contexts that include exogenous or endogenous cellular alteration or disturbance, leading to physiological changes that cannot be reverted, and consequently lead to cell death. It may also occur in the absence of exogenous disorders and, as in this specific case, in the context of programmed cell death (PCD) during the process of cell development and renewal (274, 275). Classical studies have divided the mechanism of cell death into three types: type I cell death or apoptosis, type II cell death or autophagy, and type III cell death or necrosis, based primarily on the morphological characteristics of each of these groups (274).

Since 2005, a committee on cell death has formulated the guidelines of a classification system for the different types of cell death, based not only on morphological aspects but also on genetic, biochemical, pharmacological, and functional characteristics. This has resulted in a wider classification for the mechanisms of cell death and has furthered our understanding of the importance of these mechanisms for processes involving homeostasis and disease. This classification scheme proposes the occurrence of at least 12 distinct mechanisms of cell death, which are shown in Table 2 (274, 275).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Types of cell death and causes, morphology, mechanisms, or factors that lead to its induction

In the skin, although cell death is related to important physiological and pathological processes, evidence suggests that it also has a prominent role in the control of immunological responses and in the pathophysiology of various skin diseases. Necrosis and apoptosis appear to be at opposite ends of a spectrum, and several mechanisms lead to cell death (257, 262, 280–282). Mechanisms such as necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, and autophagy have received increased attention in the study of the pathophysiology of various infectious and noninfectious diseases, including in the cutaneous environment (Table 2) (257, 262, 280–287).

There are many and diverse processes by which infectious agents interact with host cells to induce injury (284). Often, these agents trigger a process that culminates in immunosuppression. Among these mechanisms, apoptosis is commonly used by diverse infectious agents to negatively control immune responses by inducing cell death in inflammatory cells (280–287). The high-affinity recognition of autoantigens by T lymphocytes (when these are constantly stimulated by antigens) can lead to apoptosis (280, 288–297). There are two major apoptotic pathways, and both involve the deletion of peripheral and mature immune cells. Cell death by apoptosis may present mitochondrial changes, which are regulated by the Bcl-2 family of proteins; this family has pro- and antiapoptotic members (284). Changes in the permeability of the outer membranes of mitochondria may be induced by Bcl-2 proteins, or these proteins may interact with a caspase activation inhibitor (280). The extrinsic pathway occurs by activation of death receptors and is the second most important apoptosis activation route in the deletion of immune cells. Death receptors, which are homologous to TNF receptors, may be activated by TNF-like ligands, leading to the oligomerization of an adapter protein (280, 284). This protein activates a caspase cascade or induces the translocation of a proapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family to the mitochondria, leading to a change in their permeability and to the activation of a caspase (280, 284–287).

Some studies have suggested the occurrence of apoptosis in the control of the immune response in lepromatous leprosy and cutaneous leishmaniasis, as well as in several viral diseases (298–301). Lytic, caseous, or liquefactive necrosis can occur in inflammatory or infectious skin diseases as a consequence of the action of viruses, bacteria, or helminths (302). Moreover, the innate immune response pattern may underlie the occurrence of cell death by pyroptosis, implying that this type of cell death is important in innate immune responses to infectious or noninfectious skin agents (255, 303).

Necroptosis is a type of necrotic cell death that involves fine control of plasma membrane permeability, and it is activated by the formation of RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL complexes (necrosomes), which activate a pronecroptotic protein termed MLKL (285, 304). After this phase, the propagation of cell death by the release of DAMPs, with activation of cellular immune responses, takes place, leading primarily to the activation of macrophages, DCs, and NK cells (305), inducing the pinocytosis of compromised or infected cells. This leads to the activation of a cascade of cell death where the presence of TNF-α may also contribute to the induction of chronic inflammation and to the presence of more lesions (305, 306). Some infections have been associated with cell death by necroptosis, as reported for infectious processes induced by a suspension of Staphylococcus aureus diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and inoculated into mice in experimental models of infections (169, 284, 307, 308).

Cellular autophagy occurs through the accumulation of autophagosomes in the cellular cytoplasm, with the degradation and recycling of cellular components that may have been damaged by aging, chemical agents, infections, or inflammation (257, 262, 309, 310). Experiments on the interaction between Zika virus and skin cells have shown that infected fibroblasts form autophagosomes in the cytoplasm, suggesting that during viral replication, autophagy is stimulated in cutaneous cells (311–313).

Characterized by the occurrence of lipid peroxidation products and ROS release from iron metabolism, ferroptosis is a type of RCD with morphological characteristics such as diminished mitochondria and condensation of mitochondrial membranes that induces reduction in numbers of cristae and the rupture of the outer mitochondrial membrane (314–327). Ferroptosis can be induced in keratinocytes, mainly in processes related to DNA or mitochondrial damage mediated by ROS or nitrogen radicals, as well as by potentially toxic chemical compounds, which can be produced in abundance in the presence of infectious diseases (265, 326, 327). These compounds can cause injury and induce cell death by diverse mechanisms, including apoptosis, necroptosis, and ferroptosis, depending on the activity of xenobiotic biochemical pathways involving glutathione and vitamins C and E (314–327). The types of cell death and their relation to infectious and noninfectious causes, as well as their stimuli, mechanisms, and morphology, are shown in Tables 2 and 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Mechanisms of cell death in the skin and their relationship with various infectious agents and chemical inducers of irreversible cell damagea

OVERVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SKIN IMMUNE SYSTEM AND THE EVOLUTION OF INFECTIOUS CUTANEOUS DISEASES

I have already discussed the general organization of the cutaneous immune system, so in the present section I specifically address the mechanisms inherent in compartmentalized responses to infectious agents of diverse nature, with emphasis on local skin immune responses, tissue immune responses, or in situ immune responses.

The in situ pattern of the skin’s response to infections is complex and involves several cellular and humoral factors (Table 1 and Fig. 5). The immune response to various infectious agents in the tissue environment requires the activation of innate and acquired types of immunity, which are closely linked and interregulated (Fig. 5) (328–332). Infectious agents of diverse nature can reach the skin tissue either through direct inoculation at a break in the physical barrier of the epidermis or through blood vessels and activation of the endothelium (5, 333, 334). In the latter context, endothelial cells play an important role in the migration of microorganisms from blood to the cutaneous environment, as well as in the migration of leukocytes to the focus of infection (335). It should be emphasized that endotheliocytes allow the transmigration of cells from the blood into the infected tissue in order to elicit a specific immune response during the course of an infection (Fig. 5) (336–338). It has already been shown that the endothelial phenotype can influence the evolution of chronic and spectral infectious diseases such as leprosy and leishmaniasis, depending on the pattern of cells that migrate to the focus of infection (336–338). Furthermore, the capillaries of the dermis maintain a close anatomical relationship with the DDs and probably participate, together with endotheliocytes, in the first stages of the immune response to infectious agents of the skin (Fig. 5) (339–342). Although LCs are the main type of immune cells in the epidermis, as already mentioned, keratinocytes can participate in the control of the immune response in the tissue microenvironment (343). They do so by releasing antimicrobial peptides, presenting antigens, or participating in innate or adaptive immunity by releasing cytokines that control the cascade of proteins in the immune response to microorganisms (Fig. 5) (343). The first cytokine identified as being released by keratinocytes was IL-1. Subsequently, other cytokines were identified: IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, and TGF-β (38–41, 344). Keratinocytes are also able to express MHC-I and MHC-II and participate in the immunopathogenesis of various infectious viral, bacterial, and protozoal diseases, including leishmaniasis, leprosy, and herpes (Fig. 5) (38–41). In infections with flaviviruses such as Zika virus, West Nile virus (WNV), and dengue virus, keratinocytes possibly play key roles in the early stages of immune responses, which are mediated by IFN-β, IFN-γ, and antimicrobial peptides (345).

DCs contribute to the development of an effective and specific adaptive immune response against infectious agents through the processing and presentation of antigens (13, 61–64). Several studies have demonstrated the importance of this group of cells in specific immune responses to bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses in the skin tissue environment (89). These studies have indicated the importance of antigen presentation by DCs in the evolution of infectious diseases such as leprosy, leishmaniasis, paracoccidioidomycosis, lacaziosis, and infections with flaviviruses such as dengue and Zika viruses (89, 313). In several arthropod-borne infections, the interaction of infectious agents with the dermal immune system, in particular with LCs and adjacent keratinocytes, represents the first stage of interaction with the host and one of the determining factors in the clinical evolution of disease, as well as in maintaining transmissibility cycles (345). Several mosquitoes responsible for transmitting infectious agents produce saliva with substances that generally exhibit anticoagulant, angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory properties, inhibiting local T cell proliferation and suppressing the expression of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-2, and IFN-γ, as well as stimulating the secretion of IL-4 and IL-10, both in the tissue environment and in experimental models (345).

In the process of local immune responses of skin to agents transmitted by arthropods, LCs have the ability to capture the inoculated antigens and migrate to the satellite lymph nodes, where they initiate the process of activation of T cells (345). In dengue virus infection, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses have demonstrated the presence of virus antigens in LCs, whose activation is mainly dependent on TNF-α and to a lesser extent on IL-1-β, contrary to what is observed in WNV, where the activation and migration of LCs are more dependent on IL-1-β than on TNF-α (345–348). In Zika virus diseases, some studies have demonstrated an induction of IFN-β expression by LCs (345). In another study developed by Vielle et al. (349), Zika virus infection was shown to be capable of inducing the expression of type I and II interferons in DC culture, and it was shown that the activation of these cells is mediated by the expression of MHC class II, CD40, CD80/86, or CCR7. Some data have pointed to the importance of DCs in the sexual transmission of infectious agents via mucosal surfaces through the interaction of these agents with the various subpopulations of DCs, including LCs, through the immunomodulation of the activity of these cells, a fact that is well described for the transmission of HIV and is important in the mechanisms of sexual transmission of Zika virus (350, 351). In leishmaniasis and malaria, this ability to modulate the skin can either contribute to the elimination of these microorganisms or create an environment that stimulates the evolution of the disease into milder or more severe clinical forms (344, 352–354). This particular aspect can be observed in the clinical evolution of dengue fever and in its relationship with the phenomenon of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) (355). Dengue virus infection can be caused by four serotypes (dengue virus serotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4) and may result in a spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from mild to hemorrhagic symptoms. Moreover, the pattern of this symptomatology is linked immune responses by the host (355–357). ADE is a process linked to the clinical evolution of severe forms of dengue and occurs in individuals with a history of secondary infection by a virus with a heterologous serotype. ADE triggers the activation of nonneutralizing or subneutralizing antibodies and specific previously sensitized cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which can stimulate a marked cross-immune reaction, contributing to the development of severe forms of infection. Studies have demonstrated the role of DCs in this mechanism (355–357). During ADE, mature DCs require the expression of Fc gamma receptor IIa (Fc RIIa), and the process is inversely related to the high expression levels of DC-SIGN (DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin) receptor present in immature DCs (355, 356). DCs stimulate the increased expression of viral proteins as well as the production of cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, which are involved in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon (355).

In cutaneous leishmaniasis and leprosy, populations of dendritic cells in the hyperergic and tuberculoid forms are more frequent than in the anergic and lepromatous forms, indicating a fundamental role for the number of DCs in cutaneous lesions in inducing effective cellular immune responses against intracellular infectious pathogens during the evolution of spectral cutaneous diseases (340, 352). These findings have been further corroborated by results obtained with other cell types such as macrophages, which are important in the presentation of antigens and in microbicidal action against M. leprae and leishmaniasis (358, 359).

The roles of inflammasomes in immunity to infectious agents have been characterized for some skin diseases, such as leprosy, paracoccidioidomycosis, and leishmaniasis (91, 95, 98, 359, 360). The pattern of immune responses is associated with the creation of a marked proinflammatory environment and is also involved in the induction of cell death by pyroptosis, which is related to cell deletion and induction of tissue injury in the inflammatory processes of infectious diseases (255, 303).

Macrophages play important roles in the recognition and elimination of foreign antigens of infectious or noninfectious origin, as well as in cicatrization and in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix (Fig. 3 and 5) (264, 358, 359). In infectious diseases, macrophages are the main cells involved in immunity to infection by M. leprae, Leishmania, Paracoccidioides, and Lacazia loboi and are probably involved in antigen presentation and in the release of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) with microbicidal effects (361, 362). The microbicidal mechanism employed by macrophages is closely related to gene expression patterns such as natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs) with regard to the efficiency of the immune response to mycobacteria, such as M. tuberculosis and M. leprae (361).

Mast cells are abundant in the intestinal mucosa and skin. Owing to their preferential location, they play a role as sentinels against microbial agents (bacteria, viruses, helminths, and fungi), triggering local inflammatory responses (132–134). Moreover, along with basophils, mast cells can affect vessels by releasing vasoactive substances that influence the flow of leukocytes between blood and tissue. They may also be associated with the action of IgE during the in situ immune response against infections of the skin (133, 134).

The development of an effective adaptive immune response to infectious skin agents is closely related to the clinical evolution of several diseases, such as leishmaniasis, paracoccidioidomycosis, and leprosy (363–366). The Th1 × Th2 paradigm has been associated with the clinical evolution of several infectious diseases, and studies on leishmaniasis and leprosy have also characterized this process (Fig. 5) (179, 364). In these two diseases, predominance of the expression of Th1 cytokines, such as TNF-α and IFN-γ, is clinically related to more localized forms of lesions, whereas predominance of the expression of Th2 cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-10, contributes to the clinical evolution of susceptible or anergic forms (Fig. 5) (363–366), with the presence of lesions in greater quantity and more diffusely distributed in the patient’s body. However, the role of recently identified immunological agents in the immune response of the skin has provided a better understanding of the evolution of these and other infectious diseases, as well as of the processes of healing and tissue remodeling (179, 362, 367). Among these new agents and cytokine profiles, Treg cells and Th9, Th17, Th22, and Th25 profile cytokines have provided us with additional data regarding the immunopathogenesis of skin infections and, above all, on complex and spectrally evolving infectious diseases (179, 363–366). For example, cytokines belonging to the Th17 profile, such as IL-6 and IL-17, probably contribute to a response mediated by a more exacerbated and efficient inflammatory profile against intracellular pathogens such as M. leprae and Leishmania (179, 368). In contrast, cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β effectively maintain a state of susceptibility to infection. They accomplish this either by inhibiting Th1 profile cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, or by contributing to the differentiation of lymphocytes into Treg cells, which also negatively control immune responses (179, 369).

The Th22 profile, characterized by cytokines IL-22, IL-13, and TNF-α, in addition to fibroblast growth factor β (FGF-β), has contributed to the understanding of the complex immunopathogenesis of infections with agents such as M. leprae (180, 336). IL-22 has been implicated as an antimicrobial response cytokine because it interferes with the phagolysosomal maturation process, thereby inhibiting the lytic capacity of macrophages against M. tuberculosis. The increased participation of this cytokine in lepromatous leprosy seems to play a potentiating role in the lytic activity of macrophages, in a possible attempt to revert the susceptibility of this clinical form of the infection (180, 336). Similarly, IL-13 plays a key role in the induction of the humoral response, which is consequently ineffective in the recognition and elimination of intracellular infectious agents (336). Finally, FGF-β is probably involved in tissue regeneration associated with more aggressive infectious diseases and with increased tissue involvement. In addition to participating in the functions of Th22 lymphocytes, FGF-β (along with TGF-β) may help create a regenerative environment in lepromatous leprosy (336). Finally, the importance of Th17 profile cytokines, such as IL-17 and IL-22, should be noted, because they are capable of potentiating the release of AMPs by keratinocytes and mucosal cells. This confers on these cytokines an important role in both innate and adaptive immunity (38–41).

The role of profiles such as Th9 and Th25 in infectious and noninfectious skin inflammatory diseases has not yet been extensively studied and characterized. The few available articles in the literature have indicated the proinflammatory role of Th9 lymphocytes in tuberculoid leprosy. In particular, they have focused on cytokine IL-9, or on anti-inflammatory profiles such as that observed for Th25 lymphocytes, whose cytokine IL-25 (IL-17E) is related to humoral immune responses and is therefore ineffective against intracellular infectious agents. IL-25 belongs to the IL-17 family, and unlike other members of this family such as IL-17A and IL-17F, it inhibits Th1 and Th17 cytokine production (178, 213, 218, 220, 369–372). NF-κB activation is induced by IL-25 and triggers the expression of IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and immunoglobulin E, as well as the degranulation of mast cells against extracellular pathogens (218).

Several studies have demonstrated the interactions between pathogen and host with regard to various types of infectious agents that have immune escape mechanisms (373, 374). In this scenario, pathogen and host factors may interact to maintain the environment. Studies have shown that factors such as TGF-β and the apoptosis phenomenon may contribute to this process (375, 376). Data collected during the evolution of certain infectious skin diseases suggest that this control is affected by apoptosis. TGF-β, which is a strong inducer of apoptosis, also seems to have a fundamental role in the process. It contributes to the differentiation of the Treg response, inhibits macrophagic responses, and acts as an immunosuppressive cytokine (301, 375–377). Moreover, TGF-β seems to play a major role in the evolution of several infectious diseases of the skin, including leprosy, lacaziosis, cutaneous leishmaniasis, and chromoblastomycosis (96, 359, 375, 376, 378–380). Depending on its relationship with other cytokines and humoral factors of the host’s response, TGF-β has numerous roles in the tissue microenvironment. It has multiple functions and can control the immune response by direct action on the cells of the immune system, inhibiting the effector activity of lymphocytes and macrophages, and by inducing the apoptosis of macrophages (375). Apoptosis has been implicated in the negative control of the immune response because certain infectious pathogens use it as an escape mechanism (301, 375–377, 381–384). In both leprosy and cutaneous leishmaniasis, apoptosis has been identified as the most frequent mechanism of cell death in the lepromatous forms of leprosy and anergic leishmaniasis, which has implicated this phenomenon in a possible mechanism of control of the immune response in these clinical conditions (300, 301, 381–384). In addition, it is worth mentioning that other types of cell death, such as pyroptosis and autophagy, have been implicated in skin tissue responses in viral infections and in the activation of inflammasomes that induce pyroptosis in bacterial infections. This further indicates a possible role of these mechanisms of cell death in the pathogenesis and immunopathogenesis of such infections (Tables 2 and 3) (385–389).

PERSPECTIVES

Finally, it is worth remembering that the skin immune system is complex and acts in very characteristic ways against microbial agents. Moreover, many other factors might be involved in effective immune responses. The identification of new subpopulations of lymphocytes and macrophages and the characterization of other cells that may influence immune responses or act as immunogenic targets are important topics of research. Such research will certainly contribute to the elucidation of the complex mechanisms of skin immune responses and of the evolution of cutaneous diseases. Research concerning the initial stages of systemic infectious diseases with clinical courses that depend on the initial interaction between pathogen and host in the skin, such as in Zika and dengue virus infections, will also be beneficial.

The immune response to various infectious agents in the skin triggers a wide range of defense mechanisms. Nevertheless, this response is sufficiently specific to fulfill its primary role: to act as an interface between host and the environment. In recent years, an increasingly important role has been attributed to the cutaneous immune system because it is in this environment that the mechanisms of immune responses to various infectious agents begin. It is very likely that a series of immune cascades determines the host response pattern according to this first interaction. From this perspective, special emphasis has been placed on DCs, which are components of innate immunity and the first subpopulation to interact with infectious agents that enter the body through epithelia such as skin and mucous membranes. This subpopulation is also the link to the mechanisms of adaptive immunity and determines the pattern of responses to be developed against these specific agents. Recently identified mechanisms and immunological factors involved in the control of immune responses have also attracted attention in recent years, opening up promising research into both cutaneous and general immunity.

Important research topics include the role of inflammasomes in the control of local immune responses, the characterization of endoplasmic reticulum stress mechanisms in the effectiveness of the responses by DCs and macrophages, the emergence of the roles of keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and melanocytes in the control of the immune response, and the role of endotheliocytes in the flux of immune cells into the skin. The characterization of this tissue environment will lead to a better understanding of the relationship between the host and the environment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Juarez A. S. Quaresma is a Research Productivity Fellow and Senior Postdoctoral Fellow at the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq/Brazil (grant numbers 302553/2015-0 and 116427/2016-7).

I declare that I have no competing interests.

  • Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Engwerda CR,
    2. Kaye PM
    . 2000. Organ-specific immune responses associated with infectious disease. Immunol Today 21:73–78. doi:10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01549-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Quaresma JAS,
    2. Sotto MN,
    3. Balato A
    . 2017. Inflammatory and immune-mediated cutaneous diseases. Mediators Inflamm 2017:6793968. doi:10.1155/2017/6793968.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gasque P,
    2. Jaffar-Bandjee MC
    . 2015. The immunology and inflammatory responses of human melanocytes in infectious diseases. J Infect 71:413–421. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Handfield C,
    2. Kwock J,
    3. MacLeod AS
    . 2018. Innate antiviral immunity in the skin. Trends Immunol 39:328–340. doi:10.1016/j.it.2018.02.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Byrd AL,
    2. Belkaid Y,
    3. Segre JA
    . 2018. The human skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 16:143–155. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Egawa G,
    2. Kabashima K
    . 2018. Barrier dysfunction in the skin allergy. Allergol Int 67:3–11. doi:10.1016/j.alit.2017.10.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ali N,
    2. Rosenblum MD
    . 2017. Regulatory T cells in skin. Immunology 152:372–381. doi:10.1111/imm.12791.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Elias PM,
    2. Wakefield JS
    . 2014. Mechanisms of abnormal lamellar body secretion and the dysfunctional skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134:781–791. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.048.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schmitt D
    . 1994. Cutaneous immune system. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 188:207–221.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lapins J,
    2. Gaines H,
    3. Lindbäck S,
    4. Lidbrink P,
    5. Emtestam L
    . 1997. Skin and mucosal characteristics of symptomatic primary HIV-1 infection. AIDS Patient Care STDS 11:67–70. doi:10.1089/apc.1997.11.67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Owen JL,
    2. Mohamadzadeh M
    . 2013. Microbial activation of gut dendritic cells and the control of mucosal immunity. J Interferon Cytokine Res 33:619–631. doi:10.1089/jir.2013.0046.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Debeer S,
    2. Le Luduec JB,
    3. Kaiserlian D,
    4. Laurent P,
    5. Nicolas JF,
    6. Dubois B,
    7. Kanitakis J
    . 2013. Comparative histology and immunohistochemistry of porcine versus human skin. Eur J Dermatol 23:456–466. doi:10.1684/ejd.2013.2060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nestle FO,
    2. Di Meglio P,
    3. Qin JZ,
    4. Nickoloff BJ
    . 2009. Skin immune sentinels in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:679–691. doi:10.1038/nri2622.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ono S,
    2. Kabashima K
    . 2016. The role of dendritic cells and macrophages in the skin immunity. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi 39:448–454. doi:10.2177/jsci.39.448.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Tay SS,
    2. Roediger B,
    3. Tong PL,
    4. Tikoo S,
    5. Weninger W
    . 2014. The skin-resident immune network. Curr Dermatol Rep 3:13–22. doi:10.1007/s13671-013-0063-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yousef H,
    2. Badri T
    . 2018. Histology, skin appendages. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Alegría-Landa V,
    2. Cerroni L,
    3. Kutzner H,
    4. Requena L
    . 2017. Paraprotein deposits in the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 77:1145–1158. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.07.039.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Smith EH,
    2. Chan MP
    . 2017. Inflammatory dermatopathology for general surgical pathologists. Clin Lab Med 37:673–696. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2017.05.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    1. Abdayem R,
    2. Haftek M
    . 2018. The epidermal barrier. Ann Dermatol Venereol 145:293–301. doi:10.1016/j.annder.2017.12.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    1. Prinz JC
    . 2017. Melanocytes: target cells of an HLA-C*06:02-restricted autoimmune response in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 137:2053–2058. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Boniface K,
    2. Taïeb A,
    3. Seneschal J
    . 2016. New insights into immune mechanisms of vitiligo. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 151:44–54.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Tremante E,
    2. Ginebri A,
    3. Lo Monaco E,
    4. Benassi B,
    5. Frascione P,
    6. Grammatico P,
    7. Cappellacci S,
    8. Catricalà C,
    9. Arcelli D,
    10. Natali PG,
    11. Di Filippo F,
    12. Mottolese M,
    13. Visca P,
    14. Benevolo M,
    15. Giacomini P
    . 2014. A melanoma immune response signature including human leukocyte antigen-E. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 27:103–112. doi:10.1111/pcmr.12164.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Tsao H,
    2. Fukunaga-Kalabis M,
    3. Herlyn M
    . 2017. Recent advances in melanoma and melanocyte biology. J InvestDermatol 137:557–560. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Feller L,
    2. Chandran R,
    3. Kramer B,
    4. Khammissa RA,
    5. Altini M,
    6. Lemmer J
    . 2014. Melanocyte biology and function with reference to oral melanin hyperpigmentation in HIV-seropositive subjects. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 30:837–843. doi:10.1089/AID.2014.0062.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Burgeson RE,
    2. Christiano AM
    . 1997. The dermal-epidermal junction. Curr Opin Cell Biol 9:651–658. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80118-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Jakubowicz K
    . 1969. Role of keratinocytes in the process of keratinization. Przegl Dermatol 56:795–800.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Elbe A,
    2. Stingl G
    . 1995. Dendritic cells as stimulator cells of MHC class I-restricted immune responses. Adv Exp Med Biol 378:341–345. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1971-3_76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Gieryńska M,
    2. Schollenberger A,
    3. Cespedes IS,
    4. Pawlak E
    . 2009. Dendritic epidermal T cells: sentinels of the skin. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) 63:114–122.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Lai Y,
    2. Gallo RL
    . 2008. Toll-like receptors in skin infections and inflammatory diseases. Infect Disord Drug Targets 8:144–155. doi:10.2174/1871526510808030144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Newton K,
    2. Dixit VM
    . 2012. Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a006049. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006049.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Shisler JL
    . 2015. Immune evasion strategies of molluscum contagiosum virus. Adv Virus Res 92:201–252. doi:10.1016/bs.aivir.2014.11.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ulland TK,
    2. Ferguson PJ,
    3. Sutterwala FS
    . 2015. Evasion of inflammasome activation by microbial pathogens. J Clin Invest 125:469–477. doi:10.1172/JCI75254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Coll RC,
    2. Robertson AA,
    3. Chae JJ,
    4. Higgins SC,
    5. Muñoz-Planillo R,
    6. Inserra MC,
    7. Vetter I,
    8. Dungan LS,
    9. Monks BG,
    10. Stutz A,
    11. Croker DE,
    12. Butler MS,
    13. Haneklaus M,
    14. Sutton CE,
    15. Núñez G,
    16. Latz E,
    17. Kastner DL,
    18. Mills KH,
    19. Masters SL,
    20. Schroder K,
    21. Cooper MA,
    22. O’Neill LA
    . 2015. A small-molecule inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Nat Med 21:248–255. doi:10.1038/nm.3806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Feldmeyer L,
    2. Keller M,
    3. Niklaus G,
    4. Hohl D,
    5. Werner S,
    6. Beer HD
    . 2007. The inflammasome mediates UVB-induced activation and secretion of interleukin-1beta by keratinocytes. Curr Biol 17:1140–1145. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.074.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Watanabe H,
    2. Gaide O,
    3. Pétrilli V,
    4. Martinon F,
    5. Contassot E,
    6. Roques S,
    7. Kummer JA,
    8. Tschopp J,
    9. French LE
    . 2007. Activation of the IL-1beta-processing inflammasome is involved in contact hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol 127:1956–1963. doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700819.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Keller M,
    2. Ruegg A,
    3. Werner S,
    4. Beer HD
    . 2008. Active caspase-1 is a regulator of unconventional protein secretion. Cell 132:818–831. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.040.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Gilliet M,
    2. Lande R
    . 2008. Antimicrobial peptides and self-DNA in autoimmune skin inflammation. Curr Opin Immunol 20:401–407. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2008.06.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Liang SC,
    2. Tan XY,
    3. Luxenberg DP,
    4. Karim R,
    5. Dunussi-Joannopoulos K,
    6. Collins M,
    7. Fouser LA
    . 2006. Interleukin (IL)-22 and IL-17 are coexpressed by Th17 cells and cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides. J Exp Med 203:2271–2279. doi:10.1084/jem.20061308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Harder J,
    2. Bartels J,
    3. Christophers E,
    4. Schröder JM
    . 1997. A peptide antibiotic from human skin. Nature 387:861. doi:10.1038/43088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Weaver CT,
    2. Hatton RD,
    3. Mangan PR,
    4. Harrington LE
    . 2007. IL-17 family cytokines and the expanding diversity of effector T cell lineages. Annu Rev Immunol 25:821–852. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kolls JK,
    2. McCray PB, Jr,
    3. Chan YR
    . 2008. Cytokine-mediated regulation of antimicrobial proteins. Nat Rev Immunol 8:829–835. doi:10.1038/nri2433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Schütze S,
    2. Machleidt T,
    3. Krönke M
    . 1992. Mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor action. Semin Oncol 19:16–24.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Arend WP,
    2. Palmer G,
    3. Gabay C
    . 2008. IL-1, IL-18, and IL-33 families of cytokines. Immunol Rev 223:20–38. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00624.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Albanesi C,
    2. Scarponi C,
    3. Giustizieri ML,
    4. Girolomoni G
    . 2005. Keratinocytes in inflammatory skin diseases. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 4:329–334. doi:10.2174/1568010054022033.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Dieu-Nosjean MC,
    2. Massacrier C,
    3. Homey B,
    4. Vanbervliet B,
    5. Pin JJ,
    6. Vicari A,
    7. Lebecque S,
    8. Dezutter-Dambuyant C,
    9. Schmitt D,
    10. Zlotnik A,
    11. Caux C
    . 2000. Macrophage inflammatory protein 3 alpha is expressed at inflamed epithelial surfaces and is the most potent chemokine known in attracting Langerhans cell precursors. J Exp Med 192:705–718. doi:10.1084/jem.192.5.705.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Nickoloff BJ,
    2. Turka LA
    . 1994. Immunological functions of non-professional antigen-presenting cells: new insights from studies of T-cell interactions with keratinocytes. Immunol Today 15:464–469. doi:10.1016/0167-5699(94)90190-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Black AP,
    2. Ardern-Jones MR,
    3. Kasprowicz V,
    4. Bowness P,
    5. Jones L,
    6. Bailey AS,
    7. Ogg GS
    . 2007. Human keratinocyte induction of rapid effector function in antigen-specific memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol 37:1485–1493. doi:10.1002/eji.200636915.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Kupper TS
    . 1990. The activated keratinocyte: a model for inducible cytokine production by non-bone marrow-derived cells in cutaneous inflammatory and immune responses. J Invest Dermatol 94:146–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Luger TA,
    2. Schwarz T
    . 1990. Evidence for an epidermal cytokine network. J Invest Dermatol 95:100–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Barker JN,
    2. Mitra RS,
    3. Griffiths CE,
    4. Dixit VM,
    5. Nickoloff BJ
    . 1991. Keratinocytes as initiators of inflammation. Lancet 337:211–214. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)92168-2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Bitschar K,
    2. Wolz C,
    3. Krismer B,
    4. Peschel A,
    5. Schittek B
    . 2017. Keratinocytes as sensors and central players in the immune defense against Staphylococcus aureus in the skin. J Dermatol Sci 87:215–220. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.06.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. 52.↵
    1. Moody C
    . 2017. Mechanisms by which HPV induces a replication competent environment in differentiating keratinocytes. Viruses 19:9.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Sylvestre DL,
    2. Disston AR,
    3. Bui DP
    . 2003. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease associated with interferon alpha-2b/ribavirin combination therapy. J Viral Hepat 10:467–470. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2893.2003.00456.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Natarajan VT,
    2. Ganju P,
    3. Singh A,
    4. Vijayan V,
    5. Kirty K,
    6. Yadav S,
    7. Puntambekar S,
    8. Bajaj S,
    9. Dani PP,
    10. Kar HK,
    11. Gadgil CJ,
    12. Natarajan K,
    13. Rani R,
    14. Gokhale RS
    . 2014. IFN-γ signaling maintains skin pigmentation homeostasis through regulation of melanosome maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:2301–2306. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304988111.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Bertolotti A,
    2. Boniface K,
    3. Vergier B,
    4. Mossalayi D,
    5. Taieb A,
    6. Ezzedine K,
    7. Seneschal J
    . 2014. Type I interferon signature in the initiation of the immune response in vitiligo. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 27:398–407. doi:10.1111/pcmr.12219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Otsuka M,
    2. Egawa G,
    3. Kabashima K
    . 2018. Uncovering the mysteries of Langerhans cells, inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells, and monocyte-derived Langerhans cell-like cells in the epidermis. Front Immunol 9:1768. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01768.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    1. Clayton K,
    2. Vallejo AF,
    3. Davies J,
    4. Sirvent S,
    5. Polak ME
    . 2017. Langerhans cells—programmed by the epidermis. Front Immunol 8:1676. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01676.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. 58.↵
    1. Worbs T,
    2. Hammerschmidt SI,
    3. Förster R
    . 2017. Dendritic cell migration in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 17:30–48. doi:10.1038/nri.2016.116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Doebel T,
    2. Voisin B,
    3. Nagao K
    . 2017. Langerhans cells—the macrophage in dendritic cell clothing. Trends Immunol 38:817–828. doi:10.1016/j.it.2017.06.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Ono S,
    2. Kabashima K
    . 2015. Novel insights into the role of immune cells in skin and inducible skin-associated lymphoid tissue (iSALT). Allergo J Int 24:170–179. doi:10.1007/s40629-015-0065-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.↵
    1. Bursch LS,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Igyarto B,
    4. Kissenpfennig A,
    5. Malissen B,
    6. Kaplan DH,
    7. Hogquist KA
    . 2007. Identification of a novel population of Langerin+ dendritic cells. J Exp Med 204:3147–3156. doi:10.1084/jem.20071966.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Ginhoux F,
    2. Collin MP,
    3. Bogunovic M,
    4. Abel M,
    5. Leboeuf M,
    6. Helft J,
    7. Ochando J,
    8. Kissenpfennig A,
    9. Malissen B,
    10. Grisotto M,
    11. Snoeck H,
    12. Randolph G,
    13. Merad M
    . 2007. Blood-derived dermal langerin+ dendritic cells survey the skin in the steady state. J Exp Med 204:3133–3146. doi:10.1084/jem.20071733.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Poulin LF,
    2. Henri S,
    3. de Bovis B,
    4. Devilard E,
    5. Kissenpfennig A,
    6. Malissen B
    . 2007. The dermis contains langerin+ dendritic cells that develop and function independently of epidermal Langerhans cells. J Exp Med 204:3119–3131. doi:10.1084/jem.20071724.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Nagao K,
    2. Ginhoux F,
    3. Leitner WW,
    4. Motegi S,
    5. Bennett CL,
    6. Clausen BE,
    7. Merad M,
    8. Udey MC
    . 2009. Murine epidermal Langerhans cells and langerin-expressing dermal dendritic cells are unrelated and exhibit distinct functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:3312–3317. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807126106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 65.↵
    1. Collin M,
    2. Bigley V
    . 2016. Monocyte, macrophage, and dendritic cell development: the human perspective. Microbiol Spectr 4:MCHD-0015-2015. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0015-2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Malissen B,
    2. Tamoutounour S,
    3. Henri S
    . 2014. The origins and functions of dendritic cells and macrophages in the skin. Nat Rev Immunol 14:417–428. doi:10.1038/nri3683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Klechevsky E
    . 2015. Functional diversity of human dendritic cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 850:43–54. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15774-0_4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Serbina NV,
    2. Salazar-Mather TP,
    3. Biron CA,
    4. Kuziel WA,
    5. Pamer EG
    . 2003. TNF/iNOS-producing dendritic cells mediate innate immune defense against bacterial infection. Immunity 19:59–70. doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00171-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 69.↵
    1. Lowes MA,
    2. Chamian F,
    3. Abello MV,
    4. Fuentes-Duculan J,
    5. Lin SL,
    6. Nussbaum R,
    7. Novitskaya I,
    8. Carbonaro H,
    9. Cardinale I,
    10. Kikuchi T,
    11. Gilleaudeau P,
    12. Sullivan-Whalen M,
    13. Wittkowski KM,
    14. Papp K,
    15. Garovoy M,
    16. Dummer W,
    17. Steinman RM,
    18. Krueger JG
    . 2005. Increase in TNF-alpha and inducible nitric oxide synthase-expressing dendritic cells in psoriasis and reduction with efalizumab (anti-CD11a). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:19057–19062. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509736102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Bedoui S,
    2. Greyer M
    . 2014. The role of dendritic cells in immunity against primary herpes simplex virus infections. Front Microbiol 5:533. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00533.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. 71.↵
    1. Baliwag J,
    2. Barnes DH,
    3. Johnston A
    . 2015. Cytokines in psoriasis. Cytokine 73:342–350. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2014.12.014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    1. Iwasaki Y,
    2. Fujio K,
    3. Okamura T,
    4. Yamamoto K
    . 2015. Interleukin-27 in T cell immunity. Int J Mol Sci 16:2851–2863. doi:10.3390/ijms16022851.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. 73.↵
    1. Romani N,
    2. Ebner S,
    3. Tripp CH,
    4. Flacher V,
    5. Koch F,
    6. Stoitzner P
    . 2006. Epidermal Langerhans cells—changing views on their function in vivo. Immunol Lett 106:119–125. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2006.05.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.↵
    1. Hoyo E,
    2. Kanitakis J,
    3. Schmitt D
    . 1993. The dermal dendrocyte. Pathol Biol (Paris) 41:613–618.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Silverman JS,
    2. Tamsen A
    . 1998. CD34 and factor XIIIa-positive microvascular dendritic cells and the family of fibrohistiocytic mesenchymal tumors. Am J Dermatopathol 20:533–536. doi:10.1097/00000372-199810000-00022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Quatresooz P,
    2. Paquet P,
    3. Hermanns-Lê T,
    4. Piérard GE
    . 2008. Molecular mapping of factor XIIIa-enriched dendrocytes in the skin. Int J Mol Med 22:403–409.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Hunger RE,
    2. Sieling PA,
    3. Ochoa MT,
    4. Sugaya M,
    5. Burdick AE,
    6. Rea TH,
    7. Brennan PJ,
    8. Belisle JT,
    9. Blauvelt A,
    10. Porcelli SA,
    11. Modlin RL
    . 2004. Langerhans cells utilize CD1a and langerin to efficiently present nonpeptide antigens to T cells. J Clin Invest 113:701–708. doi:10.1172/JCI19655.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.↵
    1. Igyártó BZ,
    2. Kaplan DH
    . 2013. Antigen presentation by Langerhans cells. Curr Opin Immunol 25:115–119. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2012.11.007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Blanco P,
    2. Palucka AK,
    3. Gill M,
    4. Pascual V,
    5. Banchereau J
    . 2001. Induction of dendritic cell differentiation by IFN-alpha in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 294:1540–1543. doi:10.1126/science.1064890.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. 80.↵
    1. Segura E,
    2. Amigorena S
    . 2014. Inflammatory dendritic cells. Med Sci (Paris) 30:64–68. doi:10.1051/medsci/20143001015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. 81.↵
    1. Boyman O,
    2. Conrad C,
    3. Dudli C,
    4. Kielhorn E,
    5. Nickoloff BJ,
    6. Nestle FO
    . 2005. Activation of dendritic antigen-presenting cells expressing common heat shock protein receptor CD91 during induction of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 152:1211–1218. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06701.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    1. Angel CE,
    2. Lala A,
    3. Chen CJ,
    4. Edgar SG,
    5. Ostrovsky LL,
    6. Dunbar PR
    . 2007. CD14+ antigen-presenting cells in human dermis are less mature than their CD1a+ counterparts. Int Immunol 19:1271–1279. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxm096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. 83.↵
    1. Podojil JR,
    2. Miller SD
    . 2013. Targeting the B7 family of co-stimulatory molecules: successes and challenges. BioDrugs 27:1–13. doi:10.1007/s40259-012-0001-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  84. 84.↵
    1. Agata Y,
    2. Kawasaki A,
    3. Nishimura H,
    4. Ishida Y,
    5. Tsubata T,
    6. Yagita H,
    7. Honjo T
    . 1996. Expression of the PD-1 antigen on the surface of stimulated mouse T and B lymphocytes. Int Immunol 8:765–772. doi:10.1093/intimm/8.5.765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  85. 85.↵
    1. Baecher-Allan C,
    2. Brown JA,
    3. Freeman GJ,
    4. Hafler DA
    . 2003. CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells from human peripheral blood express very high levels of CD25 ex vivo. Novartis Found Symp 252:106–114.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.↵
    1. Keir ME,
    2. Butte MJ,
    3. Freeman GJ,
    4. Sharpe AH
    . 2008. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 26:677–704. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090331.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. 87.↵
    1. Riella LV,
    2. Paterson AM,
    3. Sharpe AH,
    4. Chandraker A
    . 2012. Role of the PD-1 pathway in the immune response. Am J Transplant 12:2575–2587. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04224.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. 88.↵
    1. Murphy K,
    2. Weaver C
    . 2016. Janeway’s immunobiology, 9th ed, p 161. Garland Science, New York, NY.
  89. 89.↵
    1. Peron G,
    2. de Lima Thomaz L,
    3. Camargo da Rosa L,
    4. Thomé R,
    5. Cardoso Verinaud LM
    . 2018. Modulation of dendritic cell by pathogen antigens: where do we stand? Immunol Lett 196:91–102. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2018.02.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  90. 90.↵
    1. Qian C,
    2. Cao X
    . 2018. Dendritic cells in the regulation of immunity and inflammation. Semin Immunol 35:3–11. doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.12.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. 91.↵
    1. Zhong Y,
    2. Kinio A,
    3. Saleh M
    . 2013. Functions of NOD-like receptors in human diseases. Front Immunol 4:333. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. 92.↵
    1. Tsuchiya K,
    2. Hara H
    . 2014. The inflammasome and its regulation. Crit Rev Immunol 34:41–80. doi:10.1615/CritRevImmunol.2013008686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. 93.↵
    1. Kim JO,
    2. Jo E
    . 2013. NLRP3 inflammasome and host protection against bacterial infection. J Korean Med Sci 28:1415–1423. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.↵
    1. Yurdakul P
    . 2005. Immunopathogenesis of Leishmania infections. Mikrobiyol Bul 39:363–381.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    1. Lima-Junior DS,
    2. Costa DL,
    3. Carregaro V,
    4. Cunha LD,
    5. Silva AL,
    6. Mineo TW,
    7. Gutierrez FR,
    8. Bellio M,
    9. Bortoluci KR,
    10. Flavell RA,
    11. Bozza MT,
    12. Silva JS,
    13. Zamboni DS
    . 2013. Inflammasome-derived IL-1β production induces nitric oxide-mediated resistance to Leishmania. Nat Med 19:909–915. doi:10.1038/nm.3221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. 96.↵
    1. Maspi N,
    2. Abdoli A,
    3. Ghaffarifar F
    . 2016. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in cutaneous leishmaniasis: a review. Pathog Glob Health 110:247–260. doi:10.1080/20477724.2016.1232042.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. 97.↵
    1. Gurung P,
    2. Kanneganti TD
    . 2016. Immune responses against protozoan parasites: a focus on the emerging role of Nod-like receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:3035–3051. doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2212-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  98. 98.↵
    1. Clay GM,
    2. Sutterwala FS,
    3. Wilson ME
    . 2014. NLR proteins and parasitic disease. Immunol Res 59:142–152. doi:10.1007/s12026-014-8544-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  99. 99.↵
    1. Lima-Junior DS,
    2. Mineo TWP,
    3. Calich VLG,
    4. Zamboni DS
    . 2017. Dectin-1 activation during Leishmania amazonensis phagocytosis prompts syk-dependent reactive oxygen species production to trigger inflammasome assembly and restriction of parasite replication. J Immunol 199:2055–2068. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  100. 100.↵
    1. Gupta AK,
    2. Ghosh K,
    3. Palit S,
    4. Barua J,
    5. Das PK,
    6. Ukil A
    . 2017. Leishmania donovani inhibits inflammasome-dependent macrophage activation by exploiting the negative regulatory proteins A20 and UCP2. FASEB J 31:5087–5101. doi:10.1096/fj.201700407R.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. 101.↵
    1. Zamboni DS,
    2. Lima-Junior DS
    . 2015. Inflammasomes in host response to protozoan parasites. Immunol Rev 265:156–171. doi:10.1111/imr.12291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. 102.↵
    1. Gringhuis SI,
    2. Wevers BA,
    3. Kaptein TM,
    4. van Capel TM,
    5. Theelen B,
    6. Boekhout T,
    7. de Jong EC,
    8. Geijtenbeek TB
    . 2011. Selective C-Rel activation via malt1 controls anti-fungal T(H)-17 immunity by dectin-1 and dectin-2. PLoS Pathog 7:e1001259. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. 103.↵
    1. Garcia VE,
    2. Uyemura K,
    3. Sieling PA,
    4. Ochoa MT,
    5. Morita CT,
    6. Okamura H,
    7. Kurimoto M,
    8. Rea TH,
    9. Modlin RL
    . 1999. IL-18 promotes type 1 cytokine production from NK cells V and T cells in human intracellular infection. J Immunol 162:6114–6121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. 104.↵
    1. Costa RD,
    2. Mendonça VA,
    3. Lyon S,
    4. Penido RA,
    5. Costa A,
    6. Costa MD,
    7. Nishi MP,
    8. Teixeira MM,
    9. Teixeira AL,
    10. Antunes C
    . 2008. Avaliação da expressão de interleucina 1 beta (IL-1β) e antagonista do receptor de interleucina1 (IL-1Ra) em pacientes com hanseníase. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 41:99–103. doi:10.1590/S0037-86822008000700020.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    1. Sinsimer D,
    2. Fallows D,
    3. Peixoto B,
    4. Krahenbuhl J,
    5. Kaplan G,
    6. Manca C
    . 2010. Mycobacterium leprae actively modulates the cytokine response in naïve human monocytes. Infect Immun 78:293–300. doi:10.1128/IAI.00816-09.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  106. 106.↵
    1. Kang TJ,
    2. Lee GS,
    3. Kim SK,
    4. Jin SH,
    5. Chae GT
    . 2010. Comparison of two mice strains, A/J and C57BL/6, in caspase-1 activity and IL-1β secretion of macrophage to Mycobacterium leprae infection. Med Inflamm 2010:1. doi:10.1155/2010/708713.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. 107.↵
    1. Marzano AV,
    2. Borghi A,
    3. Wallach D,
    4. Cugno M
    . 2018. A comprehensive review of neutrophilic diseases. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 54:114–130. doi:10.1007/s12016-017-8621-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  108. 108.↵
    1. Chiricozzi A,
    2. Romanelli P,
    3. Olpe E,
    4. Borsellino G,
    5. Romanelli M
    . 2018. Scanning the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci 19:179. doi:10.3390/ijms19010179.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  109. 109.↵
    1. Taylor PR,
    2. Roy S,
    3. Leal SM,
    4. Sun Y,
    5. Howell SJ,
    6. Cobb BA,
    7. Li X,
    8. Pearlman E
    . 2014. Activation of neutrophils by autocrine IL-17-IL-17RC interactions during fungal infection is regulated by IL-6, IL-23, RORγt and dectin-2. Nat Immunol 15:143–151. doi:10.1038/ni.2797.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. 110.↵
    1. Tamarozzi F,
    2. Wright HL,
    3. Thomas HB,
    4. Edwards SW,
    5. Taylor MJ
    . 2014. A lack of confirmation with alternative assays questions the validity of IL-17 expression in human neutrophils using immunohistochemistry. Immunol Lett 162:194–198. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2014.10.025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    1. Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque SDC,
    2. Pessoa-E-Silva R,
    3. Trajano-Silva LAM,
    4. de Goes TC,
    5. de Morais RCS,
    6. Oliveira CNDC,
    7. de Lorena VMB,
    8. de Paiva-Cavalcanti M
    . 2017. The equivocal role of Th17 cells and neutrophils on immunopathogenesis of leishmaniasis. Front Immunol 8:1437. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01437.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  112. 112.↵
    1. Murray PJ,
    2. Wynn TA
    . 2011. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 11:723–737. doi:10.1038/nri3073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. 113.↵
    1. Chow A,
    2. Brown BD,
    3. Merad M
    . 2011. Studying the mononuclear phagocyte system in the molecular age. Nat Rev Immunol 11:788–798. doi:10.1038/nri3087.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. 114.↵
    1. Gordon S
    . 2003. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 3:23–35. doi:10.1038/nri978.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  115. 115.↵
    1. Broichhausen C,
    2. Riquelme P,
    3. Geissler EK,
    4. Hutchinson JA
    . 2012. Regulatory macrophages as therapeutic targets and therapeutic agents in solid organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 17:332–342. doi:10.1097/MOT.0b013e328355a979.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. 116.↵
    1. Hristodorov D,
    2. Mladenov R,
    3. Huhn M,
    4. Barth S,
    5. Thepen T
    . 2012. Macrophage-targeted therapy: CD64-based immunotoxins for treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. Toxins (Basel) 4:676–694. doi:10.3390/toxins4090676.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  117. 117.↵
    1. Konttinen YT,
    2. Pajarinen J,
    3. Takakubo Y,
    4. Gallo J,
    5. Nich C,
    6. Takagi M,
    7. Goodman SB
    . 2014. Macrophage polarization and activation in response to implant debris: influence by “particle disease” and “ion disease”. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 24:267–281. doi:10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2014011355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. 118.↵
    1. Erbel C,
    2. Wolf A,
    3. Lasitschka F,
    4. Linden F,
    5. Domschke G,
    6. Akhavanpoor M,
    7. Doesch AO,
    8. Katus HA,
    9. Gleissner CA
    . 2015. Prevalence of M4 macrophages within human coronary atherosclerotic plaques is associated with features of plaque instability. Int J Cardiol 186:219–225. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. 119.↵
    1. Lawrence T,
    2. Natoli G
    . 2011. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: enabling diversity with identity. Nat Rev Immunol 11:750–761. doi:10.1038/nri3088.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. 120.↵
    1. Shi C,
    2. Pamer EG
    . 2011. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 11:762–774. doi:10.1038/nri3070.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. 121.↵
    1. Wynn TA,
    2. Chawla A,
    3. Pollard JW
    . 2013. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature 496:445–455. doi:10.1038/nature12034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  122. 122.↵
    1. London A,
    2. Cohen M,
    3. Schwartz M
    . 2013. Microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages: functionally distinct populations that act in concert in CNS plasticity and repair. Front Cell Neurosci 7:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. 123.↵
    1. Galain CL,
    2. Olleros ML,
    3. Vesin D,
    4. Garcia I
    . 2015. Much more than M1 and M2 macrophages, there are also CD169+ and TCR+ macrophages. Front Immunol 6:263. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. 124.↵
    1. Paoli F,
    2. Staels B,
    3. Chinetti-Gbaguidi G
    . 2014. Macrophage phenotypes and their modulation in atherosclerosis. Circ J 78:1775–1781. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. 125.↵
    1. Colin S,
    2. Chinetti-Gbaguidi G,
    3. Staels B
    . 2014. Macrophage phenotypes in atherosclerosis. Immunol Rev 262:153–166. doi:10.1111/imr.12218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. 126.↵
    1. Rabhi S,
    2. Rabhi I,
    3. Trentin B,
    4. Piquemal D,
    5. Regnault B,
    6. Goyard S,
    7. Lang T,
    8. Descoteaux A,
    9. Enninga J,
    10. Guizani-Tabbane L
    . 2016. Lipid droplet formation, their localization and dynamics during Leishmania major macrophage infection. PLoS One 11:e0148640. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148640.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  127. 127.↵
    1. Nogueira PM,
    2. Assis RR,
    3. Torrecilhas AC,
    4. Saraiva EM,
    5. Pessoa NL,
    6. Campos MA,
    7. Marialva EF,
    8. Ríos-Velasquez CM,
    9. Pessoa FA,
    10. Secundino NF,
    11. Rugani JN,
    12. Nieves E,
    13. Turco SJ,
    14. Melo MN,
    15. Soares RP
    . 2016. Lipophosphoglycans from Leishmania amazonensis strains display immunomodulatory properties via TLR4 and do not affect sand fly infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10:e0004848. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. 128.↵
    1. Sousa JR,
    2. Lucena Neto FD,
    3. Sotto MN,
    4. Quaresma J
    . 2018. Immunohistochemical characterization of the M4 macrophage population in leprosy skin lesions. BMC Infect Dis 18:576. doi:10.1186/s12879-018-3478-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  129. 129.↵
    1. Mattos KA,
    2. Oliveira VC,
    3. Berrêdo-Pinho M,
    4. Amaral JJ,
    5. Antunes LC,
    6. Melo RC,
    7. Acosta CC,
    8. Moura DF,
    9. Olmo R,
    10. Han J,
    11. Rosa PS,
    12. Almeida PE,
    13. Finlay BB,
    14. Borchers CH,
    15. Sarno EN,
    16. Bozza PT,
    17. Atella GC,
    18. Pessolani MC
    . 2014. Mycobacterium leprae intracellular survival relies on cholesterol accumulation in infected macrophages: a potential target for new drugs for leprosy treatment. Cell Microbiol 16:797–815. doi:10.1111/cmi.12279.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  130. 130.↵
    1. Elamin AA,
    2. Stehr M,
    3. Singh M
    . 2012. Lipid droplets and Mycobacterium leprae infection. J Pathog 2012:361374. doi:10.1155/2012/361374.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. 131.↵
    1. Abraham SN,
    2. Arock M
    . 1998. Mast cells and basophils in innate immunity. Semin Immunol 10:373–381. doi:10.1006/smim.1998.0140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  132. 132.↵
    1. Kabashima K,
    2. Nakashima C,
    3. Nonomura Y,
    4. Otsuka A,
    5. Cardamone C,
    6. Parente R,
    7. De Feo G,
    8. Triggiani M
    . 2018. Biomarkers for evaluation of mast cell and basophil activation. Immunol Rev 282:114–120. doi:10.1111/imr.12639.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  133. 133.↵
    1. Yu R,
    2. Igawa K,
    3. Handa Y,
    4. Munetsugu T,
    5. Satoh T,
    6. Yokozeki H
    . 2017. Basophils and mast cells are crucial for reactions due to epicutaneous sensitization to ovalbumin. Exp Dermatol 26:778–784. doi:10.1111/exd.13279.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  134. 134.↵
    1. Iki M,
    2. Tanaka K,
    3. Deki H,
    4. Fujimaki M,
    5. Sato S,
    6. Yoshikawa S,
    7. Yamanishi Y,
    8. Karasuyama H
    . 2016. Basophil tryptase mMCP-11 plays a crucial role in IgE-mediated, delayed-onset allergic inflammation in mice. Blood 128:2909–2918. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-07-729392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  135. 135.↵
    1. Bagher M,
    2. Larsson-Callerfelt AK,
    3. Rosmark O,
    4. Hallgren O,
    5. Bjermer L,
    6. Westergren-Thorsson G
    . 2018. Mast cells and mast cell tryptase enhance migration of human lung fibroblasts through protease-activated receptor 2. Cell Commun Signal 16:59. doi:10.1186/s12964-018-0269-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  136. 136.↵
    1. Chirumbolo S,
    2. Bjørklund G,
    3. Vella A
    . 2018. Mast cell activation test versus basophil activation test and related competing issues. J Allergy Clin Immunol 142:1018–1019. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.06.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  137. 137.↵
    1. Xie G,
    2. Wang F,
    3. Peng X,
    4. Liang Y,
    5. Yang H,
    6. Li L
    . 2018. Modulation of mast cell Toll-like receptor 3 expression and cytokines release by histamine. Cell Physiol Biochem 46:2401–2411. doi:10.1159/000489646.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  138. 138.↵
    1. Choi JE,
    2. Di Nardo A
    . 2018. Skin neurogenic inflammation. Semin Immunopathol 40:249–259. doi:10.1007/s00281-018-0675-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  139. 139.↵
    1. Van Linthout S,
    2. Miteva K,
    3. Tschöpe C
    . 2014. Crosstalk between fibroblasts and inflammatory cells. Cardiovasc Res 102:258–269. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvu062.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  140. 140.↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Hwang BJ,
    3. Culton DA,
    4. Li N,
    5. Burette S,
    6. Koller BH,
    7. Messingham KA,
    8. Fairley JA,
    9. Lee JJ,
    10. Hall RP,
    11. An L,
    12. Diaz LA,
    13. Liu Z
    . 2017. Eosinophils mediate tissue injury in autoimmune skin disease bullous pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol 12:S0022-202X(17)33250-5.
    OpenUrl
  141. 141.↵
    1. Freire PC,
    2. Muñoz CH,
    3. Stingl G
    . 2017. IgE autoreactivity in bullous pemphigoid: eosinophils and mast cells as major targets of pathogenic immune reactants. Br J Dermatol 177:1644–1653. doi:10.1111/bjd.15924.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  142. 142.↵
    1. Ohtsu H,
    2. Seike M
    . 2017. Histamine and histamine receptors in allergic dermatitis. Handb Exp Pharmacol 241:333–345. doi:10.1007/164_2016_9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  143. 143.↵
    1. Venturelli N,
    2. Lexmond WS,
    3. Ohsaki A,
    4. Nurko S,
    5. Karasuyama H,
    6. Fiebiger E,
    7. Oyoshi MK
    . 2016. Allergic skin sensitization promotes eosinophilic esophagitis through the IL-33-basophil axis in mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 138:1367–1380. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.02.034.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  144. 144.↵
    1. Graauw E,
    2. Beltraminelli H,
    3. Simon HU,
    4. Simon D
    . 2015. Eosinophilia in dermatologic disorders. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 35:545–560. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2015.05.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  145. 145.↵
    1. Long H,
    2. Zhang G,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Lu Q
    . 2016. Eosinophilic skin diseases: a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 50:189–213. doi:10.1007/s12016-015-8485-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  146. 146.↵
    1. Cook PC,
    2. Aynsley SA,
    3. Turner JD,
    4. Jenkins GR,
    5. Van Rooijen N,
    6. Leeto M,
    7. Brombacher F,
    8. Mountford AP
    . 2011. Multiple helminth infection of the skin causes lymphocyte hypo-responsiveness mediated by Th2 conditioning of dermal myeloid cells. PLoS Pathog 7:e1001323. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. 147.↵
    1. Pearlman E
    . 1997. Immunopathology of onchocerciasis: a role for eosinophils in onchocercal dermatitis and keratitis. Chem Immunol 66:26–40. doi:10.1159/000058664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  148. 148.↵
    1. Prendergast CT,
    2. Sanin DE,
    3. Mountford AP
    . 2016. CD4 T-cell hyporesponsiveness induced by schistosome larvae is not dependent upon eosinophils but may involve connective tissue mast cells. Parasite Immunol 38:81–92. doi:10.1111/pim.12300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  149. 149.↵
    1. Kumar S
    . 2018. Natural killer cell cytotoxicity and its regulation by inhibitory receptors. Immunology 154:383–393. doi:10.1111/imm.12921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. 150.↵
    1. Kurioka A,
    2. Klenerman P,
    3. Willberg C
    . 2018. Innate-like CD8+ T cells and NK cells: converging functions and phenotypes. Immunology 14. doi:10.1111/imm.12925.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  151. 151.↵
    1. Kumar A,
    2. Suryadevara N,
    3. Hill TM,
    4. Bezbradica JS,
    5. Van Kaer L,
    6. Joyce S
    . 2017. Natural killer T cell an ecological evolutionary developmental biology perspective. Front Immunol 8:1858. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01858.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  152. 152.↵
    1. Peng H,
    2. Tian Z
    . 2017. Natural killer cell memory: progress and implications. Front Immunol 8:1143. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01143.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  153. 153.↵
    1. Rusek P,
    2. Wala M,
    3. Druszczyńska M,
    4. Fol M
    . 2018. Infectious agents as stimuli of trained innate immunity. Int J Mol Sci 19:456. doi:10.3390/ijms19020456.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  154. 154.↵
    1. Bourgeois E,
    2. Van LP,
    3. Samson M,
    4. Diem S,
    5. Barra A,
    6. Roga S,
    7. Gombert JM,
    8. Schneider E,
    9. Dy M,
    10. Gourdy P,
    11. Girard JP,
    12. Herbelin A
    . 2009. The pro-Th2 cytokine IL-33 directly interacts with invariant NKT and NK cells to induce IFN-gamma production. Eur J Immunol 39:1046–1055. doi:10.1002/eji.200838575.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  155. 155.↵
    1. Yachie A,
    2. Kanegane H,
    3. Kasahara Y
    . 2003. Epstein-Barr virus-associated T-natural killer cell lymphoproliferative diseases. Semin Hematol 40:124–132. doi:10.1053/shem.2003.50012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  156. 156.↵
    1. Haustein UF
    . 1989. Bacterial skin flora, host defense and skin infections. Dermatol Monatsschr 175:665–680.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  157. 157.↵
    1. Reinhold U,
    2. Bauer R
    . 1988. Clinico-immunological analysis of the significance of natural killer cells in skin diseases. Hautarzt 39:129–135.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  158. 158.↵
    1. Cupedo T,
    2. Crellin NK,
    3. Papazian N,
    4. Rombouts EJ,
    5. Weijer K,
    6. Grogan JL,
    7. Fibbe WE,
    8. Cornelissen JJ,
    9. Spits H
    . 2009. Human fetal lymphoid tissue inducer cells are interleukin 17 producing precursors to RORC+ CD127+ natural killer-like cells. Nat Immunol 10:66–74. doi:10.1038/ni.1668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  159. 159.↵
    1. Teunissen MBM,
    2. Munneke JM,
    3. Bernink JH,
    4. Spuls PI,
    5. Res PCM,
    6. Te Velde A,
    7. Cheuk S,
    8. Brouwer MWD,
    9. Menting SP,
    10. Eidsmo L,
    11. Spits H,
    12. Hazenberg MD,
    13. Mjösberg J
    . 2014. Composition of innate lymphoid cell subsets in the human skin: enrichment of NCR(+) ILC3 in lesional skin and blood of psoriasis patients. J Invest Dermatol 134:2351–2360. doi:10.1038/jid.2014.146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  160. 160.↵
    1. Monticelli LA,
    2. Sonnenberg GF,
    3. Abt MC,
    4. Alenghat T,
    5. Ziegler CGK,
    6. Doering TA,
    7. Angelosanto JM,
    8. Laidlaw BJ,
    9. Yang CY,
    10. Sathaliyawala T,
    11. Kubota M,
    12. Turner D,
    13. Diamond JM,
    14. Goldrath AW,
    15. Farber DL,
    16. Collman RG,
    17. Wherry EJ,
    18. Artis D
    . 2011. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung-tissue homeostasis after infection with influenza virus. Nat Immunol 12:1045–1054. doi:10.1038/ni.2131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  161. 161.↵
    1. Villanova F,
    2. Flutter B,
    3. Tosi I,
    4. Grys K,
    5. Sreeneebus H,
    6. Perera GK,
    7. Chapman A,
    8. Smith CH,
    9. Di Meglio P,
    10. Nestle FO
    . 2014. Characterization of innate lymphoid cells in human skin and blood demonstrates increase of NKp44+ ILC3 in psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 134:984–991. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  162. 162.↵
    1. Laffleur B,
    2. Debeaupuis O,
    3. Dalloul Z,
    4. Cogné M
    . 2017. B cell intrinsic mechanisms constraining IgE memory. Front Immunol 8:1277. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01277.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  163. 163.↵
    1. Rodríguez-Pinto D
    . 2005. B cells as antigen presenting cells. Cell Immunol 238:67–75. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2006.02.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  164. 164.↵
    1. Nihal M,
    2. Mikkola D,
    3. Wood GS
    . 2000. Detection of clonally restricted immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangements in normal and lesional skin: analysis of the B cell component of the skin-associated lymphoid tissue and implications for the molecular diagnosis of cutaneous B cell lymphomas. J Mol Diagn 2:5–10. doi:10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60609-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  165. 165.↵
    1. Shimizu Y,
    2. Newman W,
    3. Tanaka Y,
    4. Shaw S
    . 1992. Lymphocyte interactions with endothelial cells. Immunol Today 13:106–112. doi:10.1016/0167-5699(92)90151-V.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  166. 166.↵
    1. Geherin SA,
    2. Fintushel SR,
    3. Lee MH,
    4. Wilson RP,
    5. Patel RT,
    6. Alt C,
    7. Young AJ,
    8. Hay JB,
    9. Debes GF
    . 2012. The skin, a novel niche for recirculating B cells. J Immunol 188:6027–6035. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1102639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  167. 167.↵
    1. Lafyatis R,
    2. Kissin E,
    3. York M,
    4. Farina G,
    5. Viger K,
    6. Fritzler MJ,
    7. Merkel PA,
    8. Simms RW
    . 2009. B cell depletion with rituximab in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 60:578–583. doi:10.1002/art.24249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  168. 168.↵
    1. Simon D,
    2. Hösli S,
    3. Kostylina G,
    4. Yawalkar N,
    5. Simon HU
    . 2008. Anti-CD20 (rituximab) treatment improves atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121:122–128. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.11.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  169. 169.↵
    1. Holtfreter S,
    2. Kolata J,
    3. Broker BM
    . 2010. Towards the immune proteome of Staphylococcus aureus—the anti-S. aureus antibody response. Int J Med Microbiol 300:176–192. doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.10.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  170. 170.↵
    1. Kobayashi SD,
    2. Deleo FR
    . 2011. A MRSA-terious enemy among us: boosting MRSA vaccines. Nat Med 17:168–169. doi:10.1038/nm0211-168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  171. 171.↵
    1. Berthelot JM,
    2. Jamin C,
    3. Amrouche K,
    4. Le Goff B,
    5. Maugars Y,
    6. Youinou P
    . 2013. Regulatory B cells play a key role in immune system balance. Joint Bone Spine 80:18–22. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.04.010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  172. 172.↵
    1. Aravena O,
    2. Ferrier A,
    3. Menon M,
    4. Mauri C,
    5. Aguillón JC,
    6. Soto L,
    7. Catalán D
    . 2017. TIM-1 defines a human regulatory B cell population that is altered in frequency and function in systemic sclerosis patients. Arthritis Res Ther 19:8. doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1213-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  173. 173.↵
    1. Clark RA,
    2. Chong B,
    3. Mirchandani N,
    4. Brinster NK,
    5. Yamanaka K,
    6. Dowgiert RK,
    7. Kupper TS
    . 2006. The vast majority of CLA+ T cells are resident in normal skin. J Immunol 176:4431–4439. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4431.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  174. 174.↵
    1. Andrew W,
    2. Andrew NV
    . 1949. Lymphocytes in the normal epidermis of the rat and of man. Anat Rec 104:217–241. doi:10.1002/ar.1091040207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  175. 175.↵
    1. Bos JD,
    2. Kapsenberg ML
    . 1993. The skin immune system: progress in cutaneous biology. Immunol Today 14:75–78. doi:10.1016/0167-5699(93)90062-P.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  176. 176.↵
    1. Foster CA,
    2. Yokozeki H,
    3. Rappersberger K,
    4. Koning F,
    5. Volc-Platzer B,
    6. Rieger A,
    7. Coligan JE,
    8. Wolff K,
    9. Stingl G
    . 1990. Human epidermal T cells predominantly belong to the lineage expressing alpha/beta T cell receptor. J Exp Med 171:997–1013. doi:10.1084/jem.171.4.997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  177. 177.↵
    1. Bos JD,
    2. Zonneveld I,
    3. Das PK,
    4. Krieg SR,
    5. van der Loos CM,
    6. Kapsenberg ML
    . 1987. The skin immune system (SIS): distribution and immunophenotype of lymphocyte subpopulations in normal human skin. J Invest Dermatol 88:569–573. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  178. 178.↵
    1. de Sousa JR,
    2. Quaresma JAS
    . 2018. The role of T helper 25 cells in the immune response to M. leprae. J Am Acad Dermatol 78:1009–1011. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.025.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  179. 179.↵
    1. Sousa JR,
    2. Pagliari C,
    3. de Almeida DSM,
    4. Barros LFL,
    5. Carneiro FRO,
    6. Dias LB, Jr,
    7. de Souza Aarão TL,
    8. Quaresma J
    . 2017. Th9 cytokines response and its possible implications in the immunopathogenesis of leprosy. J Clin Pathol 70:521–527. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2016-204110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  180. 180.↵
    1. Silveira EL,
    2. Sousa JR,
    3. Aarão TLS,
    4. Fuzii HT,
    5. Dias Junior LB,
    6. Carneiro FR,
    7. Quaresma JA
    . 2015. New immunologic pathways in the pathogenesis of leprosy: role for Th22 cytokines in the polar forms of the disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 72:729–730. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.023.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  181. 181.↵
    1. Kutlu A,
    2. Bozkurt B,
    3. Ciftci F,
    4. Bozkanat E
    . 2007. Th1-Th2 interaction: is more complex than a see-saw? Scand J Immunol 65:393–395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.01917.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  182. 182.↵
    1. Lowes MA,
    2. Suárez-Fariñas M,
    3. Krueger JG
    . 2014. Immunology of psoriasis. Annu Rev Immunol 32:227–255. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  183. 183.↵
    1. Di Cesare A,
    2. Di Meglio P,
    3. Nestle FO
    . 2009. The IL-23/Th17 axis in the immunopathogenesis of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 129:1339–1350. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  184. 184.↵
    1. Chien CH,
    2. Chiang BL
    . 2017. Regulatory T cells induced by B cells: a novel subpopulation of regulatory T cells. J Biomed Sci 24:86. doi:10.1186/s12929-017-0391-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  185. 185.↵
    1. Singh B,
    2. Krawetz MD,
    3. De Lima RM,
    4. Mukherjee R,
    5. Chaturvedi P,
    6. Lee-Chan E,
    7. Leiter EH,
    8. Summers KL
    . 2018. Role of TGF-β in self-peptide regulation of autoimmunity. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 66:11–19. doi:10.1007/s00005-017-0482-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  186. 186.↵
    1. Torres-Poveda K,
    2. Burguete-García AI,
    3. Bahena-Román M,
    4. Méndez-Martínez R,
    5. Zurita-Díaz MA,
    6. López-Estrada G,
    7. Delgado-Romero K,
    8. Peralta-Zaragoza O,
    9. Bermúdez-Morales VH,
    10. Cantú D,
    11. García-Carrancá A,
    12. Madrid-Marina V
    . 2016. Risk allelic load in Th2 and Th3 cytokines genes as biomarker of susceptibility to HPV-16 positive cervical cancer: a case control study. BMC Cancer 16:330. doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2364-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  187. 187.↵
    1. Mihailova S,
    2. Ivanova-Genova E,
    3. Lukanov T,
    4. Stoyanova V,
    5. Milanova V,
    6. Naumova E
    . 2016. A study of TNF-α, TGF-β, IL-10, IL-6, and IFN-γ gene polymorphisms in patients with depression. J Neuroimmunol 293:123–128. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.03.005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  188. 188.↵
    1. Mucida D,
    2. Park Y,
    3. Kim G,
    4. Turovskaya O,
    5. Scott I,
    6. Kronenberg M,
    7. Cheroutre H
    . 2007. Reciprocal TH17 and regulatory T cell differentiation mediated by retinoic acid. Science 317:256–260. doi:10.1126/science.1145697.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  189. 189.↵
    1. Mohr A,
    2. Malhotra R,
    3. Mayer G,
    4. Gorochov G,
    5. Miyara M
    . 2018. Human FOXP3(+) T regulatory cell heterogeneity. Clin Transl Immunology 7:e1005. doi:10.1002/cti2.1005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  190. 190.↵
    1. Farahani P,
    2. Halabian R,
    3. Vahedi E,
    4. Salimian J
    . 2017. Increased genes expression levels of cytokines related to Th17/Treg cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cell correlate with clinical severity in COPD and mustard gas-exposed patients. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 16:396–403.
    OpenUrl
  191. 191.↵
    1. Komai T,
    2. Okamura T,
    3. Yamamoto K,
    4. Fujio K
    . 2016. The effects of TGF-βs on imune responses. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi 39:51–58. (In Japanese.) doi:10.2177/jsci.39.51.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  192. 192.↵
    1. Weiner HL,
    2. da Cunha AP,
    3. Quintana F,
    4. Wu H
    . 2011. Oral tolerance. Immunol Rev 241:241–259. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01017.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  193. 193.↵
    1. Kitani A,
    2. Chua K,
    3. Nakamura K,
    4. Strober W
    . 2000. Activated self-MHC-reactive T cells have the cytokine phenotype of Th3/T regulatory cell 1 T cells. J Immunol 165:691–702. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  194. 194.↵
    1. Lewkowicz N,
    2. Kur B,
    3. Kurnatowska A,
    4. Tchorzewski H,
    5. Lewkowicz P
    . 2011. Expression of Th1/Th2/Th3/Th17-related genes in recurrent aphthous ulcers. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 59:399–406. doi:10.1007/s00005-011-0134-1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  195. 195.↵
    1. Carrier Y,
    2. Yuan J,
    3. Kuchroo VK,
    4. Weiner HL
    . 2007. Th3 cells in peripheral tolerance. I. Induction of Foxp3-positive regulatory T cells by Th3 cells derived from TGF-beta T cell-transgenic mice. J Immunol 178:179–185. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.1.179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  196. 196.↵
    1. Sanchez Rodriguez R,
    2. Pauli ML,
    3. Neuhaus IM,
    4. Yu SS,
    5. Arron ST,
    6. Harris HW,
    7. Yang SH,
    8. Anthony BA,
    9. Sverdrup FM,
    10. Krow-Lucal E,
    11. MacKenzie TC,
    12. Johnson DS,
    13. Meyer EH,
    14. Löhr A,
    15. Hsu A,
    16. Koo J,
    17. Liao W,
    18. Gupta R,
    19. Debbaneh MG,
    20. Butler D,
    21. Huynh M,
    22. Levin EC,
    23. Leon A,
    24. Hoffman WY,
    25. McGrath MH,
    26. Alvarado MD,
    27. Ludwig CH,
    28. Truong HA,
    29. Maurano MM,
    30. Gratz IK,
    31. Abbas AK,
    32. Rosenblum MD
    . 2014. Memory regulatory T cells reside in human skin. J Clin Invest 124:1027–1036. doi:10.1172/JCI72932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  197. 197.↵
    1. Sharma A,
    2. Rudra D
    . 2018. Emerging functions of regulatory T cells in tissue homeostasis. Front Immunol 9:883. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00883.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  198. 198.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Tan J,
    3. Martino MM,
    4. Lui KO
    . 2018. Regulatory T-cells: potential regulator of tissue repair and regeneration. Front Immunol 9:585. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00585.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  199. 199.↵
    1. Owczarczyk-Saczonek A,
    2. Czerwińska J,
    3. Placek W
    . 2018. The role of regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines in psoriasis. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 27:17–23.
    OpenUrl
  200. 200.↵
    1. Malhotra N,
    2. Leyva-Castillo JM,
    3. Jadhav U,
    4. Barreiro O,
    5. Kam C,
    6. O'Neill NK,
    7. Meylan F,
    8. Chambon P,
    9. von Andrian UH,
    10. Siegel RM,
    11. Wang EC,
    12. Shivdasani R,
    13. Geha RS
    . 2018. RORα-expressing T regulatory cells restrain allergic skin inflammation. Sci Immunol 3:21.
    OpenUrl
  201. 201.↵
    1. Scharschmidt TC,
    2. Vasquez KS,
    3. Pauli ML,
    4. Leitner EG,
    5. Chu K,
    6. Truong H-A,
    7. Lowe MM,
    8. Sanchez Rodriguez R,
    9. Ali N,
    10. Laszik ZG,
    11. Sonnenburg JL,
    12. Millar SE,
    13. Rosenblum MD
    . 2017. Commensal microbes and hair follicle morphogenesis coordinately drive Treg migration into neonatal skin. Cell Host Microbe 21:467–477. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  202. 202.↵
    1. Gratz IK,
    2. Truong HA,
    3. Yang SH,
    4. Maurano MM,
    5. Lee K,
    6. Abbas AK,
    7. Rosenblum MD
    . 2013. Cutting edge: memory regulatory T cells require IL-7 and not IL-2 for their maintenance in peripheral tissues. J Immunol 190:4483–4487. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  203. 203.↵
    1. Chow Z,
    2. Mueller SN,
    3. Deane JA,
    4. Hickey MJ
    . 2013. Dermal regulatory T cells display distinct migratory behavior that is modulated during adaptive and innate inflammation. J Immunol 191:3049–3056. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1203205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  204. 204.↵
    1. Akagawa KS
    . 2012. Recent advances in tuberculosis immunity. Kekkaku 87:61–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  205. 205.↵
    1. McDonald DR
    . 2012. TH17 deficiency in human disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 129:1429–1435. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.03.034.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  206. 206.↵
    1. Nograles KE,
    2. Zaba LC,
    3. Shemer A,
    4. Fuentes-Duculan J,
    5. Cardinale I,
    6. Kikuchi T,
    7. Ramon M,
    8. Bergman R,
    9. Krueger JG,
    10. Guttman-Yassky E
    . 2009. IL-22-producing “T22” T cells account for upregulated IL-22 in atopic dermatitis despite reduced IL-17-producing TH17 T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 123:1244–1252. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.041.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  207. 207.↵
    1. Zhong W,
    2. Jiang Y,
    3. Ma H,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Jiang Z,
    6. Zhao L
    . 2017. Elevated levels of CCR6+ T helper 22 cells correlate with skin and renal impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci Rep 7:12962. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13344-w.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  208. 208.↵
    1. Ting L,
    2. Yan L,
    3. Shuang Y,
    4. Congcong Y,
    5. Peng L,
    6. Jingjing Y,
    7. Daoxin M,
    8. Chunyan J
    . 2016. Increased frequency of circulating Th22 cells in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncotarget 7:56574–56583. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.10966.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  209. 209.↵
    1. Eyerich K,
    2. Eyerich S
    . 2015. Th22 cells in allergic disease. Allergo J Int 24:1–7. doi:10.1007/s40629-015-0039-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  210. 210.↵
    1. Cheuk S,
    2. Wikén M,
    3. Blomqvist L,
    4. Nylén S,
    5. Talme T,
    6. Ståhle M,
    7. Eidsmo L
    . 2014. Epidermal Th22 and Tc17 cells form a localized disease memory in clinically healed psoriasis. J Immunol 192:3111–3120. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1302313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  211. 211.↵
    1. Michalak-Stoma A,
    2. Bartosińska J,
    3. Kowal M,
    4. Juszkiewicz-Borowiec M,
    5. Gerkowicz A,
    6. Chodorowska G
    . 2013. Serum levels of selected Th17 and Th22 cytokines in psoriatic patients. Dis Markers 35:625–631. doi:10.1155/2013/856056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  212. 212.↵
    1. Eyerich S,
    2. Eyerich K,
    3. Pennino D,
    4. Carbone T,
    5. Nasorri F,
    6. Pallotta S,
    7. Cianfarani F,
    8. Odorisio T,
    9. Traidl-Hoffmann C,
    10. Behrendt H,
    11. Durham SR,
    12. Schmidt-Weber CB,
    13. Cavani A
    . 2009. Th22 cells represent a distinct human T cell subset involved in epidermal immunity and remodeling. J Clin Invest 119:3573–3585.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  213. 213.↵
    1. Kaplan MH,
    2. Hufford MM,
    3. Olson MR
    . 2015. The development and in vivo function of T helper 9 cells. Nat Rev Immunol 15:295–307. doi:10.1038/nri3824.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  214. 214.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Chen S,
    3. Xiao X,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Ding W,
    6. Li XC
    . 2017. IL-9 and Th9 cells in health and diseases—from tolerance to immunopathology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 37:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2017.07.004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  215. 215.↵
    1. Rochfort KD,
    2. Cummins PM
    . 2015. The blood-brain barrier endothelium: a target for pro-inflammatory cytokines. Biochem Soc Trans 43:702–706. doi:10.1042/BST20140319.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  216. 216.↵
    1. Schlapbach C,
    2. Gehad A,
    3. Yang C,
    4. Watanabe R,
    5. Guenova E,
    6. Teague JE,
    7. Campbell L,
    8. Yawalkar N,
    9. Kupper TS,
    10. Clark RA
    . 2014. Human TH9 cells are skin-tropic and have autocrine and paracrine proinflammatory capacity. Sci Transl Med 6:219.
    OpenUrl
  217. 217.↵
    1. Singh TP,
    2. Schön MP,
    3. Wallbrecht K,
    4. Gruber-Wackernagel A,
    5. Wang XJ,
    6. Wolf P
    . 2013. Involvement of IL-9 in Th17-associated inflammation and angiogenesis of psoriasis. PLoS One 8:e51752. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  218. 218.↵
    1. Farahani R,
    2. Sherkat R,
    3. Hakemi MG,
    4. Eskandari N,
    5. Yazdani R
    . 2014. Cytokines (interleukin-9, IL-17, IL-22, IL-25 and IL-33) and asthma. Adv Biomed Res 3:127. doi:10.4103/2277-9175.133249.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  219. 219.↵
    1. Caza T,
    2. Landas S
    . 2015. Functional and phenotypic plasticity of CD4(+) T cell subsets. Biomed Res Int 2015:521957. doi:10.1155/2015/521957.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  220. 220.↵
    1. Monin L,
    2. Gaffen SL
    . 2017. Interleukin 17 family cytokines: signaling mechanisms, biological activities, and therapeutic implications. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 15:a028522. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a028522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  221. 221.↵
    1. Castro-Lopez N,
    2. Hung CY
    . 2017. Immune response to coccidioidomycosis and the development of a vaccine. Microorganisms 16:E13.
  222. 222.↵
    1. Liu L,
    2. Okada S,
    3. Kong XF,
    4. Kreins AY,
    5. Cypowyj S,
    6. Abhyankar A,
    7. Toubiana J,
    8. Itan Y,
    9. Audry M,
    10. Nitschke P,
    11. Masson C,
    12. Toth B,
    13. Flatot J,
    14. Migaud M,
    15. Chrabieh M,
    16. Kochetkov T,
    17. Bolze A,
    18. Borghesi A,
    19. Toulon A,
    20. Hiller J,
    21. Eyerich S,
    22. Eyerich K,
    23. Gulácsy V,
    24. Chernyshova L,
    25. Chernyshov V,
    26. Bondarenko A,
    27. Grimaldo RM,
    28. Blancas-Galicia L,
    29. Beas IM,
    30. Roesler J,
    31. Magdorf K,
    32. Engelhard D,
    33. Thumerelle C,
    34. Burgel PR,
    35. Hoernes M,
    36. Drexel B,
    37. Seger R,
    38. Kusuma T,
    39. Jansson AF,
    40. Sawalle-Belohradsky J,
    41. Belohradsky B,
    42. Jouanguy E,
    43. Bustamante J,
    44. Bué M,
    45. Karin N,
    46. Wildbaum G,
    47. Bodemer C,
    48. Lortholary O,
    49. Fischer A,
    50. Blanche S, et al
    . 2011. Gain-of-function human STAT1 mutations impair IL-17 immunity and underlie chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. J Exp Med 208:1635–1648. doi:10.1084/jem.20110958.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  223. 223.↵
    1. Nielsen MM,
    2. Witherden DA,
    3. Havran WL
    . 2017. γδ T cells in homeostasis and host defence of epithelial barrier tissues. Nat Rev Immunol 17:733–745. doi:10.1038/nri.2017.101.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  224. 224.↵
    1. Born WK,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Reinhardt RL,
    4. Huang H,
    5. Sun D,
    6. O’Brien RL
    . 2017. γδ T cells and B cells. Adv Immunol 134:1–45. doi:10.1016/bs.ai.2017.01.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  225. 225.↵
    1. O’Brien RL,
    2. Born WK
    . 2015. Dermal γδ T cells—what have we learned? Cell Immunol 296:62–69. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.01.011.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  226. 226.↵
    1. Macleod AS,
    2. Havran WL
    . 2011. Functions of skin-resident γδ T cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:2399–2408. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0702-x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  227. 227.↵
    1. Komori HK,
    2. Meehan TF,
    3. Havran WL
    . 2006. Epithelial and mucosal gamma delta T cells. Curr Opin Immunol 18:534–538. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2006.06.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  228. 228.↵
    1. Dambuza IM,
    2. He C,
    3. Choi JK,
    4. Yu CR,
    5. Wang R,
    6. Mattapallil MJ,
    7. Wingfield PT,
    8. Caspi RR,
    9. Egwuagu CE
    . 2017. IL-12p35 induces expansion of IL-10 and IL-35-expressing regulatory B cells and ameliorates autoimmune disease. Nat Commun 8:719. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00838-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  229. 229.↵
    1. Campbell JJ,
    2. Ebsworth K,
    3. Ertl LS,
    4. McMahon JP,
    5. Newland D,
    6. Wang Y,
    7. Liu S,
    8. Miao Z,
    9. Dang T,
    10. Zhang P,
    11. Charo IF,
    12. Singh R,
    13. Schall TJ
    . 2017. IL-17-secreting γδ T cells are completely dependent upon CCR6 for homing to inflamed skin. J Immunol 199:3129–3136. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700826.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  230. 230.↵
    1. Floudas A,
    2. Saunders SP,
    3. Moran T,
    4. Schwartz C,
    5. Hams E,
    6. Fitzgerald DC,
    7. Johnston JA,
    8. Ogg GS,
    9. McKenzie AN,
    10. Walsh PT,
    11. Fallon PG
    . 2017. IL-17 receptor A maintains and protects the skin barrier to prevent allergic skin inflammation. J Immunol 199:707–717. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1602185.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  231. 231.↵
    1. Fay NS,
    2. Larson EC,
    3. Jameson JM
    . 2016. Chronic inflammation and γδ T cells. Front Immunol 7:210. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  232. 232.↵
    1. Foppoli M,
    2. Ferreri AJ
    . 2015. Gamma-delta T-cell lymphomas. Eur J Haematol 94:206–218. doi:10.1111/ejh.12439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  233. 233.↵
    1. Siegers GM
    . 2018. Integral roles for integrins in γδ T cell function. Front Immunol 9:521. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00521.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  234. 234.↵
    1. Critchley-Thorne RJ,
    2. Yan N,
    3. Nacu S,
    4. Weber J,
    5. Holmes SP,
    6. Lee PP
    . 2007. Down-regulation of the interferon signaling pathway in T lymphocytes from patients with metastatic melanoma. PLoS Med 4:e176. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  235. 235.↵
    1. Imada K,
    2. Leonard WJ
    . 2000. The JAK-STAT pathway. Mol Immunol 37:1–11. doi:10.1016/S0161-5890(00)00018-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  236. 236.↵
    1. Imhof BA,
    2. Jemelin S,
    3. Emre Y
    . 2017. Toll-like receptors elicit different recruitment kinetics of monocytes and neutrophils in mouse acute inflammation. Eur J Immunol 47:1002–1008. doi:10.1002/eji.201746983.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  237. 237.↵
    1. Martin-Rodriguez S,
    2. Caballo C,
    3. Gutierrez G,
    4. Vera M,
    5. Cruzado JM,
    6. Cases A,
    7. Escolar G,
    8. Diaz-Ricart M
    . 2015. TLR4 and NALP3 inflammasome in the development of endothelial dysfunction in uraemia. Eur J Clin Invest 45:160–169. doi:10.1111/eci.12392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  238. 238.↵
    1. Majewska M,
    2. Szczepanik M
    . 2006. The role of Toll-like receptors (TLR) in innate and adaptive immune responses and their function in immune response regulation. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online) 60:52–63. (In Polish.)
    OpenUrlPubMed
  239. 239.↵
    1. Oude Nijhuis CS,
    2. Vellenga E,
    3. Daenen SM,
    4. Kamps WA,
    5. De Bont ES
    . 2003. Endothelial cells are main producers of interleukin 8 through Toll-like receptor 2 and 4 signaling during bacterial infection in leukopenic cancer patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 10:558–563. doi:10.1128/cdli.10.4.558-563.2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  240. 240.↵
    1. Hirata T,
    2. Merrill-Skoloff G,
    3. Aab M,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Furie BC,
    6. Furie B
    . 2000. P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) is a physiological ligand for E-selectin in mediating T helper 1 lymphocyte migration. J Exp Med 192:1669–1676. doi:10.1084/jem.192.11.1669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  241. 241.↵
    1. Stocker CJ,
    2. Sugars KL,
    3. Harari OA,
    4. Landis RC,
    5. Morley BJ,
    6. Haskard DO
    . 2000. TNF-a, IL-4, and IFN-g regulate differential expression of pand E-selectin expression by porcine aortic endothelial cells. J Immunol 164:3309–3315. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.6.3309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  242. 242.↵
    1. Kulidjian AA,
    2. Issekutz AC,
    3. Issekutz TB
    . 2002. Differential role of E-selectin and P-selectin in T lymphocyte migration to cutaneous inflammatory reactons induced by cytokines. Int Immunol 14:751–760. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxf045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  243. 243.↵
    1. Schimmel L,
    2. Heemskerk N,
    3. van Buul JD
    . 2017. Leukocyte transendothelial migration: a local affair. Small GTPases 8:1–15. doi:10.1080/21541248.2016.1197872.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  244. 244.↵
    1. Silva M,
    2. Videira PA,
    3. Sackstein R
    . 2017. E-Selectin ligands in the human mononuclear phagocyte system: implications for infection, inflammation, and immunotherapy. Front Immunol 8:1878. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01878.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  245. 245.↵
    1. Yang X,
    2. Chang Y,
    3. Wei W
    . 2016. Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation: immunity in rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm 2016:6813016. doi:10.1155/2016/6813016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  246. 246.↵
    1. Marcos-Ramiro B,
    2. García-Weber D,
    3. Millán J
    . 2014. TNF-induced endothelial barrier disruption: beyond actin and Rho. Thromb Haemost 112:1088–1102.